(((Hypothesis Alert)))
I mean, they are no longer in it together because GG panicked and swam back to shore.
When I consider that fact that GG is most likely "underwater" on his home and behind on child support it makes the most sense that he would disappear himself. Problems solved. Mom gets a nice check. Perhaps she's even in on it and will send him some funds when able. She's avoided the media so far, correct?
RG just wants to get away too. Her support payments are drying up, she's lost her job. She inks GG's name as almost as a joke. Mom (who is her benficiary on her "real" life ins. policy) will get the major payout.
Only....When D-day comes Robyn is a strong swimmer (we have reports of this? yes? despite her hair extensions?) and GG...not so much.
It is much easier to tell a half truth than a full lie. GG did indeed panic and swim to shore w/o his companion. He really did look back and she was gone. Only, he might have an idea of what happened to her. He may also indeed be telling the truth that he didn't kill her. Without a body we will never know.
Soooo, that's wayyyyy out there, but until LE giives us something more to work with?
Poke some holes! :crazy:
I like this theory -- a little like Double Indemnity except they murder themselves...:innocent:
1. I agree about the half-lie. I think GG may well have looked back and seen that she was really gone.
2. I think the plan works just as well, even better maybe, if only one of them is in on it. So here's my modification:
GG's Masterplan
MOTIVE: escape swamp of debt and aggro, emerge at other end as sympathetic millionaire
1. Find and insure likely (and vulnerable) target
2. Take said target to pleasure island, ply with alcohol/prescription drugs
3. Swim in adventurous waters with target
4. Visbly come to aid of target as she begins to go under (whoops!) and perhaps nearly drown (or appear really drown) oneself
5. Grieve, wait out the insurance investigators, collect
I think the problem remains that there is no guarantee of collecting and that the incident is certain to be investigated. The same scenario on a cruise ship seems like a far surer thing. I wonder also if an established pattern of going on a trip and insuring, going on another trip and insuring, might have been more convincing if more expensive.
Given GG's history of wayward scams involving himself as an aggrieved party pursuing lost-cause cases (Costco, the HR firm) I think some version of the
Plaidmom Scenario above makes more sense than a violent confrontation in which RG is sadistically assaulted and then murdered.
Although, for whatever reason, these two sorts of crimes, sexual violence and oddball scams, seem to form the two axes of GG's criminality. At any one time either could dominate or the two might even coincide, I suppose.
What other evidence do you think might turn up?
best,
s