Angelina Jolie

  • #121
deandaniellws said:
Well, I vote for waiting AT LEAST until the divorce is final...or in the very least until it is filed....to get pregnant. I am sorry...this is NOT a class act.:sick:
You have no proof of when Angelina's baby was conceived, only your suspicions, sounds just like Dr. March's theory of conception in the Scott Peterson trial- I wouldn't base my reputation on it!

P.S. Brad has NO obligations to his EX-wife to tell her of a child with his new wife!!!!!
 
  • #122
LinasK said:
You have no proof of when Angelina's baby was conceived, only your suspicions, sounds just like Dr. March's theory of conception in the Scott Peterson trial- I wouldn't base my reputation on it!

P.S. Brad has NO obligations to his EX-wife to tell her of a child with his new wife!!!!!
LOL...I will be getting back to you when the child is born. :laugh: Also, when a married man gets another woman pregnant when they are still married..yes honey, it IS the the obligation of the husband to let his wife know.
 
  • #123
And another thing: a long time ago Gwyneth Paltrow left BP because he was 'boring'.

i think JA possibly found him 'boring' too because he wasn't a party animal like she. he wanted to do the family thing and settle down. how boring is that for JA, i wonder?

AJ, on the other hand, while having a wild, wild past had, in fact, gotten herself together with a family life and 'settled down' by adopting Maddox and having plans to adopt a new baby (soon to arrive Zahara). (she ditched Thornton when it became apparent he wasn't father material for Maddox.)

BP met her at this stage (when he really, really wanted a family). he and JA were falling apart having different lifestyle goals (JA wants to be a movie star and is going at it hell for leather even tho she's really cut out to be a telly star). he is already a movie star and AJ doesn't have anything left to prove careerwise (Oscar, anyone?) and wants babies.

i wouldn't be surprised if she doesn't just finish up her work commitments as of now and waves goodbye to film sets for herself, concentrating mainly on the role of mother and life partner (probably marriage) with BP and doing what she can for her UN role.
 
  • #124
  • #125
  • #126
  • #127
Floh said:
Ha! i really hadn't seen that pic before. fairly clear that isn't one beer too many, eh? :dance:
Yep..that side view shows she is VERY pregnant.
 
  • #128
LinasK said:
And this proves what???:waitasec:
She is VERY pregnant. Can you not follow the conversation?:laugh: Reread the previous posts if you got lost.
 
  • #129
deandaniellws said:
She is VERY pregnant. Can you not follow the conversation?:laugh: Reread the previous posts if you got lost.
Size DOES NOT prove date of conception, weight gain/gestational diabetes, genetics, or multiple births. Are you her OB? Do you know something the rest of us don't? Were you there when she conceived?

P.S. Dr. March also tried to claim that Conner Peterson was older than he really was based on size, when in reality he was probably just a very big baby...
 
  • #130
LinasK said:
Size DOES NOT prove date of conception, weight gain/gestational diabetes, genetics, or multiple births. Are you her OB? Do you know something the rest of us don't? Were you there when she conceived?

P.S. Dr. March also tried to claim that Conner Peterson was older than he really was based on size, when in reality he was probably just a very big baby...
LOL. Like I said...I will be getting back to you when the baby is born. ;) I bet I am right. We shall see.:D :D :D
 
  • #131
LinasK said:
And this proves what???:waitasec:


That she has to be the hottest pregnant woman, like, EVER! :D

Cal
 
  • #132
deandaniellws said:
By reading your posts...you don't seem like you have a very strong relationship with your partner. JMO

Actually to the contrary.....

I am 35 (yuck) and met my wife when I was 15. We dated for many years and got married in 1992. We have two great kids and in general I couldn't be happier.

I was merely being honest that there is someone else that just somehow...for some reson....drives me insane. It's just too bad I am not mormon and that I don't live in Utah....okay well and that I don't look like Brad Pitt! :D

Cal
 
  • #133
Floh said:
i think JA possibly found him 'boring' too because he wasn't a party animal like she. he wanted to do the family thing and settle down. how boring is that for JA, i wonder?
Wow. That's the first I've heard about JA being a "party animal".
 
  • #134
LinasK said:
Size DOES NOT prove date of conception, weight gain/gestational diabetes, genetics, or multiple births. Are you her OB? Do you know something the rest of us don't? Were you there when she conceived?

P.S. Dr. March also tried to claim that Conner Peterson was older than he really was based on size, when in reality he was probably just a very big baby...

:clap:... :clap:... :clap:
 
  • #135
IdahoMom said:
Wow. That's the first I've heard about JA being a "party animal".

i've read on more than one occasion, in the past, that Jen liked the hollywood parties, the red carpet & all that stuff....i've read that Brad would soon just stay at home & eat pizza....he was the same way w/Gwenyth Paltrow...Brad's not the big party guy, but from what i've read, Jen is...
 
  • #136
deandaniellws said:
Well I guess it all depends on why kind of a man a woman wants. I wanted one to take care of me and be the boss. I can ask for the moon and he gets it for me....no questions asked. If he asks me to do something...I hop to it, and deliver with a smile. He wanted a woman who would run the house and take care of his kids. I was more than happy to do so. I wanted a man who I didn't ever have to wonder where he was or what he was doing. I can ALWAYS trust him...he has never let me down by doing something else. Now that all the kids are gone (in college and grown) we are like two teens in love. I think it is all a give and take...with the partners letting each other know EXACTLY what they want. I can't imagine having a relationship any other way. I love my man!!!!:D And I know the feeling is mutual. So I think your post is a little off. Life isn't all about the sex. The sex is the icing on a well baked cake. I mean...after all...what is a birthday cake without the candles!?!!? Ya know what I mean? ;)

Good for you. You go girl!
 
  • #137
deandaniellws said:
08/22/05: Citing irreconcilable differences, dissolution papers were filed with a Los Angeles court by the couple on August 19, 2005. The court documents note that Jennifer Aniston's maiden name was restored.

Now.....I bet if we count back when that baby is born ....we might find the reason for those papers. She looks almost 5 months or so......
Was thinking the same thing!
 
  • #138
Hbgchick said:
Maybe she DID want kids. Then after a year or two of marriage Brad started showing his true colors, and perhaps she didn't want to bring a child into a marriage that wasn't rock solid just so he could have what he wanted at the very moment he wanted it. If that's true, more power to her. Way too many people think that if their marriage isn't solid, that they should have a couple of kids to "fix" it....:banghead:

i agree with this statement, but i think that when a man or woman gets closer to 35-40 they start seriously thinking about children, if they don't have any already....i believe children/family life is what Brad wanted with Jen & she made him think that's what she wanted also....she kept making movies & putting it off...i read somewhere that when Friends was over, she was the one the most upset over it...i don't believe that Jen should have gotten pregnant JUST to make Brad happy, but i do believe that when it got down to the nitty-gritty about having a family, she backed out & her priority was her career.....i'm glad he found Angelina..
 
  • #139
ember said:
I could go on & on about this because I get so sick of everyone bashing Angelina. She should not have to defend herself as a decent person. Let her actions for the lesser of the world speak for her. If we are judged as to who we are as a person by our relationship practices, then I think there's a whole lot of us falling short of saint. She didn't make Brad do anything he didn't want to do. Jen just didn't have what it took to keep him.

i couldn't have said it better!!
 
  • #140
ember said:
And your point would be????

It's Ok to speculate on what Brad did wrong, but not Jen because we're not "privvy" all of the sudden to what she did wrong but we are so "privvy" to what he did wrong? :croc:

OR

That I am a horribly selfish being because I'm not afraid to find my own happiness? Sorry, but I'm not the "Co-dependent" type. I don't need someone else to fulfill me or make me happy. I meet my own needs. I think you'd find that my spouse is certainly glad to be my spouse because he can be who he is and I love him for that. He hunts, I don't eat meat. We are total opposites in some ways, totally alike in others. So my situation does not even apply in the context you used it in. We are discussing them, not me. You'd do well to remember that. Like I said previously, your spouse needs to share your needs, part of that is respecting who you are as a person. Brad needed children, obviously, to make him content. Jen floundered on that issue.

excellent response, imo....you & calus_3 make extremely good observations & i agree with all of them...
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
849
Total visitors
975

Forum statistics

Threads
632,435
Messages
18,626,478
Members
243,149
Latest member
Pgc123
Back
Top