GUILTY AR - Beverly Carter, 49, Little Rock, 25 Sep 2014 - #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #841
Thanks for all of your postings Mimi!
Are they trying to state that the search warrant wasn't valid? On what grounds?
 
  • #842
Thanks for all of your postings Mimi!
Are they trying to state that the search warrant wasn't valid? On what grounds?

Your most welcome.

I think those are probably routine Motions, a Def attorney would make. To preserve the record. We dont have Affidavits for Probable Cause or the Search Warrants for all these Motions to look at what is referenced. For me its just some new stuff to look at.

Another thing I think many have wondered as well as myself. Why they didnt have something to hold AL on since he was on Parole and a person of interest. From looking at these Motions, #4 for example. Which is Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence from AL car... we know from the info we saw in the Mental Exam page 8
Information obtained from the Affidavit for Warrant of Arrest for Arron M. Lewis, Facts
Constituting Probable Cause :

7 . On September 2S,z}l4,Investigators executed a Search Warrant on the 2014 Ford
Fusion Lewis was driving. Investigators found duct tape, a baseball bat, and rope in the
vehicle. http://www.arkansasonline.com/documents/2015/feb/26/aaron-lewis-mental-evaluation/

This was Sunday Sept 28, 2014 prior to them finding Beverly in the shallow grave bound with duct tapec early morning of Tues Sept 30, 2014.

JMHO maybe the stuff they found in AL car along with the Textme fake number, fake names was enough to obtain Kidnapping charge? Just thinking out loud.

So the Defense is doing what they do and challenging stuff what I thinking.

ETA: as far as Search warrants... appears to me there were many and in the Motions they tell which ones they are bring up with issues. I been looking up the cases referenced, learn something new all time. Hopefully useless information ;)
 
  • #843
10/09/2015
11:41 AM SUBPOENA RETURN BY PROSECUTOR
Entry: KEEPER OF RECORDS, 11-16-15, OH @ 8:30 AM
Images No Images
https://caseinfo.aoc.arkansas.gov/c...=P&case_id=60CR-14-3928&begin_date=&end_date=

JMHO, looks like the Pros has had the Keeper of one of the records for the OH on Nov 16 -I thinking ATT because that was who Beverly Carter carrier was, but jmo as of what records is not listed.

Jmo, I think this is to argue against the Motion #17 which the Def wants to Suppress physical evidence that was based on overreaching use of Pros subpoena power. Motion states
8. The prosecutor subpoenas issued in this investigation were issued for the law
enforcement investigation and not for the prosecutor's investigation. This Court should suppress
the information discovered as a result. Multiple decisions have held that evidence obtained by an
abuse of the prosecutor's subpoena should be suppressed. Cook v. State, 274 Ark. 244, 623
S.W.2d 820 (1981); Foster v. State, 285 Ark. 363, 687 S.W.2d 829 (1985).
WHEREFORE, the defendant requests this Court to suppress and exclude all evidence
obtained as a result of the overreaching use of the prosecutor's subpoena. https://contexte.aoc.arkansas.gov/i...resent2?DMS_ID=CWJ8CZB48F5OHJQ63MRK6S1GAG6DAM

But from the Mental Exam, we see that Investigators got reports using exigent circumstances...but we do not have access to the information used to get those. Since this was during the LEO investigation, unsure on how the Pros could issue the subpoenas for that prior part of the case. I was thinking the Pros subpoenas on the Docket were for the Keepers of Records to come to court and testify the authenticity of the records. But again, I have no legal education on how this stuff works, and we dont have those actual affidavits and subpoenas to look at.

Page 8. http://media.arkansasonline.com/news/documents/2015/02/26/CK_Image.pdf

2. Investigators conducted an exigent circumstances ping through AT&T for Beverly
Carter's cell phone number of 501-944-1559. Investigators reviewed the data and
determined that Beverly Carter's cell phone plnged twice in the area north of Steel Bend
Road and south of Smarty Jones Drive at1822 hours.
3. On September 27,2}l4,Investigators determined through Beverly Carter's phone
records that she placed a phone call at approximately 1558 hours to phone number 914-
206-1776 for approximately fifteen minutes and forly five seconds.
4. Investigators determined that the phone number 914-206-1776 retumed to a company
called*TextMe, [nc." TextMe, Inc. is texting and phone application that provides
smartphone users with free text and voice message, assigning them a unique phone
number.
5. An exigent circumstances request was placed with TextMe, fnc. And they provided a
report detailing that the achral cell phone number assigned to (914) 206-1776 was in fact
(501) 687-3833 belonging to a Crystal Lowery of 165 Randall Drive in Jacksonville, AR.
Further research into Beverly Carter's phone records revealed that she and/or the person
using (501) 637-3833 communicated via text messaging numerous times however the
text message content had been deleted from the victim's cell records only leaving a
record of the data transaction. Investigators also determined that Crystal Lowery and her
husband, Aaron Lewis, have a black 2014 Ford Fusion registered to them.
 
  • #844
:thinking: So was the initial LEO investigation for Beverly cell or all 3 cell records. I didnt realize that CL service was also most likely ATT. Google search shows other carriers as possible Sprint and Verizon and maybe a few others. But so far only Textme, ATT and Google have been Subpoena by the docket list anyway. SO jmho I guess we dont know when CL/AL records were searched. (with info we have avail)
just realized too from last quote
Further research into Beverly Carter's phone records revealed that she and/or the person
using (501) 637-3833 communicated via text messaging numerous times however the
text message content had been deleted from the victim's cell records only leaving a
record of the data transaction.

But if they have CL phone and AL phone, unless they also deleted those from their phones they should have the full convo correct? And that whole icloud or however it is called, would Beverlys text messages also go to that in those cases too? Would they be deleted from there if deleted from her phone only? Hopefully any text were preserved there to get the full picture needed.
 
  • #845
Something else that puzzles me...
We see in the docs in the Mental eval and from info listed in the Motions to Suppress that 165 Randall was searched on Sunday Sept 28, 2014.

Going back, we were told from VI1 and VI2 that home was also searched that day Sept 28, 2014. It is to be assumed (at least by me) that CL went back and was living in the home during the month prior to her arrest. She was selling items on online yard sales (according to VI1) for extra money.

I haven't seen where it was stated that house was searched again after CL was arrested Oct 30, 2014 (specifically). VI1 also stated when she was telling us about CL friend cleaning out the home, that LEO left it in a mess when she (friend over CL estate helping) recd the key back when they were done. So I am going to "assume" the home was searched again, after CL was arrested Oct 30, 2014. That would be only way that the home would be in a mess from LEO, a month after the orig search, correct? IF so, wonder what else was found? Most likely much we wont hear that pertains to CL as she has plead Guilty. Maybe it will come out in trial. JMHO
 
  • #846
Going back thru the documents from AL suit against Pulaski County Sheriff Office, there is a lot of info didn't catch first couple times around.

When Sgt Cedric Roy arrested AL at the apartment complex, Roy asked AL "where's your Buddy" and AL said he wasn't going to speak without an attorney.

Also, we were told by VI2 that CL was met at the ATM on Monday .. it was at about 10 a.m. Same time that AL arrived at the PCSO Jail. AL documents also state he was told CL was also there when he was being questioned on Sept 29th.

Why would Sergeant Roy ask AL where his buddy was if CL had been to the Sheriff office on Sunday? Or was there someone else? View attachment 82842 jmho
 
  • #847
This explains pretty simply worded what Exigent circumstances mean. And since Beverly Carter was missing and believed to be taken against her will, LEO were working quickly to find her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exigent_circumstance

Criminal procedure
In the criminal procedure context, exigent circumstance means the following:

An emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect, or destruction of evidence. There is no ready litmus test for determining whether such circumstances exist, and in each case the extraordinary situation must be measured by the facts known by officials.[1]
more at link
 
  • #848
Your most welcome.

I think those are probably routine Motions, a Def attorney would make. To preserve the record. We dont have Affidavits for Probable Cause or the Search Warrants for all these Motions to look at what is referenced. For me its just some new stuff to look at.

Another thing I think many have wondered as well as myself. Why they didnt have something to hold AL on since he was on Parole and a person of interest. From looking at these Motions, #4 for example. Which is Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence from AL car... we know from the info we saw in the Mental Exam page 8
Information obtained from the Affidavit for Warrant of Arrest for Arron M. Lewis, Facts
Constituting Probable Cause :



This was Sunday Sept 28, 2014 prior to them finding Beverly in the shallow grave bound with duct tapec early morning of Tues Sept 30, 2014.

JMHO maybe the stuff they found in AL car along with the Textme fake number, fake names was enough to obtain Kidnapping charge? Just thinking out loud.

So the Defense is doing what they do and challenging stuff what I thinking.

ETA: as far as Search warrants... appears to me there were many and in the Motions they tell which ones they are bring up with issues. I been looking up the cases referenced, learn something new all time. Hopefully useless information ;)
Sorry to quote my own post. BUT, after re reading, that whole Affidavit would have been what was used for the Kidnapping charge, as it states, Beverly Carter whereabouts were unknown. Kidnapping warrant was issued on Sunday Sept 28 at 430 pm
 
  • #849
Arron Lewis has filed a new Federal Suit. This one lists many Claims:

Deliberate Indifference to Medical needs .. one of the Defendents is Pros John F Johnson
Excessive Force, Retaliation, Excessive Force, Deliberate Indifference- Excessive Force and Illegal Search and Seizure (which doesn't IMHO have anything to do with these other claims, looks like maybe it wasn't added to other suit? But it does have rest of the accident documentation with more little tidbits) JMHO

In this new suit, he references the incident that the Pros referenced in the June 1 hearing, in which Pros said day started out bad that AL was pepper sprayed. Also makes reference to incidents allegedly occurred Oct 5 and that his new attorney took photos.


Also in the Affidavit, it appears that AL did have a retainer with attorney Milas Hale. Shows a $600 retainer was returned and it does show that it had been applied to AL prisoner account within the last 6 months. Wonder where he got $600? Thinking out loud... maybe he had Milas Hale on retainer for case that he spoke about in the Mental Exam trying to get visitation with his child? It was mentioned in his Complaint against the PCSO suit filed back in Nov 2014 one of the questions he asked Inv Drew Evans referenced Milas Hale.

View attachment al v pros john johnson filed oct 13 2015 affidavit.pdf View attachment al v pros john johnson filed oct 13 2015 complaint.pdf JMHO
 
  • #850
Some of these documents are confusing to me. This is the one that I said JMO wasn't to do with the incidents in particular but probably should have been in the first suit....

On page 15/19 of the complaint filed Oct 13, 2015.
Supplemental Report dated Sept 28, 2014... scays
Ryno Wrecker responded to the scene and took possession of the vehicle.

Sgt Blain arrived and on scene and I (M Swagerty) gave him the cell phone (that he took from AL). The vehicle was seized and followed to the main department by Sgt Blain as Ryno Towing and Recovery transported it to our crime scene bay.

BUT on page 17/19 Motor Veh Collision Report (2/4) it shows
Ryno Towing and Recovery XXXX South 2nd St Cabot AR "is the location that the vehicle was removed to"

Also more times to put into the timeline

Accident occurred 9:55 am (Sgt Almond Clay, time notified)
EMS notified at 10:05 am
EMS arrived at 10:10 am
Sgt Almond Clay arrived at 10:10 am (PCSO who worked the accident on 9/28/2014)
JMHO
 
  • #851
Pros has filed Responses to Motions not addressed by the Judge. * haven't looked at them yet, but maybe we will get a little more insight...

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO DISMISS THE CHARGE OF CAPITAL MURDER:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO EXCLUDE TEXT MESSAGES AND EMAILS:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FROM SEARCH OF FUJI CAMERA:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO RETURN PROPERTY:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OBTAINED THROUGH PROSECUTOR['S SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FROM SEARCH OF 2012 BLACK FORD FUSION:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FROM SEARCH OF 165 RANDALL DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE ARKANSAS:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE FROM SEARCH OF IBM LAPTOP COMPUTER:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TAKEN FROM THE SILVER IPHONE:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO EXCLUDE BASED ON MARITAL PRIVILEGE:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT OF THE DEF AND EVIDENCE SEIZED FROM VEHICLE ACCIDENT:ST
Images WEB

10/16/2015
08:54 AM RESPONSE TO MOTION FILED JOHNSON, JOHN F
Entry: TO SUPPRESS DEF'S STATEMENT:ST
Images WEB
https://caseinfo.aoc.arkansas.gov/c...=P&case_id=60CR-14-3928&begin_date=&end_date=
 
  • #852
:laughing: AL sends CL stuff ... and she pleads GUILTY ...

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS
FOURTH DIVISION
STATE OF ARKANSAS PLAINTIFF
VS. CR14-3928
AARON LEWIS DEFENDANT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO EXCLUDE BASED ON MARITAL PRIVILEGE
Comes now the State of Arkansas, by and through John F. Johnson, Deputy Prosecuting
Attorney, and for its response to the defendant’s motion states the following:
1. The defendant is charged with capital murder.
2. Following his arrest, the defendant was advised of his rights on multiple occasions and
made multiple statements to the members of the Pulaski County Sherriff’s Office and the
FBI regarding the events surrounding the death of Ms. Beverly Carter.
3. Following his arrest, the defendant made several statements to the media regarding the
murder of Ms. Carter and how he came to target her.
4. Following his return to the Arkansas Department of Corrections, the defendant contacted
the media and gave an on camera interview regarding the death of Ms. Carter.
5. On September 25, 2015, the defendant met with Dr. Melissa Dannacher of the Arkansas
State Hospital for the purpose of a second mental evaluation. In his first mental
evaluation the defendant declined to discuss the homicide. For his second evaluation, the
defendant brought with him a handwritten, highly detailed narrative regarding the death
of Ms. Carter. In this narrative the defendant attempts to explain the evidence contained
in the investigative file that he had been supplied via discovery.
6. While the defendant was incarcerated, but prior to Crystal Lowery entering a negotiated
plea of guilty, the defendant wrote several letters to Lowery regarding the murder of Ms.
Carter, suggesting things that Lowery should say in her defense.
7. One of the letters included affidavits written and signed by the defendant, Lewis. The
affidavits are statements by this defendant pertaining to certain evidence against the
defendant and Lowery wherein the defendant is making certain assertions about that
evidence. In the letter the defendant instructs Lowery to present the affidavits to a third
 
  • #853
party (presumably some branch of law enforcement or a jury). As evidence of her
innocence.

8. A communication is confidential if it is made privately by any person to his or her spouse
and is not intended for disclosure to any other person. Ark. R. Evid. 504(a). An accused
in a criminal proceeding has a privilege to prevent his spouse from testifying as to any
confidential communication between the accused and the spouse. Ark. R. Evid. 504(b).
9. A person upon whom these rules confer a privilege against disclosure waives the
privilege if he …discloses or consents to the disclosure of any significant part of the
privileged matter. This rule does not apply if the disclosure itself is privileged. Ark R.
Evid 510.
10. In the instant case, the defendant’s statement to the Pulaski County Sherriff’s Office and
the FBI, alone, are enough to waive the marital privilege sought by the defendant. This
precise issue was ruled on by the Arkansas Supreme Court in Mackool v. State, 365 Ark.
3d 416, 231 S.W.3d 676 (Ark. 2006).
11. In Mackool, the court pointed out that the combined effect of MacKool’s “initial
statement to the police late on September 13, 2003, as a person of interest, in which he
denied any knowledge of the murder and claimed to have a cordial relationship with the
victim; (2) Mike's statement that Leslie got the coin collection from her mother a week
before her mother's death; (3) Mike's questions to Bracey concerning whether the police
wanted to hear the truth and whether it was good to be up front; (4) Mike's telling Bracey
"probably, no," and "ain't got no reason to," when Bracey asked him if he would have
asked whether he should tell the truth if he was not guilty; and (5) Mike's statement that
Leslie "can cry and trying to say I made her do it, you know and that's just a bunch of
bull,” resulted in a waiver of marital privilege because he had disclosed a significant part
of the privileged matter. Id.
12. The court in Mackool goes on to point out that it is of no consequence that Mackool
made is statements to the police rather than other third parties. Id at 420.
13. In the letters the defendant sent to Lowery, he instructed her what to say to a third party
regarding evidence. He also provided Lowery with affidavits regarding that evidence and
instructed her to show them to a third party. By doing so, this defendant waived spousal
privilege on the topic of the death of Ms. Carter. David v. State, 286 Ark. 205, 691 S.W.
2d 133 (Ark. 1985) In David, the defendant instructed his wife what to say to the police
regarding the homicide he had committed and the court found that these were statements
intended to be communicated to a third party and were, therefore, not privileged under
A.R.E. 504.
 
  • #854
:thinking:
Wait.... letter to CL... I wonder if that was the letter to the 1st Attorney that the guard at Tucker opened (check for contraband) but read and kept (per AL, Guard, affidavit from inmate next cell, and AL attorney). Remember they didnt allow AL to write CL. He filed the lawsuit, then they allowed .. and he was then moved to Varner SuperMax.... and then could no longer write, due to diff prison. Then the Fed suit dismissed as he no longer in Tucker... I cant remember if he has appealed that or not.

We had this conversation before. This should be interesting (jmho) I guess gonna depend when the letter was written. AL would know that his letters to CL would be read (career criminal that he is) very small time frame that he could have written to CL, but we do not know if he did, that PCRDF (Pulaski County Jail) where CL was held, we do not know if they would allow her to receive his mail, just because he was allowed for a small timeframe (from Tucker to Varner timeframe). VERY Possible CL never saw the Letters and only knew of from her Public Defender. JMHO... thinking out loud
 
  • #855
Wondering again if the Media will do an FOIA for the 2nd Mental Eval? thats how we were able to read the first one. This is the same Dr who saw AL the first time.
 
  • #856
Wondering again if the Media will do an FOIA for the 2nd Mental Eval? thats how we were able to read the first one. This is the same Dr who saw AL the first time.
I've been looking, but so far...nothing.
 
  • #857
Luckily, his big mouth carries a big shovel to dig himself a big hole. I'm not sure how you can plead not guilty when you show up to an evaluation with a handwritten account of the murder. Every time I read, I am more disgusted by them and more sorry for Beverly's family. I am thinking they did keep her alive for some time. They made her record a ransom message to her family. Carl said to let her go and he would pay the reward, or whatever. I cannot imagine how scared she was. And where did they keep her? At their house? I never believed the ex-boyfriend story, but was he not home and let Crusty use his house? I can't imagine. A hotel? Not likely! I can't see her staying out in the woods with Beverly and they would definitely not leave her alone! Where did they have her? My guess is their house. But, they were being watched after a couple of days, so they would have had to get rid of her before that. And her shoes indicated she walked to her death spot at the cement company (I'm so sorry, Beverly). Crystal was selling the furniture after he was in jail, so if they had her tied to something, that would have already been gone, leaving little evidence. Didn't someone say she sold her daughter's bedroom set? Well, that would make sense. Ugh. It is all just so horrible. So many really bad details to come. He's never getting out of jail, so I wish he would just plead guilty and let her family be done with it. That is unlikely since he LOVES his infamy. He actually feels accomplished in making the news for killing an innocent woman while working. Real winner.
 
  • #858
Luckily, his big mouth carries a big shovel to dig himself a big hole. I'm not sure how you can plead not guilty when you show up to an evaluation with a handwritten account of the murder. Every time I read, I am more disgusted by them and more sorry for Beverly's family. I am thinking they did keep her alive for some time. They made her record a ransom message to her family. Carl said to let her go and he would pay the reward, or whatever. I cannot imagine how scared she was. And where did they keep her? At their house? I never believed the ex-boyfriend story, but was he not home and let Crusty use his house? I can't imagine. A hotel? Not likely! I can't see her staying out in the woods with Beverly and they would definitely not leave her alone! Where did they have her? My guess is their house. But, they were being watched after a couple of days, so they would have had to get rid of her before that. And her shoes indicated she walked to her death spot at the cement company (I'm so sorry, Beverly). Crystal was selling the furniture after he was in jail, so if they had her tied to something, that would have already been gone, leaving little evidence. Didn't someone say she sold her daughter's bedroom set? Well, that would make sense. Ugh. It is all just so horrible. So many really bad details to come. He's never getting out of jail, so I wish he would just plead guilty and let her family be done with it. That is unlikely since he LOVES his infamy. He actually feels accomplished in making the news for killing an innocent woman while working. Real winner.
Personally I dont think Beverly was ever at the house 165 Randall. Too many ways to get caught (neighbors, Daughter coming home for something)

IIRC that bed that CL posted online was the same headboard that was on the bed AL was on in a pic without a shirt on. He also has a watch on in at least 3 pictures (on his Ok Cupid profile, which is still up) They took his watch. Wonder if they found anything in it. I know they take knives apart to get evidence inside after the knife is washed) Surely if he had it on during meeting and all that happened afterward there would be some kind of at least trace on it. He appears too vain to not wear it.
 
  • #859
:thinking:
Wait.... letter to CL... I wonder if that was the letter to the 1st Attorney that the guard at Tucker opened (check for contraband) but read and kept (per AL, Guard, affidavit from inmate next cell, and AL attorney). Remember they didnt allow AL to write CL. He filed the lawsuit, then they allowed .. and he was then moved to Varner SuperMax.... and then could no longer write, due to diff prison. Then the Fed suit dismissed as he no longer in Tucker... I cant remember if he has appealed that or not.

We had this conversation before. This should be interesting (jmho) I guess gonna depend when the letter was written. AL would know that his letters to CL would be read (career criminal that he is) very small time frame that he could have written to CL, but we do not know if he did, that PCRDF (Pulaski County Jail) where CL was held, we do not know if they would allow her to receive his mail, just because he was allowed for a small timeframe (from Tucker to Varner time frame). VERY Possible CL never saw the Letters and only knew of from her Public Defender. JMHO... thinking out loud

OK, I went back and was re reading and on Federal suit that AL filed against Tucker Max, on Dec 17, 2014 Captain Robinson confiscated his Legal Mail that had 2 affidavits to his wife and that his attorney told him he could send them to him and attorney would give them to CL attorney. ** the part call retaliation is because (from what I get reading the complaint) AL says his Constitutional Rights were violated because the Deputy Warden would not allow him to write to CL his wife (Nov 2014). And the letter to his attorney being confiscated is because of that. AL says that only the name "Crystal" is on a page, not wife. The Judge in the Federal Suit allowed for the suit to go forth.. Same Deputy Warden who said no, changed mind 2 days after served, AL was moved to Varner, then it became Moot....

ETA AL has appealed that case.
Orig it was filed late Dec 2014, motions back and forth, AL vol dismissed Feb 2015, about 2 weeks later 2/24/2015 AL reopened.
3/23/2015 Summons issued
3/25/2015 Deputy Warden Outlaw as served
3/27/2015 Per AL, Deputy Warden Outlaw "approved" his request to correspond with CL.
4/6/2015 Order filed Partial
7/6/2015 Order in part allowing the First Amendment claim to proceed
7/7/2015 AL filed an Objection to Recommendations (suit could go thru with case against Deputy Warden Outlaw against First Amendment Claim) but part on the mail (retaliation suit) dismissed without prejudice and time to object was given to respond. Which AL objection shows filed . There is also a copy from Lawyer Hensley as an exhibit about the subject of the confiscated legal letter to him from AL.
7/22/2015 *** AL is transferred to Varner**
7/28/2015 Filed was change of address from AL stating he was moved from Tucker to Varner on 7/22/2015.
8/2/2015 :
8. Plaintiff’s transfer from the Tucker Unit to the Varner Unit moots his claims and
entitles Defendant Outlaw to a judgment of dismissal of the claims against him.
9. Moreover, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Outlaw are moot as he was
granted the relief requested in his Complaint prior to his transfer to Varner.
WHEREFORE, Defendant Steve Outlaw respectfully requests his Motion for Summary
Judgment be granted and that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed in its entirety.
Respectfully submitted,
Leslie Rutledge
Attorney General
By: /s/ Amber R. Schubert
Arkansas Bar No. 09150

08/25/2015 39 MOTION to Strike and MOTION for Sanctions by Arron Michael Lewis. (kdr) (Entered: 08/25/2015)
08/25/2015 40 REPLY to Response to Motion re 37 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and/or MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Arron Michael Lewis. (kdr) (Entered: 08/25/2015)
08/25/2015 41 RESPONSE in Opposition re 39 MOTION to Strike MOTION for Sanctions filed by Steve Outlaw. (Schubert, Amber) (Entered: 08/25/2015)
09/03/2015 42 ORDER denying 33 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/. (ks) (Entered: 09/03/2015)
09/03/2015 43 ORDER denying 39 Motion to Strike and Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/3/2015. (csf) (Entered: 09/03/2015)
09/11/2015 44 RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that the 26 motion for summary judgment be granted, plaintiff's first amendment claim against Defendant Outlaw be dismissed with prejudice, and plaintiff's 37 motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied as moot. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/11/2015. (ks) (Entered: 09/11/2015)
09/22/2015 45 OBJECTION to 44 Recommended Disposition by Arron Michael Lewis. (ljb) (Entered: 09/22/2015)
09/23/2015 46 ORDER ADOPTING 44 Recommended Disposition. Defendant Outlaw's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Mr. Lewis's first amendment claim against Defendant Outlaw is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Mr. Lewis's 37 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED, as moot. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/23/2015. (mcz) (Entered: 09/23/2015)
09/23/2015 47 JUDGMENT Consistent with the 46 Order entered this day, this case is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/23/2015. (mcz) (Entered: 09/23/2015)
10/02/2015 48 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, by Arron Michael Lewis. (mcz) (Entered: 10/02/2015)
10/02/2015 49 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 46 Order and 47 Judgment, filed by Arron Michael Lewis. (mcz) (Entered: 10/02/2015)
10/06/2015 50 ORDER granting 48 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/6/2015. (fcd) (Entered: 10/06/2015)
10/06/2015 51 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA SUPPLEMENT as to Arron Michael Lewis re 49 Notice of Appeal, 46 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, 47 Judgment. (fcd) (Entered: 10/06/2015)
 
  • #860
:thinking: Will be interesting to see how the Pros came to have the Affidavits referenced in the Pros Response to Motion.. (if they are same that were in the confiscated legal mail to Lawyer Hensley...and if so how that will play out) Just my opinion and honest curiosity
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
118
Guests online
3,289
Total visitors
3,407

Forum statistics

Threads
632,624
Messages
18,629,222
Members
243,222
Latest member
Wiggins
Back
Top