The idea that if Wayne is involved (I still have not seen the evidence) and he wanted to frame JR if things go sideways, that he stayed behind in his car on the parking lot (perhaps not realizing just how sophisticated their cams are now pointing out into the parking lot) and sent JR in for whatever, knowing that JR could be the fall-guy.
More than likely, if this all happens to be true, WW did not go into the house with JR, so there is no evidence of Wayne there, and JR could be holding the fire alone.
Whoever wrote that is definitely thinking and getting back away from the forest so he/she could see the trees.
When a crime such as murder is committed, aren't both people involved usually charged equally as if both had actually committed the crime? Especially when both suspects are from out of state and went to the degree of planning and execution (poor word selection, sorry) of the murder that they did? In other words, law enforcement would rightfully charge both Wright and Rodgers for the murder of Teresa Sievers. If Curtis Wright thought he was smart enough to bring Jimmy Rodgers in on the crime to take the rap for murder and escape murder charges for himself, I think he was mistaken. I
hope he was mistaken anyway.
Also... I find all this new information to be very interesting. Why? Because wasn't it Sheriff Scott that originally said "about two weeks after the murder they received information that led the investigation to Missouri?"
I'm trying to reconcile that statement with all this new information and it doesn't make sense to me. Sheriff Scott seemed at first to suggest that their investigation wasn't looking at anyone in Missouri for almost two weeks. Based on this latest bit of information, it now seems they were looking at Curtis Wright from early on (if not right away). Am I missing something here?
And I think ("think" being the operative word here) this new information also suggests that Mark Sievers was helping with the investigation, and likely knew nothing about Wright and Rodgers' plan to kill his wife. Fair enough. And if so, then how in the world did Wright know that Teresa was coming home a) by herself and b) a day earlier than the rest of the Sievers family?
Because I see three problems if Wright and Rodgers' plan was to kill Teresa when she returned home with the entire family, as scheduled, late Sunday afternoon/evening;
Problem 1 - If Teresa was the sole intended victim, would Wright and Rodgers risk killing her if her husband Mark was also home (unless they were prepared to kill him as well)?
Problem 2 - If Wright and Rodgers murdered Teresa on Sunday night instead of Saturday night, would that have given them enough time to drive the 1,200 miles back to Missouri by Monday night at five or six o'clock when Rodgers (for whatever reason) was said to have been expected back?
Sidebar: In fact, does anyone know when the pair did arrive back in Missouri from Florida or is that info also under wraps? Maybe they were able to drive 1,200 miles in 18 hours, but it seems very unlikely. Unless they both spent time behind the wheel and only stopped for food, fuel and bathroom breaks. Then maybe.
And of course Problem 3 - if Wright and Rodgers' plan was to kill Teresa Sunday afternoon/evening when she returned from vacation with the rest of her family, why were they both at the Sievers' residence by Saturday night? That's 24 hours of down-time out of a 72 hour window when time is of the essence. Doesn't make sense to me.
Well hopefully everything will make sense when all the evidence is made public. But until then, if anyone has an opinion on Sheriff's Scott's two seemingly conflicting statements regarding what they knew and when they knew it, I'm all ears. As always, "TIA" in advance.
