IF my broken hinky meter arse HAD to guess, I would lean towards homicide. Moo.
But homicide isn’t always murder. It can also include giving someone something that causes them to accidentally die.
IF my broken hinky meter arse HAD to guess, I would lean towards homicide. Moo.
Well, she directly says she doesn't know the people she is with, so that seems pretty clear they were framed as strangers.I guess that’s possible. But I don’t know. Wouldn’t that person know that someone could’ve seen them leaving the bar? And why not add more detail like, “I met these two guys and they said they’d give me a ride. But they’re acting weird and I’m starting to feel afraid.” Something that actually makes it clear she’s with strangers and not a friend or associate?
I'm not convinced of the OD theory but it seems plausible because:Based on her text I don’t understand why there’s such strong speculation that she died of an overdose. Just having a drug history isn’t enough for me.
I’ve found that people looking to get high with hard drugs are pretty single minded. They’re focused. Not nervous. This text makes it seem like she left with a couple of predators.
Also, how did they find the body? Did someone talk?
Fairly safe statement!I'm guessing 99.3% of bodies found in shallow graves are homicides
But homicide isn’t always murder. It can also include giving someone something that causes them to accidentally die.
My understanding is that last contact was the text message and she never called the friend. The friend called her in the morning and went straight to voicemail.IMO the text is exactly as is seems. She sensed something was off and wanted to make sure someone was aware. I don't think there is much else to read into. Did she eventually try to call that friend? (Not sure if I missed it, this thread has been going so fast) If she did and the friend didn't answer, than leads me to one scenario. If she did not try to make contact with anyone after that, the situation could have escalated before she could react/defend herself/call for help. I'm just trying to think what is the most logical. All MOO, of course.
Someone who was not thinking very clearly and in panic mode. Someone attempting to connect the dots to the alleged 2 black men she left with. MooWhy would someone involved in either her death or in covering up her death (meaning they didn’t want to get caught) send a highly concerning text that would immediately alert the recipient to the situation and cause people to start looking and examining what happened?
That doesn’t make sense.
We’ve seen texts from other people using victim’s phones. They’re never like that. They’re always meant to deflect attention and alarm. Not to cause it.
I feel that if she could text she could dial 911 and hope they track her. I don’t think she sent the text.Did she have a drug history? Why would she have texted she was in trouble if this was about overdosing?
100% agree. It makes no sense. Usually the texts sent by a person other than the victim are meant to stall for time or deflect. Not cause alarm.
Yes. She left bar at 10:45 and sent text at 12:15. Reportedly (don’t remember where I read this) her friend was already asleep and missed the text.Do we know how long after she left the bar that the text was sent? I’m sorry I’m behind with posts.
My understanding is the text message was sent a bit after midnight, so well over an hour after she left the bar.Jumping off this, perhaps the crime was already committed, and the intent was to deflect by implicating someone else? That’s why I was asking about how long after she left the bar that text was sent.
Person(s) who texted was in CYA mode.Still trying to catch up here but I wonder, if the person who hurt/buried her did send that text, why?
Why would a person with hurtful motives, send a text to someone from her phone, warning the person that PH might be in danger? Almost seems like a brazen, catch me if you can sort of thing. It makes more sense to send a lying text that said something like "having a great time, see you in a few days" or something more misleading like that (which actually does happen, we've all followed cases I'm sure). I suppose phone company records of PH's phone as well as the friend's phone who received this text, would clear this up a little? (I realize I may have missed something, I've tried to read all the posts & articles but there's a lot to catch up on).
100% agree. It makes no sense. Usually the texts sent by a person other than the victim are meant to stall for time or deflect. Not cause alarm.
Yes. She left bar at 10:45 and sent text at 12:15. Reportedly (don’t remember where I read this) her friend was already asleep and missed the text.
I’m not sure if this has been mentioned, but if in trouble, wouldn’t you give a location of some sort? Or a first name? Or vehicle description? This is something I’ve done in the past when I’ve had car trouble and wasn’t sure my car would make it, etc. At least a street name, or some sort of identifiable factor? If it was her who sent the text, why did she leave out other information if she really thought she could be in trouble? I know that I have sent info about my uber drivers, etc. if I felt uncomfortable.
ETA: I see @Momma2cam just mentioned something similar.
Though I understand your concern, it can be very hard to protect an adult from themselves.
This reminds me of a time I went to a dance club with co workers. Most left early. I was tired and don't like dance clubs.
A female co-worker was then befriended by a trio of Hispanic men. They spoke little English. My friend, though hispanic, did not speak Spanish. I am white, but speak Spanish.
The trio gave me vaguely bad vibes:
- Switched from profanity amongst themselves to politeness when speaking to my co worker.
- "Evaluated" women at the club using demeaning terms in Spanish.
Anyways, my co worker wanted to stay. Staying met more contact with these men. I could not find the others we came with. I explained to her my concerns about them. She just nodded and said "Ok".
I was worried, but nothing bad happened. I could have stayed longer, but in the end, when an adult says they want to do "X", in most circumstances, there is little a friend can do.
IMO this may not be a typical "perp". If it was an unintentional accident gone wrong that lead to intense panic and worry, I could see someone sending a text to support whatever cover story one quickly surmised. The intent would be for the same purpose as the "non alarming" texts in that it takes eyes off of what really may have occurred and who was involved and directs attention elsewhere. MOOEvery case I've ever followed, where the perp sent the text pretending to be the victim, the text was never alarming or really remarkable at all. Other than maybe using a phrase or spelling a word wrong that the victim would never use or misspell. I suppose this case might be the exception, but I tend to doubt it.
moo & all the various & assorted disclaimers![]()
Indeed it does happen, but the perp doesn't alert the receiver intentionally. They attempt to assure the receiver all is well. The whole point is to stall for time so there is no worry about the victim.Person(s) who texted was in CYA mode.
We have seen it in other cases where the perp makes texts to family members and friends after the fact.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.