dreamweaver
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
- Messages
- 6,093
- Reaction score
- 288
--------------------------------
Nice summation of all the facts.
Nice to hear Benjaman speak also.
--------------------------------
=============================Article is out in these magazines:
Finally Magazine:
http://www.finallymagazine.com/life...e-living/social/1530-can-you-help-identify-me
Senior Citizens Magazine:
http://www.seniorcitizensmagazine.c...e-living/social/1508-can-you-help-identify-me
Modern Culture Magazine:
http://www.modernculturemagazine.co...e-living/social/1487-can-you-help-identify-me
Baby Boomer Magazine:
http://www.babyboomermagazine.com/l...e-living/social/1508-can-you-help-identify-me
Sorry it's been so long since I've logged in..
I got a google email alert, I see there is more interest in Ben.
I just put the blog online today, it is here
Believe, you still have my gmail address.
If something is wrong with the blog, email me it that addy.
My hubby was diagnosed with cancer a few weeks ago; my time is limited.
I decided to put the blog online without going back over it, so I apologize if something isn't right. I also made his album public - it's all the pictures I had saved of him.
http://tinyurl.com/ybba4m5
Good luck Ben!
==========================================
Before we start another media blitz I want to respectfully suggest that we have a more conservative approach to the recitation of his condition when found. I think it is fair to say that he was found unconscious, I think we have agreed that we will no longer use his lack of attire because it is in poor taste (IIRC) and that he has amnesia which has prevented his ability to recapture the life he had before being found at Burger King. Am I making sense? I do not want the non verified details cluttering up or misdirecting someone who may have relevant information. Even his Wikipedia page states currently (when last I checked anyway) that his field of vision may have been changing because of his cataracts PRIOR to his discovery.
Before we start another media blitz I want to respectfully suggest that we have a more conservative approach to the recitation of his condition when found. I think it is fair to say that he was found unconscious, I think we have agreed that we will no longer use his lack of attire because it is in poor taste (IIRC) and that he has amnesia which has prevented his ability to recapture the life he had before being found at Burger King. Am I making sense? I do not want the non verified details cluttering up or misdirecting someone who may have relevant information. Even his Wikipedia page states currently (when last I checked anyway) that his field of vision may have been changing because of his cataracts PRIOR to his discovery.
And again, IMO,
I think BK is over 55 years old.
Maybe that is because I am a little over that age myself.
The things he has mentioned, etc., seem more in the over 55 and probably just about 60 generation.
I have a question, and wasn't sure where to put it. Have fliers on Ben ever been distributed in Georgia & other possible locales at places where the homeless might gather, soup kitchens, bunkhouses, food distribution centers of churches?
The Center for Justice Administration at Armstrong University constructed a flyer in late August of 2009, which was distributed via LE channels beginning in September. All of my personal info was on it for contact, so forgive me if I do not post a copy of the flyer here, lol-I could not figure out how to redact it. The preference of NB was that the leads requiring further investigation be forwarded to her and her "team." You will see in this thread that it was relatively easy to vet the majority of them. I wanted you guys to get a sense of what was called in and from where....