AL AL - Brittney Wood, 19, Mobile, 31 May 2012 - # 7

[zwiebel]

I'm not on facebook so I don't know exactly what you mean. But I can guess.

What you guys are saying is chilling me to the bone.

 

[KateB]

Short version, zwiebel. Both Brittney's father & stepfather via her child's father's facebook are being publicly hateful with implications & threats & retaliations over an implied attempted custody battle for the child.

 

[ChattyWoman]

World Wide Candle Lighting for Brittney ~ May 30 at 7:30 PM.

 

[reedus23]

I just now realized Wendy's total charges. So going off of the charges -SHE committed sexual abuse (IE the sodomy charge)? Can someone explain her charges?

Dustin Kent (and all of them) make me SICK

Section 13A-13-6 - Endangering welfare of child.

(a) A man or woman commits the crime of endangering the welfare of a child when:

(1) He or she knowingly directs or authorizes a child less than 16 years of age to engage in an occupation involving a substantial risk of danger to his life or health; or

(2) He or she, as a parent, guardian or other person legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than 18 years of age, fails to exercise reasonable diligence in the control of such child to prevent him or her from becoming a "dependent child" or a "delinquent child," as defined in Section 12-15-1.

(b) A person does not commit an offense under Section 13A-13-4 or this section for the sole reason he provides a child under the age of 19 years or a dependent spouse with remedial treatment by spiritual means alone in accordance with the tenets and practices of a recognized church or religious denomination by a duly accredited practitioner thereof in lieu of medical treatment.

(c) Endangering the welfare of a child is a Class A misdemeanor.

I think this charge speaks for itself and the 2nd section is what would apply.

Alabama Code - Section 13A-6-63: SODOMY IN THE FIRST DEGREE

(a) A person commits the crime of sodomy in the first degree if:

(1) He engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another person by forcible compulsion; or

(2) He engages in deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is incapable of consent by reason of being physically helpless or mentally incapacitated; or

(3) He, being 16 years old or older, engages in deviate sexual intercourse with a person who is less than 12 years old.

(b) Sodomy in the first degree is a Class A felony.

And deviate sexual intercourse is defined as:

Alabama Code - Section 13A-6-60: DEFINITIONS

The following definitions apply in this article:

(1) SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Such term has its ordinary meaning and occurs upon any penetration, however slight; emission is not required.

(2) DEVIATE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Any act of sexual gratification between persons not married to each other involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another.

She obviously did more than just cover up the crimes. Not sure if I need to explain more.

Alabama Code - Section 13A-6-65.1: SEXUAL TORTURE

(a) A person commits the crime of sexual torture:

(1) By penetrating the vagina or anus or mouth of another person with an inanimate object by forcible compulsion with the intent to sexually torture or to sexually abuse.

(2) By penetrating the vagina or anus or mouth of a person who is incapable of consent by reason of physical helplessness or mental incapacity with an inanimate object, with the intent to sexually torture or to sexually abuse.

(3) By penetrating the vagina or anus or mouth of a person who is less than 12 years old with an inanimate object, by a person who is 16 years old or older with the intent to sexually torture or to sexually abuse.

(b) The crime of sexual torture is a Class A felony.

She obviously used more than just her own body according to the allegations.

Alabama Code - Section 13A-6-69.1: SEXUAL ABUSE OF A CHILD LESS THAN 12 YEARS OLD

(a) A person commits the crime of sexual abuse of a child less than 12 years old if he or she, being 16 years old or older, subjects another person who is less than 12 years old to sexual contact.

(b) Sexual abuse of a child less than 12 years old is a Class B felony.

And sexual contact is defined as:

Alabama Code - Section 13A-6-60: DEFINITIONS

The following definitions apply in this article:

(1) SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Such term has its ordinary meaning and occurs upon any penetration, however slight; emission is not required.

(2) DEVIATE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Any act of sexual gratification between persons not married to each other involving the sex organs of one person and the mouth or anus of another.

(3) SEXUAL CONTACT. Any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person not married to the actor, done for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party.

Again, I think it kind of speaks for itself. The thing that obviously jumps out to me is that the victim was under 12.

 

[AstroKitty]

Thank you all so much! I guess what I was trying to nail down is that she's being accused of physically doing the sexual abuse - not just knowing about it and refusing to report. Correct? Again, I'm sorry for asking a very stupid question(s), I just don't want to assume anything.

 

[fabvab]

Thank you all so much! I guess what I was trying to nail down is that she's being accused of physically doing the sexual abuse - not just knowing about it and refusing to report. Correct? Again, I'm sorry for asking a very stupid question(s), I just don't want to assume anything.

I'm glad you asked that question because I was not 100% sure she was charged with physically abusing either. Now I know after reading the definitions of her charges. :stormingmad:

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Jesus... I sure did miss alot! There was a story done on Brittney & the skanks that surrounded her? Reading back now... Wowzers!

 

[Jersey*Girl]

From looking at the FOX10 screenshots of Facebook, these are private messages between Brittney and the alleged victim. Not posts that are made available for public view on Facebook. To me, they appear to be private Facebook messages.

If Brittney would have responded the other person would have record of the message. We did see one message from Brittney. Anyone who was messing with Brittney's FB would not be able to delete messages the victim received, only messages on Brittney's page. Now I am wondering where these messages came from? Did they find them on Brittney's page or did the victim save the messages? If the messages were saved on Brittney's page, then if CW and WWH did indeed login to Brittney's FB, they knew about the sexual abuse before LE charged anyone. Hmm, they would have had a heads up on who was about to be charged for raping a child. Absolutely mind blowing

Many, many people took screenshots from Facebook when this case broke. In my opinion, LE knows right where to go if they need anything.

Ya know what? I remember screen capturing every single thing I could find right when this story first broke. I'm talking EVERYBODY's stuff... When nasty crap started happening between posters, I deleted that album & stepped away, didnt want to be part of the drama. Now everything we suggested about these idiots is coming to light & I wholeheartedly regret deleting those captures now. I think it could shed some light. At least now we know why Wendy was so intent on hacking into Britt's voice mail & also her FB account!

Something to think about - Brittney used the Internet, she had to have access to a computer unless she used her phone for everything. She was on a family plan I thought with her Uncle Donnie & Aunt Wendy, then a short time before her disappearance she obtained a prepaid cell. I remember thinking to myself 'how convenient'. Maybe she had net use while on the family plan, but not when she went with the prepaid. That could explain her lack of response to her Facebook messaging on the 28th & 29th. Maybe she was meeting DH to confront him...or maybe he's the one that requested to meet her bc maybe he saw Britt's FB messages. I thought in the beginning it was said that Britt liked staying at her Uncle's house, something about the computer...I'll have to go to the beginning of the threads. Did Chessie have Internet when Britt went missing? Or was it shut off? Jeesh, I can't remember... Anyway, I always thought there was more to the story of why Britt suddenly went with a prepaid cell after being on a family plan for so long. Maybe that reason was bc Britt had net use on her cell plan supplied by WWH & DH, they caught wind of her corresponding with her cousin about this molestation/rape stuff so they cut her off...or maybe she's in it deeper than we all thought so she got a prepaid bc its harder to trace & easier to disappear. However, her cell battery found in DH's vehicle speaks volumes. I think he offed her & his disgusting cohorts helped to cover it up.

Brittney was net savvy regarding social media. She'd been on MySpace & Facebook for quite some time. Well what else was she on? If she used MS & FB, I'd think she'd have used Photobucket as well.

This whole case imvho is the epitome of an epic fail all the way through, every single facet of it.

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Looked at the video interview... Wow, the pain in her father's eyes is apparent. This man is probably feeling a ton of guilt for making the mistakes he has in the past & not being there to realize some of this chit was going on. I imagine he feels terrible for not seeing through Donnie & the others.

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Holy crap! Chessie knew Brittney went with Donnie the night she disappeared? Did she learn that after the fact or did she know it but kept it on the downlow? From what I'm reading, she found out Britt went with Donnie only after Britt's friend told her. Is this true? I'm trying to remember exactly when Chessie acknowledged that Brittney didnt walk to Donnie's but was instead picked up by Donnie... Anybody know the date she act knowledges this info with the public?

 

[Jersey*Girl]

I know some sleuth social media sites and was wondering if anyone came across this conversation Brittney had with the victim. I ask because if it wasn't seen them is it possible LE was working with Brittney and the conversation was deleted as they got their evidence.

I also wonder if the reporter happened to get any of the screen shots between the family right after that piece of crap was found shot to death. I hope LE has seen this info.

Still self editing my other thoughts to save the Mods the trouble.

That's a good set of questions. The way the screen shots flashed on screen didn't look right. It looked as though it was the mobile FB not the computer version. Don't forget the Chessie wanted her password something bad and did end up getting it - and does log into her account. wendy and chessie were more concerned about Brittney's password for her vm and fb than finding her.

Looked like fb private messaging to me, not something that showed up on a FB wall.

 

[Jersey*Girl]

From looking at the FOX10 screenshots of Facebook, these are private messages between Brittney and the alleged victim. Not posts that are made available for public view on Facebook. To me, they appear to be private Facebook messages.

If Brittney would have responded the other person would have record of the message. We did see one message from Brittney. Anyone who was messing with Brittney's FB would not be able to delete messages the victim received, only messages on Brittney's page. Now I am wondering where these messages came from? Did they find them on Brittney's page or did the victim save the messages? If the messages were saved on Brittney's page, then if CW and WWH did indeed login to Brittney's FB, they knew about the sexual abuse before LE charged anyone. Hmm, they would have had a heads up on who was about to be charged for raping a child. Absolutely mind blowing

Many, many people took screenshots from Facebook when this case broke. In my opinion, LE knows right where to go if they need anything.

Good question. Here's what I wonder...

I wonder if its possible Brittney called RSW to ask him about this stuff, he seemed the most approachable & least intimidating imo. Maybe RSW in turn decided to call it into the police to save himself, to be the first one to report it maybe trying to play the victim role. Maybe he wasn't arrested right away bc he was the one initially making the report so conveniently left himself out of it. Maybe even said something like why would he report it if he was involved, etc., something to make le think he wasn't involved. Maybe bc of the strong complaint against Donnie being the ring leader, and maybe if Britt was the one that started the whole ball rolling by asking RSW about this stuff, maybe Britt was offed bc she was thought to know more & being the initial whistle blower. Maybe bc the girl that said she was raped was younger than Britt, maybe Donnie thought he could do damage control with her and keep things under control. However, RSW being the initial person to report this makes things come together for me now. I think he did it to try to save his own azz, not to help those others that were molested. Maybe it backfired when police attempted to speak with Donnie. Maybe Donnie found out that Britt spoke with RSW about this so he killed her & either threw her in water or buried her somewhere. Her cell battery being found in his truck speaks volumes. This is all speculation...but gotta admit its plausible. I can't get over RSW was the one to start this all off reporting it to the police. I'm smacking myself in the head thinking damn now it all makes sense, ties it together for me. The young victim writing to Brittney was very brave. She should be commended. This beautiful young lady withoutadoubt saved many lives from being compromised of their innocence. Kudos young lady!

Only thing I'd wish for in hindsight is that I wish she would have called the cops herself right away. Then again, she might have been taught not to trust most adults, including cops, once her innocence was lost & nobody prevented it from happening. To have people that you've trusted violate you is despicable...especially the amount of them in this case. Holy crap!

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Plus RSW was in the service. Maybe Brittney questioned everything bc maybe with RSW being a serviceman, she may have placed him higher as far as being upstanding and such. Maybe she spoke with RSW about her cousin's claims bc maybe Britt believed it about the others but not RSW, so maybe she trusted him to ask him. Maybe RSW thought he could paint himself in a positive light by going to the police with this info, knowing he's been in the service for years so maybe thought they'd respect him, maybe he thought they'd trust his version more... Hmmm, sorta makes sense.

Only thing I'm confused about is the messages dated right before Brittney disappeared. Weren't we led to believe the investigation into Donnie started in February? Yes. So there's probably more messages...unless I'm confusing myself. I'll bet there's a ton more victims, too. So RSW went to cops in Feb? Do I have that right? Trying to piece it all.

Edit to add answer to my own question...

http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/special_reports/special-report-missing-brittney
Snipped:
It's a story that technically began February 26, 2012 when investigators said Brittney's uncle, Randall Scott Wood, called authorities to report the family sex abuse.

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Makes so much more sense now.

 

[Eileen730]

I have to say this, i completely disagree that their Grandmother was their safe place. There is evidence out there that shows she is/was just as bad, IMO as Chessie is. My personal opinion is Derek went there because she was the lesser of two evils at the time. Maybe she was cutting him more slack that Chessie, who knows. I do not believe Britt would call her Grandmother, at all. Just knowing what we do of the history there. JMO!

Wasn't G Ma married to the guy that raped BW? If you read the hometown FB page Wallace H says just that, and PH gives her money and she sends it to her EX the SOffender in jail.

This family never ceases to amaze me!

Chessie knows what has become of her daughter. I would not put it passed her having a hand in it also.

ALL JMVOO

 

[reedus23]

Thank you all so much! I guess what I was trying to nail down is that she's being accused of physically doing the sexual abuse - not just knowing about it and refusing to report. Correct? Again, I'm sorry for asking a very stupid question(s), I just don't want to assume anything.

Not a stupid question. Based on my reading their statutes, she is being accused of more than just knowing about it and refusing to report it. Arguably the endangering the welfare of a child charge could amount to simply that BUT the other 3 charges indicate that she was an active, physical participant with both her body and other inanimate objects. Trying to tap dance around what I think that means in the real world to avoid getting to graphic. Bottom line, tells me she is accused of physically doing the sexual acts, yes.

 

[Jersey*Girl]

you touched on ALL the points I wanted to bring up. I think we've been snowed this entire case. that's what I think. Her phone could not have pinged without a battery. The battery would have to have been physically removed, as the back of the phone wasn't found (consistent with it dropping and breaking). I think the battery is meant to throw people off - or DH put the phone with her body and took the battery out so she wouldn't be found. He didn't care when he took his own life.

But that makes me wonder if he wasn't meeting up with someone in a spot that is only known between *friends*. That person meets up with him and shoots him.

So far from all the stories - DH was the ring leader who *made* people do awful things (I don't buy it but whatever). I can only assume that RS told the LE about this because someone he loved was abused and that for him was enough. Maybe the person who wrote her.

What we do know is that people traded sex with DH for pills (drugs) and WH knew about it. I do think a lot of what was said here to be helpful back in the start is all bs. The truth lays with Chessie, Wendy and Donald, Dustin. I think ALL of them know what happened to Brittney. Chessie's choice of words in her interview, the way her eyes darted everywhere as she thought up her response = SHE KNOWS.

She said forever and a day that B left on foot
Now it's "She left with DH".

Well, which is it?! And her husbands' response to what he missed about Brittney?!@!?!? Her looks and her smile. Seriously? Creeper. Sorry if this earns me a time out but Brittney was better off with her dad and step mom.

And her brother almost began to say something (TJ) but stopped himself. His behavior was strange, I'm assuming he high. He obviously has nothing to do with it and is most likely at odds with both sides of the family.

JMO

This case infuriates me.

As usual, I agree with everything you just said. AstroKitty, I'm so glad you stuck around here, especially glad you continued to stay on Brittney's threads. You've been a total asset with your past experiences and opinions. Thank you so much for all of your contributions. What a wonderful thing it is to turn negative experiences into something positive in which others may learn from. :grouphug:

 

[Jersey*Girl]

Not a stupid question. Based on my reading their statutes, she is being accused of more than just knowing about it and refusing to report it. Arguably the endangering the welfare of a child charge could amount to simply that BUT the other 3 charges indicate that she was an active, physical participant with both her body and other inanimate objects. Trying to tap dance around what I think that means in the real world to avoid getting to graphic. Bottom line, tells me she is accused of physically doing the sexual acts, yes.

Tells me she's one seriously demented hosebag. That's a fo sho.

 

[ImWithTheBand]

Plus RSW was in the service. Maybe Brittney questioned everything bc maybe with RSW being a serviceman, she may have placed him higher as far as being upstanding and such. Maybe she spoke with RSW about her cousin's claims bc maybe Britt believed it about the others but not RSW, so maybe she trusted him to ask him. Maybe RSW thought he could paint himself in a positive light by going to the police with this info, knowing he's been in the service for years so maybe thought they'd respect him, maybe he thought they'd trust his version more... Hmmm, sorta makes sense.

Only thing I'm confused about is the messages dated right before Brittney disappeared. Weren't we led to believe the investigation into Donnie started in February? Yes. So there's probably more messages...unless I'm confusing myself. I'll bet there's a ton more victims, too. So RSW went to cops in Feb? Do I have that right? Trying to piece it all.

Edit to add answer to my own question...

http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/special_reports/special-report-missing-brittney
Snipped:
It's a story that technically began February 26, 2012 when investigators said Brittney's uncle, Randall Scott Wood, called authorities to report the family sex abuse.

Just jumping off your post. Remembering some past discussions:

Remember when RSW had some strangely timed Geocaching activity around the time of Brit's disappearance? With pics! Knowing NOW that he made the initial report, makes me wonder even more about his involvement with Brit's disappearance. One of his friends even interjected themselves in here pretty early, shouting about his innocence in all this, before any charges were made.

Per WH, there was a court order preventing DH from being around his child(ren). I want to think it was just one of the children specifically, based on comments by WH very early when she was unable to shut her trap. I wonder if this same child was the one messaging Brittney? (and later came forward) And it was thought, by DH/WH, that one of them was controllable, and one of them wasn't?

Just some more things to make my mind mushy, trying to wrap it around these people and what they could be capable of.

Everything MOO and stuff

 

[Jersey*Girl]

http://www.fox10tv.com/

Part 1 Video up now!

http://www.fox10tv.com/dpp/news/special_reports/special-report-missing-brittney

Part 2 is up! Click the videos link

Is there anyone else out there with a tablet who can point me to part 2 of the video? I can't find it in the video gallery and the videos won't play for me from the news page about Brittney.

Part 1 was eye-opening. Just from that I'm finding it very hard to reconcile what LE first said about Brittney's disappearance and what they are saying now. It just seems a complete contradiction to me.

Zwiebel ~ reading your last few posts, it sounds like you found both parts -
If not, this post by gliving has the link to both Part 1 and 2. Thanks gliving!

I think Andrew Perez, from Fox10TV, did a great job putting this together.
Thank you Andrew!!

Hi Chatty. Please could you help me out as I'm unable to pull up the 2nd part. The only video showing in all links is part 1 of the interview by Andrew Perez. Am I overlooking it? I'm trying to view part 2 but have been unsuccessful in pulling it up. I thought maybe the 1st interview just flowed into the 2nd interview but it doesn't. At the end of the video it says stay tuned for part 2...