- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 5,129
- Reaction score
- 1,932
Yes RoseRed...I for one would LOVE to see some very special punishment for Miss Casey Anthony, murderess extrodinaire. AND....I'm not ashamed to admit it.
I'm right there with ya.

Yes RoseRed...I for one would LOVE to see some very special punishment for Miss Casey Anthony, murderess extrodinaire. AND....I'm not ashamed to admit it.
I can't post links here without putting the names of people or personal information into the thread that does not belong here as they are in no way part of the case.....but I found some with 20 or MORE counts that were put on NO JAIL TIME......just saying......
Why did Baez call AH "alleged victim"? Um Baez, Casey was CONVICTED of the six of those check charges. That makes AH an ACTUAL victim. Wow, I am still totally disgusted with Baez. Way to go to keep the sliminess intact, Baez. Sheesh.
This is what got me LL. We were here reading those logs for 3 years. How did we miss it?Even better:
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/28575199/detail.html
I'm not seeing any visits by a probation officer. Anyone else?
Casey was not on trial for one case of check fraud. Most people on their first outing don't have 11 counts against them. And they were felony counts. Not misdemeanors. Regardless she didn't want to go to trial and plead guilty.
She was not treated harshly because some of the multiple counts were not adjudicated.
Casey also was charged with using Amy's ID if I remember correctly.
Perry is saying you can not have it both ways. Some common sense at last here!!!
This deserves more than just a thank you. KC did not receive special treatment but the it seems the State and the <mod snip> want to sentence her for anything they can think up regardless. JMO
This is what got me LL. We were here reading those logs for 3 years. How did we miss it?
:waitasec: Does anyone know HOW Judge Perry will rule on today's hearing ? Will he issue an "Order" ... another "hearing" ?
Thanks ... I missed that part of the hearing this morning !
:waitasec:
This is what got me LL. We were here reading those logs for 3 years. How did we miss it?
I really believe the point to all of this is so that HHJP can have it as a matter of record in order to clarify his own sentence in her 4 convictions for Providing False Information to LE. He had 60 days to so and it seems that this may be the reason that the court invested in this "silly" hearing.
It annoys me that HHJP did not clarify, for the record, that HHJS was not "disqualified", on the fraud case, at the time of his ruling or his clarification.
While I believe this is probably ridiculous policy and not serving the intended purpose of probation status, it seems unfair that people believe that CA somehow was the ONLY person to ever to have served her probation that way. It wasn't something she asked for, or even knew that she SHOULD or COULD question. In other words, this particular fiasco is in no way any of her doing. There is also no harm in HER serving an additional probation time....the harm in that is not to HER at all. The harm comes in the precedent set for other people in the future having their status changed at the whim of a judge, who is the one ultimately responsible for signing an incorrect order in the first place.
:waitasec: Does anyone know HOW Judge Perry will rule on today's hearing ? Will he issue an "Order" ... another "hearing" ?
Thanks ... I missed that part of the hearing this morning !
:waitasec:
Maybe it was the PO that "phoned it in".
This person actually admitted that? Oh my...g-d bless her. I guess we were as much involved in Casey's probation as the DOC.Didn't the probation person say her person checked the OCJ database to see that FKC was still in jail and made her monthly "tick" beside her name in the DOC database - didn't even have to pick up the phone....