I'm just now listening to today's testimony in full. I'm listening to DS asking the grief "expert" about "assuming" a situation...
I have followed this case since the beginning, I've read almost every document involved, I went to Orlando and searched and read many message boards. And I couldn't keep up with all of the assumptions mentioned! How in the H#@% is a woman who is not familiar with this case, supposed to keep up with all that DS has just thrown out without a flow chart???? And even worse, why does this "expert" try and answer the question? I am speechless...
And why is ICA crying??? Who gave the signal? I missed that!![/QUOTE
Just wait until you hear JA give her a "hypothetical" situation. JA makes their experts look like his experts.