ZooSleuth
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2013
- Messages
- 1,420
- Reaction score
- 27
Just curious why some defend CL but yet don't defend AL? They are both charged with the same crimes.It seems like a double standard to say she is innocent until proven guilty but not apply that same standard to AL. Is it because its harder to believe a woman could be a part of such hideous crimes? jmo
I have not seen anybody here use the "innocent until proven guilty" line when talking about CL. The bottomline is that AL admitted to being involved, that's enough for me to say he's guilty. We have not seen a shred of evidence against CL that implicates her in murder or kidnapping.
I'm the type of person that doesn't allow others (LE) to make up my mind for me. I just want to hear the evidence first before I can agree with them charging her with what they did. I don't need a jury's verdict, which I'm assuming is what you meant by "innocent until proven guilty."
I will admit, however, the odds are good that LE charged her with murder/kidnapping based on legit evidence, especially since the charges weren't downgraded last week.