- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 9,177
- Reaction score
- 225,008
Even Dr Quack said she had a personality disorder when answering the jury question. But he didn't say he explored it. LOL
As if that would have no bearing on her motivations for murder here.
Even Dr Quack said she had a personality disorder when answering the jury question. But he didn't say he explored it. LOL
Why is everyone so up in arms about the psychologist being paid ?Referring to him as Dr.$ The judge is paid, JM is paid, the defense is paid. Does anyone really expect that any professional witness is doing anything for free. And $250 an hour is not unreasonable. Again, why would anyone expect complete impartiality. He was hired by the defnese..not the court. I would be intersted though to know if the defense had had JA evaluated by anyone else and never shared that if the results were not to their liking.
I can't imagine being in her shoes either BUT I do know that if that was me sitting in the courtroom I would be, as another member posted earlier, on my knees begging Travis's family for forgiveness for what my child had done to their loved one, I would be sitting in that seat with my eyes focused on those participating in the court proceedings and not only would I be respectful and considerate of what Travis's family is going through, better believe that I would be demanding the same consideration from any of my family and friends who were in the courtroom also. I also wouldn't be running up to the bailiff and tattling on others who are reacting to the horrendous crime my child committed for ANY reason.
MOO, but I think "everyone is so up in arms" because his evaluation in this case gives all appearance that his "hypothesis" was delivered to him ahead of time by the defense team and he trumped up testing and everything else that he claims factors into his evaluation to arrive at that predetermined diagnosis. Normally, an expert would evaluate a defendant and THEN the defense would determine their course of action based on his evaluation. The cart doesn't normally drive the horse with medical professionals, unless they are borderline unethical and solely performing for personal gain.
I think RS was going to write a book and said this case would help him. Someone heard him say this outside the courtroom, maybe Dr Drew's Jurors?
I wonder if LaViolence is writing one?
Even Dr Quack said she had a personality disorder when answering the jury question. But he didn't say he explored it. LOL
I think the cart then the horse, in that order, crossed over that borderline back in NJ and went on a cross country pioneering expedition all the way to AZ with that wagon full o' unethics.![]()
I've been ambivalent about the global elephant sign as it really was just one of the sisters' symbols and I didn't know how it would apply to the whole family ya know? But then I just saw Samantha's letter to someone saying she had elephants all around her house as well (wild).
The only issue I have with these is they are kind of useless to use without backs to attach them with...thoughts? But I love the sentiment.
Yes, I was being far too kind in MY evaluation!! LOL!!
Who is RS?? :blushing:
MOO, but I think "everyone is so up in arms" because his evaluation in this case gives all appearance that his "hypothesis" was delivered to him ahead of time by the defense team and he trumped up testing and everything else that he claims factors into his evaluation to arrive at that predetermined diagnosis. Normally, an expert would evaluate a defendant and THEN the defense would determine their course of action based on his evaluation. The cart doesn't normally drive the horse with medical professionals, unless they are borderline unethical and solely performing for personal gain.
Son of Sam law will prohibit her from every profitting from the crime...I don't think she has enough money to file a wrongful death suit in a civil trial but maybe they will anyway to secure that. We didn't in our case.
Hello. I'm new here but I have a question for you katiecoolady: you said "But then I just saw Samantha's letter to someone saying she had elephants all around her house as well (wild)."
Could you please tell me where I could read that letter?
Thank you. Y'all have a really nice forum here!!
Unfortunately it hasn't prevented Jodi's family from "brokering" her pseudo artwork for monetary gain.
True. does anyone actually think people are buying her "artwork" for those amounts? It just seems to me like a big PR stunt.
True, but I didn't think it would be so obvious with the discarding certain disorders, the cards & book, and re-scoring tests. It also seems to me that he met her with PTSD already in mind. I just don't get any impartiality from him.
I find him hinky. (iPad auto-corrected that to hunky. No!!!)
I'd really love to know more about the cards. If it/they were for Nurmi, why would he give me to Jodi? Just mail'em!
Anyone have a link to the support page for BK?
Poor Jodi. Average looks, average artwork no one is purchasing and her parents didn't compliment her about, below standard student, but brilliant psychopath!