A New Approach to Moderation at Websleuths

  • #2
If a post is flagged in any way are we still allowed to discuss it?
 
  • #3
Does this mean that Fox News, and all affiliates are still banned at Websleuths as a source?
 
  • #4
This should solve most if not all the issues facing WS that may be preventing it from garnering new members who will remain here and keeping current members satisfied.

Waiting on reply to Eli9 to see if my comments hold water.
 
  • #5
Does this mean that Fox News, and all affiliates are still banned at Websleuths as a source?
FOX affiliates are not banned, just FOX.
 
  • #6
If a post is flagged in any way are we still allowed to discuss it?
If not threads could end up looking like one long- looooooong blur. 🤣
 
  • #7
  • #8
If not threads could end up looking like one long- looooooong blur. 🤣
LOL. Too much work for the mods. I want my own blurring tooltip.
 
  • #9
Seems kind of biased that only Fox would be banned.
Here ya go.

 
  • #10
  • #11
I have had comments from Fox affiliates deleted.
Me too.
If this new idea is implemented it could eliminate the issues of inconsistent moderation when it comes to what is and what isn't an approved source.
 
  • #12
A comprehensive site policy is being developed -- no ETA, but it is in the works.

While I wouldn't expect it to be too different from what we have now as far as what is allowed and what is not, it will have well-defined parameters.

For now, I appreciate your patience.
 
  • #13
A comprehensive site policy is being developed -- no ETA, but it is in the works.

While I wouldn't expect it to be too different from what we have now as far as what is allowed and what is not, it will have well-defined parameters.

For now, I appreciate your patience.
Fair enough and thanks for the heads up and the reply.

But do put consideration into the fact us Websleuthers are totally going to click on the blurred part on cases we follow cause we are nosey like that and it's beyond our self control. 🫣
 
  • #14
Fair enough and thanks for the heads up and the reply.

But do put consideration into the fact us Websleuthers are totally going to click on the blurred part on cases we follow cause we are nosey like that and it's beyond our self control. 🫣
I hope that you do. The whole point is that we trust you to make your own decisions. What I can do is give you as much information about what you're about to click beforehand.
 
  • #15
Just to throw my two cents in, fwiw.

The reason I became a member of this site is because it's a refuge from the absolute garbage commodity that true crime has become on social media sites. Victim blaming, conspiracy theories, rampant rumors from dubious news sources or individuals, and just flat out meanness is the norm, not the exception, in most Facebook and Reddit true crime discussions. I sincerely appreciate and value the Webslueths ethos. Webslueths is an oasis from the nonsense that much of the internet has become.

I fear that some of the changes being proposed could water down the ingredients that make Webslueths so special to me.


Reed
 
  • #16
Seems kind of biased that only Fox would be banned.
It isn't just Fox that is banned. There are others as well. I just don't have a list. But back to Fox... This isn't new and it's not local Fox stations. It's just Fox National and has been in effect since may 3th, 2023.

See Tricia's post about that change below:

 
  • #17
Does this mean that Fox News, and all affiliates are still banned at Websleuths as a source?
It's never been that way (all affiliates). Just Fox NATIONAL.
 
  • #18
  • #19
Just to throw my two cents in, fwiw.

The reason I became a member of this site is because it's a refuge from the absolute garbage commodity that true crime has become on social media sites. Victim blaming, conspiracy theories, rampant rumors from dubious news sources or individuals, and just flat out meanness is the norm, not the exception, in most Facebook and Reddit true crime discussions. I sincerely appreciate and value the Webslueths ethos. Webslueths is an oasis from the nonsense that much of the internet has become.

I fear that some of the changes being proposed could water down the ingredients that make Webslueths so special to me.


Reed
Sincerely appreciate your feedback. You'll be glad to know that we fear what you fear, and we only wish to allow some flexibility in what should be an open conversation but not at the expense of what you value in Websleuths.

If it turns out we've made things too flexible, we'll tighten it up. If we're too tight, we'll relax a bit. The point being our systems only allowed for approval or deletion -- there was no in-between. There was no opportunity to find nuance as circumstances warrant.

I want you to reach out to me if anything's not working for you. Nothing will change if we can't talk about it.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
Victim blaming, conspiracy theories, rampant rumors from dubious news sources or individuals... <snip>
One limitation of a flagged post is that you cannot reply or like a flagged post. If you try to copy and paste it into a reply, you're prevented from doing so. The hope is that we slow down the propagation of rumors and unverified information. We can never stop it, but we don't wish to encourage it either.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
3,119
Total visitors
3,193

Forum statistics

Threads
637,544
Messages
18,715,854
Members
244,150
Latest member
ytrdbjuytr
Back
Top