2011.07.26-28 HLN & FOX (Weekly) News Coverage - Caylee Anthony

[mck16]

Yep, but she is going to. She hates the bloggers and she loves the fact that she is out and is going to make a lot of money off this. I remember during one of the hearings that Cheney mentioned the bloggers and KC rolled her eyes in disgust.

So she is very happy especially if she checks out how angry all the posters on this Board are about her winning the case. She is lovin every minute of it. IMO

And that is why she needs therapy quickly. jmo

 

[back2back19]

It's a good indicator of just how much she is worth.

Heard they already do have a deal and it is worth millions.

There is also already a bidding war over the video of her getting off the plane with Mancuso. Laughing with a beer in her hand.

She is going to laugh all the way to the proverbial bank and then some.

That's sick but I always figured she'd make a whole lot cash off what happened to Caylee, so I am not at all surprised. I just hope the amount of people who watch the interview, buy the book, etc is nowhere near what the media expects.

 

[cluciano63]

NG has a new story posted about Casey, supposedly drinking a corona coming off of a plane...and already has nearly 3000 comments on it...her story on Madeline McCann has half as many...FWIW

 

[Solace]

NG has a new story posted about Casey, supposedly drinking a corona coming off of a plane...and already has nearly 3000 comments on it...her story on Madeline McCann has half as many...FWIW

Yes, she is with Mancuso (sp?) and she is reportedly laughing and says "I concur".

Baez already knew this would be major money and that is why he had her video'd. They are going to just rake it in.

 

[EPfan]

sbm

There are many reasons why GA may not have been a "great witness" but none of them=a logical reason to believe he was involved after Caylee's death or worse that he's the one that actually killed her..That's :crazy: imho

The same goes for "acting strange" or possibly "lying" on the stand..Cindy, btw, is guilty of both..She also didn't call 911 after smelling the car..And more then that she cleaned everything in it & doused it to kill the smell..Funny that the jury never suspected her of anything! It has to be cos Baez didn't point the finger at her like he did George..It seems the jury only absorbed what came out of Baez's pie-hole vs having a mind of their own.

K! Cindy said the tape belonged to George but that only means he bought it & was the main one in the family to use it..That doesn't mean that Casey or Cindy never did or didn't know where it was kept..IIRC, he said the "garage" & we know that FCA pulled her car in there & it was also where the laundry bag was kept that Caylee's dead body was stuffed in but the jury failed to see the connection. :waitasec:

JA came to a logical conclusion when he saw the duct tape stuck to dead Caylee's skull..Something the jury was incapable of doing.

The duck tape wasn't stuck to the the skull!!!! Where did you get that.
The tape was stuck to a mass of hair, laying beside the skull on the ground.

Casey was guilty for almost 3 years according to most people, before the trail started and before the evidence was known.
Was she involved? I believe definately, but I don't know how. Like right here on Websleuths there are so many theories that it can make you head spin thinking about them all. That is why I strictly blocked everything else and concentrated on the evidence only prescented at the trial. All the evidence was addressed by the defence, I don't think anybody can deny that. (right or wrong in ther minds here) Most every witness of the procecution was addressed and most of the time doubt was left.
I think GA could be somehow involved nobody can prove it just like there isn't enough proof otherwise.
Acting strange is a big deal for me (Casey acted strange too), and I can't get over GA not calling 911 at the tow yard. I can't imagine not calling if it had been one of my children that had been driving the car and I hadn't seen that child, my grandkids in awhile, and I have to go pick up a car at the tow yard and it smell like a dead body!!!! Just not even exceptable in my book. I would have been scared to death and called 911 immediatly. That makes him suspecious.
JA seeing that skull came to a theory, but it wasn't prove, and it wasn't stuck to the skull!!!!!
I think the jury used what they had; and did what they had to do. If the charge had been involuntary manslaughter then I think there might have been a guilty verdict for that. That is what I think this case should have been charged.

 

[MaryAnn]

Yes, she is with Mancuso (sp?) and she is reportedly laughing and says "I concur".

Baez already knew this would be major money and that is why he had her video'd. They are going to just rake it in.

so that really was ICA coming off the plane with the towel over her head?

 

[Solace]

so that really was ICA coming off the plane with the towel over her head?

NO, NO, supposedly there is a bidding war for a video of KC getting off the plane in Florida with a beer in her hand with Mancuso (sp) and laughing. Different one. But now the deals are coming out. I mean its been a respectable time - three weeks since verdict. Lets go KC. So KC is going and she is out to make her money. She absolutely hates the bloggers and the Orlando people who hate her and she is going to flaunt these deals in their faces.

 

[ZsaZsa]

I'm sure she is with Macaluso - they have the same sick sense of humor so they would be ideally suited. He paid $70K of his own money ( or some of his clients money, IIRC) to help her pay for her defense... if he's that stupid he deserves her.

 

[ZsaZsa]

I wonder how far this complaint will go?
http://www.noethics.net/News/index....es-mason-&catid=35:attorney-misfits&Itemid=54

 

[cluciano63]

I wonder how far this complaint will go?
http://www.noethics.net/News/index....es-mason-&catid=35:attorney-misfits&Itemid=54

I don't think it will go far...they can't be responsible for what Cindy said on the stand unless she comes out and says they told her to say it, I imagine...

 

[Bobbisangel]

How do you know? Were you there? Are you really one of the jurors?

Look at the verdict...that says it all!

 

[Solace]

I'm sure she is with Macaluso - they have the same sick sense of humor so they would be ideally suited. He paid $70K of his own money ( or some of his clients money, IIRC) to help her pay for her defense... if he's that stupid he deserves her.

Macaluso - that is who I mean - thank you.

 

[MaryAnn]

The duck tape wasn't stuck to the the skull!!!! Where did you get that.
The tape was stuck to a mass of hair, laying beside the skull on the ground.

Casey was guilty for almost 3 years according to most people, before the trail started and before the evidence was known.
Was she involved? I believe definately, but I don't know how. Like right here on Websleuths there are so many theories that it can make you head spin thinking about them all. That is why I strictly blocked everything else and concentrated on the evidence only prescented at the trial. All the evidence was addressed by the defence, I don't think anybody can deny that. (right or wrong in ther minds here) Most every witness of the procecution was addressed and most of the time doubt was left.
I think GA could be somehow involved nobody can prove it just like there isn't enough proof otherwise.
Acting strange is a big deal for me (Casey acted strange too), and I can't get over GA not calling 911 at the tow yard. I can't imagine not calling if it had been one of my children that had been driving the car and I hadn't seen that child, my grandkids in awhile, and I have to go pick up a car at the tow yard and it smell like a dead body!!!! Just not even exceptable in my book. I would have been scared to death and called 911 immediatly. That makes him suspecious.
JA seeing that skull came to a theory, but it wasn't prove, and it wasn't stuck to the skull!!!!!
I think the jury used what they had; and did what they had to do. If the charge had been involuntary manslaughter then I think there might have been a guilty verdict for that. That is what I think this case should have been charged.

Wow, how did you see the evidence photos to know that the tape was stuck to a mass of hair, laying beside the skull on the ground? All the pics I saw had Caylee's skull blocked out. Just curious how you know this as a fact?

 

[Wise Old Owl]

The duck tape wasn't stuck to the the skull!!!! Where did you get that.
The tape was stuck to a mass of hair, laying beside the skull on the ground.

Casey was guilty for almost 3 years according to most people, before the trail started and before the evidence was known.
Was she involved? I believe definately, but I don't know how. Like right here on Websleuths there are so many theories that it can make you head spin thinking about them all. That is why I strictly blocked everything else and concentrated on the evidence only prescented at the trial. All the evidence was addressed by the defence, I don't think anybody can deny that. (right or wrong in ther minds here) Most every witness of the procecution was addressed and most of the time doubt was left.
I think GA could be somehow involved nobody can prove it just like there isn't enough proof otherwise.
Acting strange is a big deal for me (Casey acted strange too), and I can't get over GA not calling 911 at the tow yard. I can't imagine not calling if it had been one of my children that had been driving the car and I hadn't seen that child, my grandkids in awhile, and I have to go pick up a car at the tow yard and it smell like a dead body!!!! Just not even exceptable in my book. I would have been scared to death and called 911 immediatly. That makes him suspecious.
JA seeing that skull came to a theory, but it wasn't prove, and it wasn't stuck to the skull!!!!!
I think the jury used what they had; and did what they had to do. If the charge had been involuntary manslaughter then I think there might have been a guilty verdict for that. That is what I think this case should have been charged.

BBM

The third charge was aggravated manslaughter of a child. It did INCLUDE a lesser offense of manslaughter. So, why wasn't that considered by the jury. It has been reported that the very first vote on the manslaughter charge was 6-6, yet by the very next morning those 6 guilty votes had been flipped.

The jury had a smorgasbord of lesser included charges to choose from - yet they didn't even discussed (or deliberate) any of them.

 

[Prof]

The duck tape wasn't stuck to the the skull!!!! .

Personally, I remember the forensic anthropologist's expert testimony at the trial that the duct tape was present on the face during decomposition. The duct tape must have been attached to some part of the decay for some time as the mandible was still in position.

Experts also testified that not many craniums at this stage of decomp are found with mandible at all, much less a whole skull with mandible in place.

Considering other bones were scattered by animals, that animals chewed on the bones, it is odd that the mandible was there with the cranium as if it were somehow attached, even though some of the skull's teeth were not.

Considering the speculation that Kronk stuck his meter reader tool in the eye socket and lifted the skull, or that he moved the skull at all, I would not expect that mandible to be in position. I have constantly wondered how the jurors got around this notion, since there was not a clear counterargument in my mind...what else would keep the mandible in place but the duct tape?

 

[kaki]

Personally, I remember the forensic anthropologist's expert testimony at the trial that the duct tape was present on the face during decomposition. The duct tape must have been attached to some part of the decay for some time as the mandible was still in position.

Experts also testified that not many craniums at this stage of decomp are found with mandible at all, much less a whole skull with mandible in place.

Considering other bones were scattered by animals, that animals chewed on the bones, it is odd that the mandible was there with the cranium as if it were somehow attached, even though some of the skull's teeth were not.

Considering the speculation that Kronk stuck his meter reader tool in the eye socket and lifted the skull, or that he moved the skull at all, I would not expect that mandible to be in position. I have constantly wondered how the jurors got around this notion, since there was not a clear counterargument in my mind...what else would keep the mandible in place but the duct tape?

They got around it by not thinking...or considering anything other than Baez's ridiculous OS...:banghead:

 

[DAWN TREADER]

BBM

The third charge was aggravated manslaughter of a child. It did INCLUDE a lesser offense of manslaughter. So, why wasn't that considered by the jury. It has been reported that the very first vote on the manslaughter charge was 6-6, yet by the very next morning those 6 guilty votes had been flipped.

The jury had a smorgasbord of lesser included charges to choose from - yet they didn't even discussed (or deliberate) any of them.

It appears the jurors didn't qualify their verdict with any measurable deliberation of the EVIDENCE presented during 6 weeks of trial because clearly George Anthony wasn't on trial. It was Casey Anthony. :banghead:

 

[DAWN TREADER]

Personally, I remember the forensic anthropologist's expert testimony at the trial that the duct tape was present on the face during decomposition. The duct tape must have been attached to some part of the decay for some time as the mandible was still in position.

Experts also testified that not many craniums at this stage of decomp are found with mandible at all, much less a whole skull with mandible in place.

Considering other bones were scattered by animals, that animals chewed on the bones, it is odd that the mandible was there with the cranium as if it were somehow attached, even though some of the skull's teeth were not.

Considering the speculation that Kronk stuck his meter reader tool in the eye socket and lifted the skull, or that he moved the skull at all, I would not expect that mandible to be in position. I have constantly wondered how the jurors got around this notion, since there was not a clear counterargument in my mind...what else would keep the mandible in place but the duct tape?

Spot on! :rocker:

 

[IfIMay]

I'm sure she is with Macaluso - they have the same sick sense of humor so they would be ideally suited. He paid $70K of his own money ( or some of his clients money, IIRC) to help her pay for her defense... if he's that stupid he deserves her.

Just please tell me he wasn't nekkid again. :sick:

 

[IfIMay]

Wow, how did you see the evidence photos to know that the tape was stuck to a mass of hair, laying beside the skull on the ground? All the pics I saw had Caylee's skull blocked out. Just curious how you know this as a fact?

Wow.. if I believed in conspiracy theories, I'd suspect one of the Pinellas 12 has joined us to try to get their story out. Still ain't buying. And if this is any indication of the listening skills of testimony. F-.