Could you provide me a credible online link that the DNA mixed with blood was "degraded", and if it was degraded how were they able to get the necessary markers?
Possibly. For right now, I think the best thing for you to do is to go up to where it says "search" and type in degraded DNA. This site is a treasure trove of articles and book excerpts and the like. (The Jedi archives have nothing on this place!) I'll look on my end.
As for how they were able to get the necessary markers from a degraded sample, that's even more interesting:
1) The methods of testing have improved so greatly. There was an interview with someone (exact name escapes me--Kobalinksy, I think) who said that the sample itself had not improved, merely that the testing had gotten better.
Which leads me to 2) They DIDN'T get all the necessary markers. Even with quantum leaps in technology, they were only able to finagle 10.
Degraded DNA in her fingernails did not have enough DNA markers for a forensic usefulness AFAIK.
That is correct.
Whatever kind of contact JB may have had w/this unknown male, her contact w/JR, BR, PR, Whites was more recent and of longer duration, so their DNA would either be also present along with unknown DNA.
DNA is a very quirky thing, voynich. It's a much bigger mystery than we sometimes think.
The last individuals JB came into contact with were her family and the Whites, so for this RDI spin to work, their DNA needs to also be present.
Like I said, not necessarily. That's not just my opinion, either.
Thoughout the entire movie, till the end, Agent Smith always referred to the ONe as Mr. Anderson. The ONe always spoke of himself as NEO. IT became a kind of Dun Moch for Smith to call him Mr. Anderson.
Ah. Very well. Do you know why I linked mine?
Oh I linked it b/c you can talk about the RST, and you asked me why the RST didn't cite McM and RST this and RST that. Why didn't RST trumpet Amy's rapist? Why did the RST go after Tom Miller?
I KNOW why they went after Tom Miller. I figured that one would bother you, because it raises an important question: if the Rs are so innocent, why did their shysters feel the need to sabotage potential witnesses? But I digress.
If we want to bring justice to JB, we need to use the best available scientific and forensic evidence to reconstruct what happened to JB.
Agreed.
I happen to accept that the DNA was most likely left by an intruder,
Well, I don't, but I agree it is possible. There's something else you might want to consider: it seems to me that by putting so much weight behind the DNA, IDI has effectively limited itself. I mean, if a suspect comes along and matches up with everything else, but NOT the DNA, they'll have to let him go. It's that simple. Lacy learned that lesson (or SHOULD have) the hard way when JMK came along. Of course, he DIDN'T match up in all other regards--far from it. But you know what I mean I hope.
and that McM linguistic analysis is based on solid science, and rules out the R's as the author.
To me, it's no more solid than handwriting analysis, which has been around a lot longer. But you don't seem to accept THAT when it pegs her. Sounds like an impasse.