I suppose it depends on how much sway Nencini has over this jury of professional and lay judges, and what they themselves believe about the totality of evidence. I think we can't really know.
Sollecito will be in court for the ruling, and he deserves credit for this bravery.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/30/w...italian-court-ruling.html?ref=amandaknox&_r=3Knox Opts for Absence as Italian Court Nears Ruling in Murder Trial
FLORENCE, Italy — For six years, the fate of Amanda Knox has been in the hands of a succession of Italian courts, called on to determine whether on the night of Nov. 1, 2007, she brutally killed her 21-year-old roommate, Meredith Kercher, like Ms. Knox a foreign exchange student in the picturesque hilltop university town of Perugia. On Thursday, a court in Florence is expected to offer its ruling.
Ms. Knox will not be present in the courtroom. She will await the verdict in her hometown, Seattle, where she has lived ever since an appeals court reversed her murder conviction in October 2011, overturning an earlier decision. Last year, the Court of Cassation, Italy’s highest court, vacated the appellate court ruling and ordered a new trial, which began last fall, putting Ms. Knox — and her former boyfriend and co-defendant, Raffaele Sollecito — back in the limelight. [...]
.....Ms. Knox said that while they believed that she was her own best defense, her lawyers had advised her not to attend the trial.
“They said, ‘If you go to the court they’re going to be paying attention to you — they’re going to be looking at your face, they’re going to be trying to read your gestures, they’re not going to be listening, and that is a huge problem,’ ” said Ms. Knox, whose appearance in court became a fixation of the world’s media during the Perugia trials.
Yes, but as of this morning, Dr. Sollecito announced he has asked his son to be in the court room with him for the verdict, and he has complied.From what I've heard Raffaele's father said his son will be home in Puglia.
The lay juries would have to vote not guilty unanimously to overcome the judge and his assistant. Given that the judge advises and leads the panel, highly unlikely.
From what I've heard Raffaele's father said his son will be home in Puglia.
The lay juries would have to vote not guilty unanimously to overcome the judge and his assistant. Given that the judge advises and leads the panel, highly unlikely.
Hard drive was damaged. Laptop wouldn't start. They had to repair it.
Most welcomeThanks much SMK.
:laugh:My daughter was stationed at Aviano a few years ago and would Skype me to have a drink with her. I'm not much of a drinker but DH always said "It's 5 o'clock somewhere". Very strange...but we'll never forget it LOL.
Most welcomeIf they deliberate fairly quickly, we may awaken to a verdict tomorrow in the US.
Ha, true. Yes, I am getting the same feeling.I can't believe this day is finally here and my daughter has a dentist appointment tomorrow! Thank goodness for smart phones!
I honestly feel as if it could go either way, this case is greatly divided on the Internet. No reason to believe that jurors won't be divided as well.
Excerpts from The Forgotten Killer
While more than a dozen books have been written about the death of Meredith Kercher, nearly all of them have paid scant attention to the certain perpetrator whose DNA was found in, on, and around the victim in multiple locations at the crime scene. No viable DNA evidence was ever detected at the crime scene indicating the presence of anyone else. The absolute impossibility of selectively removing DNA of two out of three murderers from a bloody crime scene has not stopped a cottage industry of obsessed conspiracy theorists from ignoring the sole perpetrator in this horrific tragedy.
Preston, Douglas; Douglas, John; Olshaker, Mark; Moore, Steve; Heavey, Judge Michael; Lovering, Jim; Wright, Thomas Lee (2014-01-27). The Forgotten Killer: Rudy Guede and the Murder of Meredith Kercher (Kindle Locations 42-46). . Kindle Edition.
Steve Moore on the investigation:
Because of all this, I feel that I say authoritatively that what passed for an investigation, interrogation, and forensics in Perugia was nothing more than going through the motions to make people believe that the police, forensic investigators, and prosecutors knew what they were doing.
The conclusions and prosecutions in the Kercher murder investigation were based solely on (flawed) intuition, profound ignorance about the science of investigation, social and religious bias, superstition, corruption, and self-preservation.
As I began to delve into the case, I learned to my dismay that the investigation was botched at a level I have rarely seen outside of totalitarian or Third World countries. The forensics, “interrogation,” and conclusions of the detectives were at best completely and nightmarishly wrong, and at worst, intentionally corrupted. As a result, several innocent people had been caught up in the investigation like dolphins in a tuna net.
Preston, Douglas; Douglas, John; Olshaker, Mark; Moore, Steve; Heavey, Judge Michael; Lovering, Jim; Wright, Thomas Lee (2014-01-27). The Forgotten Killer: Rudy Guede and the Murder of Meredith Kercher (Kindle Locations 589-592). . Kindle Edition.
Junk Profiling
For reasons steeped in flawed intuition, differing cultural norms, and superstition, detectives in Perugia almost immediately focused on Amanda Knox as the target of their investigation. It was this “junk profiling” that caused them to believe that because she didn’t weep for the victim in public, she didn’t weep in private. This lack of public display of grief caused them to falsely believe she killed her friend. The fact that different cultures, and even different people within those cultures, deal with shock and grief in different ways apparently did not occur to them.
Preston, Douglas; Douglas, John; Olshaker, Mark; Moore, Steve; Heavey, Judge Michael; Lovering, Jim; Wright, Thomas Lee (2014-01-27). The Forgotten Killer: Rudy Guede and the Murder of Meredith Kercher (Kindle Locations 623-624). . Kindle Edition.
Put yourself in Amanda's position. If you were innocent and had already spent 4 years of your life in an Italian prison for a wrongful conviction, would you trust the Italian court to get it right? Would you therefore risk further imprisonment by going back for the trial knowing that you probably would not be extridited by staying in the US? In that case, I would do exactly what AK is doing and stay home.
As Italy is 6 hours ahead of us, and it will begin at 9 am there, it will be 3 am EST/New York City time. The defense will speak for an hour, then deliberations begin.