The idea that someone would think to do that seems laughable to me but I suppose stranger things have happened.Honestly, all someone (the killer) had to do was read Websleuths, realize Wes made the perfect patsy then start setting him up.
The idea that someone would think to do that seems laughable to me but I suppose stranger things have happened.Honestly, all someone (the killer) had to do was read Websleuths, realize Wes made the perfect patsy then start setting him up.
I'm kind of lost. Can you explain further?I think tunnel vision is hard to break one you start down that path, trying to fit everything with the suspect you have in mind.
I went back to thread one and started reading. It's amazing how the tone of this case changed.
Follow the facts.
I'm kind of lost. Can you explain further?
Do you have any other theories that can be posted?Everyone is so focused on Wes being involved in AJs death that they try to fit everything they know into a theory that fits him and toss aside anything that doesn't work with him as a suspect.
Read from thread 1, you will see where open minded discussion leads. Once tunnel vision sets in, opinions do 180* turns. This all without a POI.
If Wes killed AJ, I hope he rots in prison, please don't mistake me for defending him.
Thank you, I see what you are saying now!Everyone is so focused on Wes being involved in AJs death that they try to fit everything they know into a theory that fits him and toss aside anything that doesn't work with him as a suspect.
Read from thread 1, you will see where open minded discussion leads. Once tunnel vision sets in, opinions do 180* turns. This all without a POI.
If Wes killed AJ, I hope he rots in prison, please don't mistake me for defending him.
Do you have any other theories that can be posted?
Everyone is so focused on Wes being involved in AJs death that they try to fit everything they know into a theory that fits him and toss aside anything that doesn't work with him as a suspect.
Read from thread 1, you will see where open minded discussion leads. Once tunnel vision sets in, opinions do 180* turns. This all without a POI.
If Wes killed AJ, I hope he rots in prison, please don't mistake me for defending him.
Everyone is so focused on Wes being involved in AJs death that they try to fit everything they know into a theory that fits him and toss aside anything that doesn't work with him as a suspect.
Read from thread 1, you will see where open minded discussion leads. Once tunnel vision sets in, opinions do 180* turns. This all without a POI.
If Wes killed AJ, I hope he rots in prison, please don't mistake me for defending him.
There is no POI, so I'll keep it vague.
I will say I think it was someone AJ knows and didn't view as a threat. I think she was strangled out of anger and rage.
Maybe it's just me (I don't claim to know the law), but for LE to keep WH with no bond over those petty charges, says a lot to me. They wouldn't just keep him in jail so he wouldn't interfere any further, would they??
I've actually had the same thought myself. And then... because it would be SO easy to set Wes up (criminal history, etc.) an after-the-fact plan went into action. With assistance. Of course it sounds far-fetched, but so does half the idiocy we've already seen come to light in this case.
Felon in possession of a firearm is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
He didn't have a firearm. Just ammo, IIRC.
He didn't have a firearm. Just ammo, IIRC.
He didn't have a firearm. Just ammo, IIRC.
Huh, shot of organic caffeine-free tea, maybe. [emoji4] [emoji6]Whenever anyone says the word "felon" I'm gonna take a shot. Ready? Set? Go!!
I think tunnel vision is hard to break one you start down that path, trying to fit everything with the suspect you have in mind.
I went back to thread one and started reading. It's amazing how the tone of this case changed.
Follow the facts.