Amanda Knox found guilty for the murder of Meredith Kercher in Italy #15

[LinasK]

If I were Amanda Knox, I too would fight every step of the way as much as I could to avoid extradition. Why would anyone want to be in prison especially if they didn't commit a crime? She is fully justified in fighting any extradition.

BTW, being stupid and/or narcissistic and/or unlikable is not a crime nor is it evidence showing guilt or innocence.

This case is nothing like CA or JA or JVS.

But she did commit it and she is just like Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias, just as narcissistic(JVS too, but to be fair, we'll stick with the female murderers). Most criminals are-they are not honest, the behaviors show consciousness of guilt.

 

[LinasK]

Amanda is an odd duck. She is not comfortable speaking. That is obvious.

I think this will be reversed again. This court had nothing new and nothing more than the Appeals court when it found her and RS not guilty.

And yet the original conviction was GUILTY. There was no corrupt prosecutor to blame this time. The evidence stands, so will this conviction!

 

[Linda7NJ]

No they probably won't be rude to your face, but there is a discernible difference. I've heard loads of talk about the US as a nation tht would definitely not be said to a US tourist one doesn't know well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Agree totally. I have a few friends that were born there but moved here at a young age. They understand the language but can't speak it without an American accent. ( two different friends& 4 languages) When they visit their own homeland ...they "overhear" a lot being said that they weren't supposed to be able to understand....and it's not flattering.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Linda7NJ]

I thought she seemed perfectly comfortable speaking on the morning show today. She's obviously upset, but she did not seem nervous to be in front of cameras, wasn't struggling to get her point across.

Maybe I didn't notice but - did she once ever say "I didn't do this"? Or was it just "I was found innocent of this before!"?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

It was a performance and a very poor one. IMO
No oscar nomination for Knox.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Linda7NJ]

:drumroll: Surprise . . . Surprise !





:seeya:

I'm thankful "Plan B" was thwarted!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Madeleine74]

But she did commit it and she is just like Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias, just as narcissistic. Most criminals are they are not honest, the behaviors show consciousness of guilt.

No.

None of her DNA is in the victim's room, which is THE crime scene. Can't say that about Arias or Anthony. Knox wasn't carrying a dead body around in the trunk of her car for a few days (like Anthony). Knox didn't change her hair color, rent a red...errrr...white car, drive over 1,000mi, steal a gun, take pictures and (oops) actually show her in the middle of committing murder (like Arias). Oh and Arias left a bloody palm print at the scene, her hair all over TA's room (unlike Knox). None of those other cases have anyone else's DNA (Rudy Guede anyone?) on/in the victim, in the victim's room.

No. Not the same thing at all.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

No.

None of her DNA is in the victim's room, which is THE crime scene. Can't say that about Arias or Anthony. Knox wasn't carrying a dead body around in the trunk of her car for a few days (like Anthony). Knox didn't change her hair color, rent a red...errrr...white car, drive over 1,000mi, steal a gun, take pictures and (oops) actually show her in the middle of committing murder (like Arias). Oh and Arias left a bloody palm print at the scene, her hair all over TA's room (unlike Knox). None of those other cases have anyone else's DNA (Rudy Guede anyone?) on/in the victim, in the victim's room.

No. Not the same thing at all.

BBM: Just because a person's "dna" is not in the room where a victim is found, does not mean that person wasn't in there ...

Remember: Knox's LAMP was found IN Meredith's room -- and wiped clean !

As to THE crime scene : It was not limited to just the bedroom where Meredith was murdered ...

The ENTIRE cottage was declared a "crime scene" : footprints leaving the bedroom ... blood in Knox's bathroom and on the bathmat ... the STAGED broken window .... the list goes on ...

:moo:

 

[chlban]

Reporters should report the news and not their "opinions", IMO.

Yeah, cuz that always happens. Fox news or MSNBC certainly have no bias.
(Sarcasm extremely heavy)

I happen to agree with the article. The news media has bought into the BS. They are not just reporting the news either they are shading it with the "poor little American girl" nonsense.

 

[Linda7NJ]

No.

None of her DNA is in the victim's room, which is THE crime scene. Can't say that about Arias or Anthony. Knox wasn't carrying a dead body around in the trunk of her car for a few days (like Anthony). Knox didn't change her hair color, rent a red...errrr...white car, drive over 1,000mi, steal a gun, take pictures and (oops) actually show her in the middle of committing murder (like Arias). Oh and Arias left a bloody palm print at the scene, her hair all over TA's room (unlike Knox). None of those other cases have anyone else's DNA (Rudy Guede anyone?) on/in the victim, in the victim's room.

No. Not the same thing at all.

But she did tell lie after lie after lie.

But she did point the finger away from herself ...at an innocent and was content for two weeks to let him rot in jail. Hey, as long as she got away with it though right?

But she did attempt to mislead the police

But she did stage the scene

But she did act bizarrely afterwards. In ways incongruent with the way normal people react. She was all about self soothing, self absorbed and sexualized behaviors.

Hmmmm when I think of more she has in common with Casey & Jodi I'll update the list.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Madeleine74]

BBM: Just because a person's "dna" is not in the room where a victim is found, does not mean that person wasn't in there ...

You're absolutely right! So what else could be at a scene...

- fingerprints (any found inside the BR?)
- footprints (any found inside the BR?)
- hairs (any found inside the BR?)
- fibers (any found inside the BR?)

You have victim and one defendant living in the same apartment, sharing the same bathroom. One should expect there to be physical evidence of both in the apartment. The bedroom is where MK was killed.

 

[Gardenlady]

But she did tell lie after lie after lie.

But she did point the finger away from herself ...at an innocent and was content for two weeks to let him rot in jail. Hey, as long as she got away with it though right?

But she did attempt to mislead the police

But she did stage the scene

But she did act bizarrely afterwards. In ways incongruent with the way normal people react. She was all about self soothing, self absorbed and sexualized behaviors.

Hmmmm when I think of more she has in common with Casey & Jodi I'll update the list.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yup and not just lie after lie but also, like many an American later found to be guilty, first thing she did was finger a black man for the crime.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

 

[Linda7NJ]

Yup and not just lie after lie but also, like many an American later found to be guilty, first thing she did was finger a black man for the crime.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

I find that just so offensive and sickening.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Madeleine74]

Again, where are the interrogation tapes? Interrogation notes? Video? Anything?

<all I hear are crickets chirping in response>

 

[Linda7NJ]

You're absolutely right! So what else could be at a scene...

- fingerprints (any found inside the BR?)
- footprints (any found inside the BR?)
- hairs (any found inside the BR?)
- fibers (any found inside the BR?)

You have victim and one defendant living in the same apartment, sharing the same bathroom. One should expect there to be physical evidence of both in the apartment. The bedroom is where MK was killed.

This has all been discussed to death. No, disrespect... but I am not going to rehash it all. Please do not take my lack of responses as some sort of admittance that I'm "stumped." I not, I'm just making a choice. And I rather be honest than ignore these sorts of post.

I'm looking forward and hoping for swift and complete justice. IMO that means Amanda behind bars in Italy.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[LinasK]

No.

None of her DNA is in the victim's room, which is THE crime scene. Can't say that about Arias or Anthony. Knox wasn't carrying a dead body around in the trunk of her car for a few days (like Anthony). Knox didn't change her hair color, rent a red...errrr...white car, drive over 1,000mi, steal a gun, take pictures and (oops) actually show her in the middle of committing murder (like Arias). Oh and Arias left a bloody palm print at the scene, her hair all over TA's room (unlike Knox). None of those other cases have anyone else's DNA (Rudy Guede anyone?) on/in the victim, in the victim's room.

No. Not the same thing at all.

Their victims were different, their MO's were different- Casey's was a bloodless kill and we don't know where she killed Caylee. There are still many, many similarities in their coverups, their choices of wording, and their sexualized behavior, including Foxy Knoxy's buying lingerie immediately afterward- no matter whether it was a Target-type store or not- Target still sells lingerie.
All of these murderesses threw innocent people under the bus and slandered them. All of them attempted to mislead the police and blatantly lied.

 

[LinasK]

This has all been discussed to death. No, disrespect... but I am not going to rehash it all. Please do not take my lack of responses as some sort of admittance that I'm "stumped." I not, I'm just making a choice. And I rather be honest than ignore these sorts of post.

I'm looking forward and hoping for swift and complete justice. IMO that means Amanda behind bars in Italy.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed! AK's supporters want us to retry all the overwhelming evidence again. That's been done for years here at WS. I took a break for many years because it became too much to follow all the minutia. The judges did examine it all and concluded she was GUILTY. Why is it so hard for others to accept that this is a just verdict???

 

[Jessica2012]

Why didn't she take the lie detector that she "did not think is necessary" but was fine with taking?

 

[Madeleine74]

When I look at a case I look at evidence. Statements and the context around statements are very important (to me). I don't have any of that in this case. I looked at this case years ago. I'm not a newb to it.

There is ample physical evidence...evidence that proves it was Rudy Guede who was in that apartment that night, in MK's bedroom that night, and had a sexual encounter with MK that night. Guede is the one with a prior. When I look for evidence that shows who was in MK's BR, Guede is the only one who cannot be ruled out.

Based on evidence at the scene and inside MK's bedroom, I am certain Guede is the attacker, the killer, the thief. No doubt whatsoever with him.
And that's as far as I can go, based on the physical evidence that seems to be accepted by all sides.

I don't support Amanda Knox. I don't know her or Raffaele, but I can say with certainty I don't have evidence that can take me past reasonable doubt, I have no proof of what was said in the interrogation (again, where are the tapes? transcripts?). I can only work with what I can see/hear/read/discern.

 

[Gardenlady]

Guede was a thief, not a murderer, so I don't put very much stock his priors. I have no idea exactly what his involvement was on the night of the murder (I can't seem to settle on one scenario), but there is a difference between a break in thief and a murderer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

 

[LinasK]

When I look at a case I look at evidence. Statements and the context around statements are very important (to me). I don't have any of that in this case. I looked at this case years ago. I'm not a newb to it.

There is ample physical evidence...evidence that proves it was Rudy Guede who was in that apartment that night, in MK's bedroom that night, and had a sexual encounter with MK that night. Guede is the one with a prior. When I look for evidence that shows who was in MK's BR, Guede is the only one who cannot be ruled out.

Based on evidence at the scene and inside MK's bedroom, I am certain Guede is the attacker, the killer, the thief. No doubt whatsoever with him.
And that's as far as I can go, based on the physical evidence that seems to be accepted by all sides.

I don't support Amanda Knox. I don't know her or Raffaele, but I can say with certainty I don't have evidence that can take me past reasonable doubt, I have no proof of what was said in the interrogation (again, where are the tapes? transcripts?). I can only work with what I can see/hear/read/discern.

Guede may have had the strongest prosecution case- noone disputes that. Everyone thinks that he is guilty, but he did NOT act alone. The judges found ample evidence that Amanda & Rafe were guilty too. There are other posters here who may be kind enough to rehash it all for you.