Hey adnoid,
I feel like it dilutes what our society considers to be murder in an unacceptable way. I don't mind if it's considered, based on the circumstances, but I think it's ridiculous to make it the go-to charge. I think, for the most part, someone driving impaired does so for one of two reasons - (a) they think they are fine to drive or (b) they are in a blackout and have no conscious understanding of the choice they are making.
Now, there are, of course, incidents where - (c) they are suicidal and don't care if they take someone out as long as they take themselves out, in which case, a murder charge on the dead person doesn't matter in the criminal sense or (d) they are sociopathic and don't care who they put in danger - I don't mind if (d) cases are considered for murder charges, I just think they are the exception rather than the rule.
Certainly, in that 60 Minutes article, the young man charged with Murder didn't seem (based on what the article put forth) to fall into the (c) or (d) category.
I think someone driving drunk when they think they are okay is very different than someone planning and carrying out a plan to take someone's life. That's why we have a legal category of manslaughter.
I am also bothered by how widely different the sentences people pull for DWI causing death are. 3 years for someone in this state.....18 years for someone in this state.....probation for some. I would like to see us move to something more uniform.
I have had people close to me in all positions (driving impaired and harming someone, driving impaired and causing harm to someone, driving impaired and causing harm to themselves....and also, driving impaired and making it home just fine) and I think it's a terrible scourge and I don't mind tough sentences being applied. However, I'll never consider it murder. MOO, of course - others obviously do.