AB's Involvement ptII

[raisincharlie]

Although LE has said through the warrants that AB's phone didn't show him in the areas (where Zahra was later found) on 25 September, I am curious as to if the records show him in those areas at another time close to that date. September 20 still remains an important date IMO.

 

[Mountain_Kat]

Although LE has said through the warrants that AB's phone didn't show him in the areas (where Zahra was later found) on 25 September, I am curious as to if the records show him in those areas at another time close to that date. September 20 still remains an important date IMO.

I would like to know if his cell phone pings show him in disposal areas from Sept 25 to Oct 9 .

 

[docwho3]

Unless his phone pings show him moving around in other innocent locations
(& assuming he didn't loan out his phone to someone else)
then his phone not pinging to the body part dump sites does not prove Adam was not there
but only that his phone was not there.

Then again I suppose he might have said to EB, 'You killed her so you bloody well go
and dispose of her.'

 

[tlcya]

Agreed. AB is not his phone. He could have been in area and left phone at home. He could have had phone with him and been pinging two counties away. He could have lent phone to someone else who was pinging two counties away. The day given by EB could be entirely the wrong day and nobodies pings on that day mean anything. We shall ahve to see what cards LE are holding I suppose. I think we may be waiting awhile for that peek at their card.

 

[Flakes]

My guess is they will have verified his location with independent witnesses. I'm mindful of the fact they have not arrested him, he is not charged with any crime relating to Zahra at this stage, so I assume this is partially owing to evidence the LE has uncovered regarding his whereabouts on the days that are being examined.