People, people, people! What does it matter what some pundit or talking head as to say about anything? YOU are watching the testimony and are as capable as anyone of making a determination about what you are seeing and hearing.
Actually, YOU are perhaps MORE tuned in to what a juror would be perceiving than any of the talking heads who have a formal law background.
Notice that Juan has toned down his "anger" today. Oh, he is so good at what he does, isn't he? Like he was really "mad" at Alyce last Thursday. Watch how he goes at her in such a subtle way. Making her look like the azz that she is in thinking she could put anything over on this Prosecutor.
Notice how Juan again today went straight back to Alyce's lack of education within her field? For those not familiar with the field of psychology and psychologists, no one who is anyone within the field would not have a Doctorate. Having a Doctorate within this field is the norm and anyone who does not have this level of education would not be respected by any legitimate peer. Anything they wrote would not be published in any peer-to-peer journal, unless they could be listed as a co-author with a more credentialed person.
Strange that this woman did not complete her education. But I think that lack of completion is what would have led to her conducting seminars based on the "catchy" title of "Was Snow White and abused woman?" She lacked the proper credentials to draw anyone in to hearing her speak.
I'd like to hear her questioned as to why she felt this "catchy" - and according to her testimony misleading - title was needed for her "keynote-or-not-really-keynote" addresses.
Remember the Peter Principle? About when a person reaches their highest level of incompetence? (President Richard Nixon was one of the finest examples).
Well, folks, Alyce is there. She has over reached. Juan is going to offer her an out that could possibly save her credibility for the remainder of her career.
Alyce should take the out.