I don't have a link and can't confirm it, but it's a little odd that President Obama was in Mexico the same time this flu was reported there. The man who greeted him at the museum he visited is said to have died the day after of flulike symptoms.
What makes you think that?
I don't have a link and can't confirm it, but it's a little odd that President Obama was in Mexico the same time this flu was reported there. The man who greeted him at the museum he visited is said to have died the day after of flulike symptoms.
The prep school students had been to Mexico the week before I believe. I don't know about Ca., Tx., and Kansas but if we go to Walmart we don't know who all there may have been in Mexico or has family who have visited from Mexico recently. Especially in Texas or California.
this is a great google map of suspected (pink) cases and confirmed (purple) cases of this strange new strain of influenza (which consists of influenza a, influenza b, avian, european swine & asian swine - who or what cooked that combo up!!!)
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=U...22809,-111.357422&spn=35.796953,63.896484&z=4
(bold above by me)I don't trust our world governments. The world is over-populated. I think they would like to see many of us die.
Aside from that, I believe the pharmaceuticals sometimes engineer diseases, so they can make a lot of money on medication.
Then there's the odd thing about all the microbiologists that have died/been killed over the last few years.
Plus, the fact that it would be hard for the combining of swine, avian, and human flu to occur naturally.
(bold above by me)
I left my aluminum foil hat in the bomb shelter with my other survival gear so I'll pass on commenting on the first three items except to point out that when the 1918 Flu Pandemic (possibly the worst disease pandemic in human history) occurred there wasn't world government, global pharmaceuticals, or microbiologists to engineer a conspiracy. The flu virus itself wasn't even isolated until fifteen years later. If you're really desperate for a conspiracy feel welcome, but it just isn't needed to account for the situation.
[Respectfully snipped]
A 'normal' flu year kills half a million people, approx. 30,000 in the U.S. alone. If flu got a fraction of the press that salmonella in pistachio nuts got then respirator masks would be mandated by law.
Pandemics are a regular occurrence, happening every 10 to 20 years.
Its already resistant to the two oldest Anti-viral drugs.
WHO also issued the statement that the current situation constitutes a public health emergency of international concern. And, I am concerned.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_20090425/en/index.html
Excellent post! :clap:
I just need to add to your comments about the 1918 Pandemic. The 1918 Pandemic was caused by a strain of the flu, but all the flu virus did was open the door, so to say, for bacterial pneumonia, which is what killed most of the people in that pandemic. Had there been widely available antibiotics, the number of deaths in the 1918 Pandemic would have been drastically reduced, quite possibly to the same mortality rate numbers we observe on average today.
And you hit the nail on the head with the "normal," or seasonal, flu. WHO estimates that between 250,000 and 500,000 people die EACH year world wide and the media ignores this statistic in the name of ratings.
What the media fails to mention is that somewhere between 250,000 to 500,000 people die worldwide each and EVERY year from the normal, plain old "garden variety" seasonal flu. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/index.html
There have been 80 deaths attributed to the swine flu worldwide, so far, in Mexico and none in the confirmed cases in the United States and New Zealand. I think the main reason that Mexico had so many deaths is because the availability of health care and medications is no where near what it is here in the United States and other developed nations. In addition, I'm not sure how many of those 80 deaths,are attributed directly to the swine flu or other causes that may have cropped up after infection with the virus. WHO reports that 59 people in Mexico City died from pneumonia, not swine flu. http://www.who.int/csr/don/2009_04_24/en/index.html
This strain has yet to come anywhere near this number and I doubt it will. Even the WHO and the CDC are saying that the strain has yet to display high transmission rates between humans, which means this strain could quite possibly die out fairly quickly.
For those repeating misinformation: The UK case is NOT "swine flu." http://uk.reuters.com/article/usTopNews/idUKTRE53P0M820090426
For those referencing the 1918 Pandemic, the majority of those deaths were NOT from the flu. They were actually caused by bacterial pneumonia: http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal...ost-deaths-in-1918-flu-pandemic_10086380.html Had there been widely available antibiotics in 1918, we would not have seen mortality rates anywhere near what they were, since most of the deaths were caused by a bacterial infection after transmission of the flu virus, NOT from the flu itself!
Although I agree wholeheartedly to take adequate precautions (thorough hand washing, don't put your fingers in or around your mouth, etc.), I do not agree with the alarmist mentality that you must stay inside, stop your normal activities, and wash your foods/products that may have come from Mexico with bleach water! It's a tad bit over reactive, if you want my honest opinion. Just stay vigilant and wash your hands!!!
Here is a fact sheet from the WHO, for anyone that may be interested: http://www.who.int/csr/swine_flu/swine_flu_faq_26april.pdf