My 2 kids are 12 and 15, we are a pretty liberal household..."whatever floats your boat" is what we have taught them about most types of life decisions....BUT like I said when this thread started..the previews for the Barbabra Walters special were airing and my 12 year old son just happened to be watching (not too much of an introduction was given on what they were about to show) this scene pops up of what APPEARS to be a man in stirrups about to give birth...he has a freaking beard!!!...My son's eyes were huge! He says to me "Mom, how is the baby going to come out of HIM???" So ummm..I really tried to explain what was happening here...really I did! He gave me a few minutes before hightailing it outside. Again, I'm not saying they are bad people or whatever...but seriously. And about the death process, you did great...however that is a normal part of life.
I think you did a good job explaining it in that situation. Under the circumstances (seeing a dude with a beard in stirrups giving birth) I'd be a little shocked too, seeing as it's technically biologically impossible for a man to bear children. I suppose I'm an advocate of curiosity. If you don't know something or something seems confusing or impossible, look it up, ask questions, but don't belittle and insult the situation by just saying 'that's sick, it's so gross, I can't believe he's doing that.' It's not helpful to anyone. But like I said, bravo to you for explaining it the best you could to your son.
Exactly my point in all of this hoohah...she wanted to be happier, and inside she was happier a he...so she became a he for the MOST part..still choosing to have the option of giving birth one day..so is he who was a she really happy?
She becomes a he through surgical organ reassignment and hormone therapy. They didn't perform a hysterectomy because 1) hormones can be regulated through medications now, and 2) it would be a pointless procedure only putting the patient at more risk for infections. Have you ever gone to your physician and said 'I'd like you to remove my spleen because I don't want to ever need it or use it.' ? Of course not. So he never THOUGHT he'd have a baby. That was a sacrifice he made. Only now, his wife can't conceive. There's something medical preventing her to bear a child. And he remembers 'Hey, I still have that uterus... before we consider adoption, why not try that?' To me, this is an amazing act of love. Even though he doesn't WANT to, he loves his wife so much that he'll undo years of hormone therapy that have made him who he's always felt he was, and have a child for her. I think ultimately, THAT is what makes him happy.
It's wrong because while he may legally be a man, he isn't. If that's how they create their family, more power to them. Just don't jam it down my throat that a "man" had a baby
You're right. Biologically he is a woman. No one is denying that. This whole 'Man having a baby' thing is a product of media sensationalism. I'm curious, though. What if, instead of a person having a female to male sexual reassignment surgery on his own free will, this were a child born with both sex organs. He was born with both a penis and urterus? Because the penis is the outward sex organ, he was raised as a he and no one felt the need to perform a hysterectomy on the child? He's given hormone therapy for his whole life so that he can live as a man. And this man, knowing full well he was born with a uterus, is put into the same position. He concieves and delivers via cesarean. How does this differ?
And by the way, no one is shoving anything down anyone's throats. You choose to read the headlines, watch TV and read this thread. Other than that, blame the media. Not the couple who are creating a family.