During Friday's proceedings, CourtTV put up a graphic that BK followed three of the victims on Instagram. I know that initially, there was not a Meta warrant for BK, but I no longer remember if that changed.
Where can I find links to all of the warrants? I thought they were on the ID Court site, but I did not see them.
TIA
Thanks. That's where I looked, but I did not see the SM warrants. They may be buried in some document that isn't obvious.
I'm looking because I don't recall seeing anything that confirmed that he followed them either, but before I state there wasn't a Meta warrant for BK, I want to make sure!
Thanks. That's where I looked, but I did not see the SM warrants. They may be buried in some document that isn't obvious.
I'm looking because I don't recall seeing anything that confirmed that he followed them either, but before I state there wasn't a Meta warrant for BK, I want to make sure!
Thanks. That's where I looked, but I did not see the SM warrants. They may be buried in some document that isn't obvious.
I'm looking because I don't recall seeing anything that confirmed that he followed them either, but before I state there wasn't a Meta warrant for BK, I want to make sure!
Same link we're looking at. Can't give a more specific link to Meta search warrant(s) for BK, because none are listed for him (as far as I can tell, so MOO)
Same link we're looking at. Can't give a more specific link to Meta search warrant(s) for BK, because none are listed for him (as far as I can tell, so MOO)
And they have been told how he was identified. They used a very commonly used method to identify his DNA by finding his relatives and tracking him from there. The Golden State Killer was famously caught in the same fashion.
Investigative genetic genealogy is a new and complex law enforcement technique that should not be regulated by accident or as an afterthought.
blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu
Known as investigative genetic genealogy (IGG), this technique was used in 2018 to identify the Golden State Killer, whose crime spree terrorized California residents for decades. IGG has since helped close over 800 cases around the country—and counting. Many of these cases had long gone cold and could not be solved in any other way.
In addition to solving violent crimes, IGG has helped to exonerate at least two individuals who were convicted of crimes they did not commit. It also has provided closure to those with missing loved ones whose remains could not, until now, be identified.
But IF there was anything done illegally in identifying BK, then light must be shed upon it, people must be fired and held legally accountable for their actions.
I have six from that date on my computer? Where did you find the deleted one? Sorry for asking, but I'm really curious and it's something that's seemed odd since the warrants were released (redacted of course). Thank you!
I have six from that date on my computer? Where did you find the deleted one? Sorry for asking, but I'm really curious and it's something that's seemed odd since the warrants were released (redacted of course). Thank you!
I have six from that date on my computer? Where did you find the deleted one? Sorry for asking, but I'm really curious and it's something that's seemed odd since the warrants were released (redacted of course). Thank you!
I dont understand your thought process: Why would the prosecution necessarily need more "to fix BK inside that house"? Likely he was never in the house until he decided to commit murder there. Even if his DNA was found somewhere in the house, it would not be a big deal- imagine how many people came through that home. The DNA on the sheath is what is the mot important element of the case, though the defense is trying mightily to get it minimized or even kicked from the case. Don't be fooled by the defense- If there is no BK DNA in the house it does not matter: what matters is where the DNA was found- on the sheath. The defense is scared to death of that element-- the defense also knows their client has no alibi for the night in question: playing all these games only makes it more obvious and makes their client look more guilty.
I think I put it in pretty basic terms but I'll elaborate when the defence said that nothing places BK in the house, it struck me as worrisome. As he could claim a thousand different ways that his DNA came to be on a sheath *if* there is no single other forensic that places him inside the house. I believe there will be a lot we don't know about and there's still the foot print too.
Thank you!!! My eyes are going crossed looking at what's on my computer and what's on the Cases of Interest page.
It seems like it was discussed (when the initial warrants were released) that it was strange -- esp given the rumors in assorted media that he was following at least one of the victims. I'm pretty sure that it was expected they would release more - including his Meta... but...
Have law enforcement ever got it really badly wrong, in any case, where the original defendant ends up not being the actual perp? Do you think it’s possible at all in the US system that this has happened?
Thank you!!! My eyes are going crossed looking at what's on my computer and what's on the Cases of Interest page.
It seems like it was discussed (when the initial warrants were released) that it was strange -- esp given the rumors in assorted media that he was following at least one of the victims. I'm pretty sure that it was expected they would release more - including his Meta... but...
It's obvious from these warrants he didn't have a facebook account nor an instagram one.
It is probably just one of the many unsubstantiated lies/rumors in this case.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.