5-9-12 Steven Powell Trial *GUILTY!!!* 6-15-12 SENTENCING HEARING

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
Defense asking jurors why fingerprints were not taken off the disk.
 
  • #162
Now for Blinn's rebuttal.
 
  • #163
  • #164
I don't know what is wrong with the SLT website, I've been trying to get the link to the juror instructions and it's gone batty. Just keeps clicking and clicking and never comes up.

Anyway......one of the instructions, that I will hopefully be able to go back and get the docs/links, states one of the stipulations of guilt is that he used the photos for his sexual gradification. Why? He still invaded their privacy...and it was still voyeurism, imo. The trauma he placed upon the girls and family are the same whether he used them for *(&&&^ or not!!!

Finally got link. The doc link is on the left: http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/54116647-78/powell-images-currie-blinn.html.csp
 
  • #165
I don't know what is wrong with the SLT website, I've been trying to get the link to the juror instructions and it's gone batty. Just keeps clicking and clicking and never comes up.

Anyway......one of the instructions, that I will hopefully be able to go back and get the docs/links, states one of the stipulations of guilt is that he used the photos for his sexual gradification. Why? He still invaded their privacy...and it was still voyeurism, imo. The trauma he placed upon the girls and family are the same whether he used them for *(&&&^ or not!!!
Hmmmm...... that is an odd stipulation, however, wouldn't the photos of him wackin' off to them substantiate the fact that he did?
 
  • #166
Hmmmm...... that is an odd stipulation, however, wouldn't the photos of him wackin' off to them substantiate the fact that he did?

Wouldn't it show intent on sp's part?

It's not that he was just looking out the window one day, saw the girls and grabbed his camera but that he CHOSE to take pictures of the girls so that he could get off on the pics later. [I'm gonna go take a shower in bleach now, after thinking, typing and seeing what I just wrote] :barf:
 
  • #167
Hmmmm...... that is an odd stipulation, however, wouldn't the photos of him wackin' off to them substantiate the fact that he did?

You said it...I didn't...:floorlaugh:, but yeh, you'd thunk.
 
  • #168
From Twitter:

Drew Mikkelsen ‏ @drewmikk

Judical assistant says #stevenpowell jury will be back tomorrow at 9am. NO VERDICT TODAY.
 
  • #169
  • #170
Where is Susan?
 
  • #171
Alina Powell said she released the video to clear up misconceptions about the relationship between Susan Powell and Alina Powell's father, Susan's father-in-law.


"What other people are saying is that Susan hated my dad so much that she wouldn't have tolerated even the mere presence of him, was deathly afraid of him, or whatever they've tried to claim about her," she said. "But these videos show, at minimum, she at least tolerated him, and was perfectly comfortable with her and her kids being around him. I wouldn't presume to put words in her mouth about whether she loved being around him, but she certainly wasn't adamantly opposed to their spending time with him like others have suggested."
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=20422176

It could also be construed as, she wanted to be there to monitor his interactions with her sons.
 
  • #172
  • #173
  • #174
  • #175
  • #176
Wow, when will the powells learn to stay away from the internet? :banghead:

I don't think the P's can help themselves Jacie. It's compulsive, IMO.

wm

OT
I'd like to thank you all for the updates on SP's trial. I have been busy w/ RL stuff and unable to keep up. You all :rocker:
 
  • #177
Jury has a question, everyone back in at 10:15
 
  • #178
Verdict in
 
  • #179
:gasp:



:please:
 
  • #180
does anyone have a live stream link that's working?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
2,467
Total visitors
2,568

Forum statistics

Threads
632,095
Messages
18,621,935
Members
243,019
Latest member
joslynd94
Back
Top