GUILTY AR - Beverly Carter, 49, Little Rock, 25 Sep 2014 - #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
  • #182
CGasvVcUAAEeFfF.jpg

Shannon Miller ‏@_ShannonMiller 1h1 hour ago

Arron Lewis set to appear before judge this morning for omnibus hearing. #arnews
where these 2 gentleman were sitting, there are 2 church type court benches on each side. There were other cases to be heard also. In the area where the lawyer in blue shirt is there ended up being about 20 people! and about 10 prisoners sat in the jury chairs.

In front of me was a reporter I think Ark Dem Gaz. The 2 reporters tweeting had to either be in the foyer or sitting at in the bench behind Beverly Carter family.
DISCLAIMER THIS IS ALL MY OPINION FROM OBSERVATION SITTING IN THE COURTROOM. 6/1/2015 830am approx. 1 hour.
 
  • #183
Beverly Carter murder suspect Arron Lewis in court

http://www.katv.com/story/29205201/beverly-carter-murder-suspect-arron-lewis-in-court

(snip)
Channel 7's Elicia Dover will have more at 5 & 6 on KATV.


my hand to god that's about all worth snipping...........they should hire mimi! terrible update imo and it was nine minutes ago.............

oh well, link for later.......
Not only reporting from the courtroom, but Mimi has dug up more "facts" than the reporters about this case. WS has some amazing people and I go here before media links to check up on a case. jmo.
 
  • #184
Daaaaaaannnggg!!!! Thank you so so so so so much!!!!!!! That is a looot of stuff those pathetic tweets left out! I love having someone who can give us an accurate report! Thank you. Also, yours is the only photo I saw of him. Good job! woot wooot! I am glad the judge is being kind but keeps asking him about an attorney. That judge knows this dude likes to sue. He will eventually say he wasnt offered an attorney or something. Thats crazy!

The 4 videos concern me, as does the "that attorney didnt want to tarnish her image" thing. Attorneys dont care about that. They do what they have to in order to get their client off. Unless it is just a way to be cruel to someone without having actual evidence to support the claim. Thats what I think he is doing. Hes trying to say things that wont be admissable, but you wont be able to unring the bell. Maybe is he having a change of heart about Crystal? He doesnt want to be represented by the same agency?
 
  • #185
  • #186
So, do we think he is insinuating that he has video of BC on his phone?

AND wouldn't the police have already seen all the video on his phone? Don't they have ways to gain access without having the code/password?

Thanks for the great play by play Arkansasmimi!

Your welcome.

This is just my opinion:

The cell phones per VI Nojusticenusa, told us the phones were in Crystal Lowery name. We also know for fact from LEO that they got the info on number (forget the name of the thing where change the phone #) They got that info on Saturday, Sept 27, and started surveillance on the house on Sunday morning.... AL leaves... has the wreck ... goes on run...

SO, again just my opinion... Legally they could get that info since it wasn't in Arron Lewis name (disclaimer don't know law so my assumption). Crystal allegedly gave them her phone and password. IF Pros get the info from AL phone, they have to turn over to AL.
If it is something not favorable to the case and beneficial to the defendant they have to give to AL. (I think that is a Brady violation if don't may be wrong). I am thinking maybe they didn't get the info from his phone.

BUT what I learned today is... IF THEY DIDNT GET THE INFO FROM HIS PHONE they still probably have the records. And whatever is on CL phone. Pros said they didn't think there was anything on the laptop they got from Arron and Crystal home that they were going to use.

Looks like it all comes down to if Arron agrees to trust someone. All I know is he said quote "those 4 videos on his cell phone will shed a whole new light on the situation" Take it for what you will. JMHO
 
  • #187
Mimi....was CL in court today as well?

Well... let me say this as modestly as possible. I don't know. I had to go to the little girls room and then decided to go home. If she was there, its very possible that she could have had someone there with her. But the judge said after AL left the courtroom, that he realized most everyone was there for AL pretrial. And that if anyone wished to leave do it now please. Everyone got up from the gallery except the media reporter, and a few individuals that were awaiting someone in the courtrooms hearing. Now there could have been someone in the hall or one of those very few left. But I didn't go back in. I would think she would have been, unsure when she would have a pretrial if not. But the reporter sitting in front of me was speaking to several lawyers, he made reference to one as being Brett Qualls, so I thinking that was him. But he is a public defender so could have been there for another individual.

There was 2 bus from the Jail, the first had males on it. It left then the sedan with AL came up few min later, there was another bus with inmates coming, I assume females. I went inside after AL arrived. Glad I did lol. There was a female inmate in the group so she came on 2nd bus .
 
  • #188
snipped Maybe is he having a change of heart about Crystal? He doesnt want to be represented by the same agency?

That's what I was wondering too. Because if she has half a brain she is going to shove all she can on him. I would think he would do the same.
 
  • #189
Daaaaaaannnggg!!!! Thank you so so so so so much!!!!!!! That is a looot of stuff those pathetic tweets left out! I love having someone who can give us an accurate report! Thank you. Also, yours is the only photo I saw of him. Good job! woot wooot! I am glad the judge is being kind but keeps asking him about an attorney. That judge knows this dude likes to sue. He will eventually say he wasnt offered an attorney or something. Thats crazy!

The 4 videos concern me, as does the "that attorney didnt want to tarnish her image" thing. Attorneys dont care about that. They do what they have to in order to get their client off. Unless it is just a way to be cruel to someone without having actual evidence to support the claim. Thats what I think he is doing. Hes trying to say things that wont be admissable, but you wont be able to unring the bell. Maybe is he having a change of heart about Crystal? He doesnt want to be represented by the same agency?
Arron just asked where the attorney would come from... and asked PC PUB DEF? It was just normal back and forth. The Judge said no because they were already representing his wife. So prob be the State Pub Defender ...

We don't know whats on the videos he didn't say. Only that it would shed a new light on the situation.
 
  • #190
JMHO, depending what is on the 4 videos and something else I was thinking, maybe wrong on that.
But thinking out loud
IF the videos were to show Beverly leaving on her own, then that could get the Kidnapping charge a not guilty verdict. (I don't know what is on and mean no hard just saying a what if)
And iirc the Capital Murder one of the qualifiers was the Kidnapping. So it could very well make a difference.

Also forgot to add : AL STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH CRYSTALS ATTORNY BEING THERE WHEN/IF THEY EXTRACT THE DATA FROM HIS PHONE. He said and someone impartial. < I would want the same if I were in that spot. JMHO
 
  • #191
Capital Murder


(a) A person commits capital murder if:

(1) Acting alone or with one (1) or more other persons:

(A) The person commits or attempts to commit:

(i) Terrorism, as defined in § 5-54-205;

(ii) Rape, § 5-14-103;

(iii) Kidnapping, § 5-11-102;

(iv) Vehicular piracy, § 5-11-105;

(v) Robbery, § 5-12-102;

(vi) Aggravated robbery, § 5-12-103;

(vii) Residential burglary, § 5-39-201(a);

(viii) Commercial burglary, § 5-39-201(b);

(ix) A felony violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, §§ 5-64-101 — 5-64-508, involving an actual delivery of a controlled substance; or

(x) First degree escape, § 5-54-110; and

(B) In the course of and in furtherance of the felony or in immediate flight from the felony, the person or an accomplice causes the death of any person under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life;

(2) Acting alone or with one (1) or more other persons:

(A) The person commits or attempts to commit arson, § 5-38-301; and

(B) In the course of and in furtherance of the felony or in immediate flight from the felony, the person or an accomplice causes the death of any person;

(3) With the premeditated and deliberated purpose of causing the death of any law enforcement officer, jailer, prison official, firefighter, judge or other court official, probation officer, parole officer, any military personnel, or teacher or school employee, when such person is acting in the line of duty, the person causes the death of any person;

(4) With the premeditated and deliberated purpose of causing the death of another person, the person causes the death of any person;

(5) With the premeditated and deliberated purpose of causing the death of the holder of any public office filled by election or appointment or a candidate for public office, the person causes the death of any person;

(6) While incarcerated in the Department of Correction or the Department of Community Correction, the person purposely causes the death of another person after premeditation and deliberation;

(7) Pursuant to an agreement that the person cause the death of another person in return for anything of value, he or she causes the death of any person;

(8) The person enters into an agreement in which a person is to cause the death of another person in return for anything of value, and a person hired pursuant to the agreement causes the death of any person;

(9) (A) Under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, the person knowingly causes the death of a person fourteen (14) years of age or younger at the time the murder was committed if the defendant was eighteen (18) years of age or older at the time the murder was committed.

(B) It is an affirmative defense to any prosecution under this subdivision (a)(9) arising from the failure of the parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to provide specified medical or surgical treatment, that the parent, guardian, or person standing in loco parentis relied solely on spiritual treatment through prayer in accordance with the tenets and practices of an established church or religious denomination of which he or she is a member; or

(10) The person:

(A) Purposely discharges a firearm from a vehicle at a person or at a vehicle, conveyance, or a residential or commercial occupiable structure that he or she knows or has good reason to believe to be occupied by a person; and

(B) Thereby causes the death of another person under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.

(b) It is an affirmative defense to any prosecution under subdivision (a)(1) of this section for an offense in which the defendant was not the only participant that the defendant did not commit the homicidal act or in any way solicit, command, induce, procure, counsel, or aid in the homicidal act's commission.

(c) (1) Capital murder is punishable by death or life imprisonment without parole pursuant to §§ 5-4-601 — 5-4-605, 5-4-607, and 5-4-608.

(2) For any purpose other than disposition under §§ 5-4-101 — 5-4-104, 5-4-201 — 5-4-204, 5-4-301 — 5-4-308, 5-4-310, 5-4-311, 5-4-401 — 5-4-404, 5-4-501 — 5-4-504, 5-4-601 — 5-4-605, 5-4-607, and 5-4-608, capital murder is a Class Y felony.


History. Acts 1975, No. 280, § 1501; 1983, No. 341, § 1; 1985, No. 840, § 1; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-1501; Acts 1987, No. 242, § 2; 1989, No. 97, § 1; 1989, No. 856, § 1; 1991, No. 683, § 1; 1993, No. 1189, § 2; 1995, No. 258, § 1; 1995, No. 800, § 1; 2003, No. 1342, § 5; 2007, No. 827, §§ 19, 20.
http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=1364
 
  • #192
  • #193
  • #194
JMHO, depending what is on the 4 videos and something else I was thinking, maybe wrong on that.
But thinking out loud
IF the videos were to show Beverly leaving on her own, then that could get the Kidnapping charge a not guilty verdict. (I don't know what is on and mean no hard just saying a what if)
And iirc the Capital Murder one of the qualifiers was the Kidnapping. So it could very well make a difference.

Also forgot to add : AL STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH CRYSTALS ATTORNY BEING THERE WHEN/IF THEY EXTRACT THE DATA FROM HIS PHONE. He said and someone impartial. < I would want the same if I were in that spot. JMHO

Well, we went through the kidnapping thing a good bit on the A. Hernandez thread (minor, so not using name). Even if she went with him willingly, once he restricts her movement/ prevents her from leaving, then the kidnapping begins. She could be willing to go with him AND he still gets a kidnapping charge. Luckily!

EDITED TO ADD- no one gets duct taped on a date, so at some point, her mvement was restricted, for sure. Maybe he also thinks if she went with him, then there is no kidnapping. Thats not the case. Ariel Castro's victims went willingly with him, but they were certainly kidnapped.
 
  • #195
JMHO, depending what is on the 4 videos and something else I was thinking, maybe wrong on that.
But thinking out loud
IF the videos were to show Beverly leaving on her own, then that could get the Kidnapping charge a not guilty verdict. (I don't know what is on and mean no hard just saying a what if)
And iirc the Capital Murder one of the qualifiers was the Kidnapping. So it could very well make a difference.

Also forgot to add : AL STATED THAT HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH CRYSTALS ATTORNY BEING THERE WHEN/IF THEY EXTRACT THE DATA FROM HIS PHONE. He said and someone impartial. < I would want the same if I were in that spot. JMHO

I too am simply speculating about the video. According to your notes his previous attorney has said he doesn't want to tarnish Beverley's memory, so it can't be just her seen leaving. Maybe AL promised to let her go if she says things on video what he wanted to hear. Like she had to do like she is seducing him, or asking to threat her some way, so he can say that this was some kind of erotic game which simply got out of hand. Although I think an attorney would jump to use something like that to his defense, so I'm back to square one.
 
  • #196
Your welcome.

This is just my opinion:

The cell phones per VI Nojusticenusa, told us the phones were in Crystal Lowery name. We also know for fact from LEO that they got the info on number (forget the name of the thing where change the phone #) They got that info on Saturday, Sept 27, and started surveillance on the house on Sunday morning.... AL leaves... has the wreck ... goes on run...

SO, again just my opinion... Legally they could get that info since it wasn't in Arron Lewis name (disclaimer don't know law so my assumption). Crystal allegedly gave them her phone and password. IF Pros get the info from AL phone, they have to turn over to AL.
If it is something not favorable to the case and beneficial to the defendant they have to give to AL. (I think that is a Brady violation if don't may be wrong). I am thinking maybe they didn't get the info from his phone.

BUT what I learned today is... IF THEY DIDNT GET THE INFO FROM HIS PHONE they still probably have the records. And whatever is on CL phone. Pros said they didn't think there was anything on the laptop they got from Arron and Crystal home that they were going to use.

Looks like it all comes down to if Arron agrees to trust someone. All I know is he said quote "those 4 videos on his cell phone will shed a whole new light on the situation" Take it for what you will. JMHO

I KNOW THEY CAN get the data off of AL phone, because they did on Trayvon Martins phone. His phone was locked. Cellebrite was sent the phone (TM) and they got info off. Then the main IT person for Duvall County FL, after looking at info realize that he had more info than the Cellebrite people. TONS.. Long story short, the State didn't turn over the info to the defense. The only way they knew is that Ben Kruidbos was afraid he was going to get in trouble because he knew, and told the States Attorney and they didn't do anything. So he was a whistle blower. He was fired the day GZ was acquitted. Ben Kruidbos filed a lawsuit and Angela Corey filed counterclaim. Few days ago, the judge dismissed States counter claim with prejudice. Trial moving forward. Google for more info on that.

What is it they say about lawyers, Don't ask a question you don't know the answer to. Maybe the Pros didn't get info because didn't know the answer.
jmho
 
  • #197
Whatever happened, Beverly Carter didn't bind herself with duct tape and bury herself in a shallow grave. That I feel certain is a fact. But I will say JMHO
 
  • #198
I too am simply speculating about the video. According to your notes his previous attorney has said he doesn't want to tarnish Beverley's memory, so it can't be just her seen leaving. Maybe AL promised to let her go if she says things on video what he wanted to hear. Like she had to do like she is seducing him, or asking to threat her some way, so he can say that this was some kind of erotic game which simply got out of hand. Although I think an attorney would jump to use something like that to his defense, so I'm back to square one.

The impression I got, was the prev attorney hasn't seen the 4 videos either. AL was upset because AL wanted the attorney to say XYZ and attorney wanted to say ABC. AL said the attorney didn't want to tarnish Beverly memory. AL said there are delicate questions to be asked. We don't know to whom that they would be asked of though. Or the questions.
 
  • #199
The impression I got, was the prev attorney hasn't seen the 4 videos either. AL was upset because AL wanted the attorney to say XYZ and attorney wanted to say ABC. AL said the attorney didn't want to tarnish Beverly memory. AL said there are delicate questions to be asked. We don't know to whom that they would be asked of though. Or the questions.

I forgot to thank you arkansasmimi for you excellent notes.
In my imagination AL could have told his attorney what those 4videos would depict. Otherwise he wouldn't think it would tarnish Beverley's memory. But it could have happened different way too. I'm just speculating.
I too agree that for sure BC couldn't have duct taped and brought herself an buried herself especially at a place which has a connection to AL.
 
  • #200
Suspect in Pulaski Co. Realtor Killing Attends Pretrial Hearing

http://www.arkansasmatters.com/stor...ing-attends-pret/41396/7dWG0Dtbh0OHVX3WxVLl5Q

(snip)
Lewis was asking for a co-counsel, access to a laptop computer and a cellphone.

The judge told Lewis he must make the requests in writing and gave him a week to do so.




eta.........same story also at: http://www.fox16.com/story/d/story/...laski-co-realtor/88953/UhQ7QHYQPEW0kVXrbD7Y8Q

FYI they are both owned by same company now. KARK 4 (NBC) & FOX 16
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
103
Guests online
1,677
Total visitors
1,780

Forum statistics

Threads
636,237
Messages
18,693,134
Members
243,577
Latest member
Beautifully_Broken
Back
Top