lol,good one,I'm kidding him btw.Ames said:I am going to start calling him SUPERIORDave....because he is so knowledgeable about this case....AND I AGREE with everything he says.
lol,good one,I'm kidding him btw.Ames said:I am going to start calling him SUPERIORDave....because he is so knowledgeable about this case....AND I AGREE with everything he says.
JMO8778 said:lol,good one,I'm kidding him btw.![]()
LOL !coloradokares said:Yes that would be super.....But that would make him SUPERCALIFRAGILISTICEXPIALIDOCIOUS Dave!!!![]()
yea,neat !Ames said:LOL...yeah I know. But wouldn't it be something, if he really WAS Steve Thomas? :crazy:
SuperDave is 25 years old, too young to be Steve.JMO8778 said:Well,if you were Steve Thomas,would you tell us?![]()
I'm sure,and he is a big help,for sure ! I stopped reading J's site awhile back,I just couldn't stand all the obvious lies from the IDI's ..ughh !rashomon said:SuperDave is 26 years old, too young to be Steve.
SD was once a firm believer in the Ramseys' innocence, but his growing doubts led him to an in-depth study (and imo to the truth) of the case, and here on WS we all profit from his in-depth study and extensive knowledge.
He knows both sides of the fence, he knows the arguments and tactics of the Ramsey advocates, for he has been to their site (an I suppose got a bucked to Jameson dirt emptied over him when he started asking questions which they didn't want to hear over there.
We are most fortunate to have him .......My doubts grew over time. And my interest came from the moment the news broke. When she was kidnapped and they had not found her yet. I am sure familiar with getting the bucket of dirt emptied on me for what I believe.rashomon said:SuperDave is 26 years old, too young to be Steve.
SD was once a firm believer in the Ramseys' innocence, but his growing doubts led him to an in-depth study (and imo to the truth) of the case, and here on WS we all profit from his in-depth study and extensive knowledge.
He knows both sides of the fence, he knows the arguments and tactics of the Ramsey advocates, for he has been to their site (an I suppose got a bucked to Jameson dirt emptied over him when he started asking questions which they didn't want to hear over there.
I remember when all the KarrCrap was going on. My boss asked me what I thought. Well, imagine his surprise when I said, "I think her mom killed her" "What?!?!?!?!? No way..no way would a mom do that to her daughter!! What about the ransom note?" he says.coloradokares said:We are most fortunate to have him .......My doubts grew over time. And my interest came from the moment the news broke. When she was kidnapped and they had not found her yet. I am sure familiar with getting the bucket of dirt emptied on me for what I believe.
rashomon said:SuperDave is 25 years old, too young to be Steve.
QUOTE]
Yeah...he SAYS he is 25-26...but do we really believe him???j/k
Been there a thousand times... So much so that I feel some would really like to abandon their buckets and pick up a shovel....:doh:santos1014 said:I remember when all the KarrCrap was going on. My boss asked me what I thought. Well, imagine his surprise when I said, "I think her mom killed her" "What?!?!?!?!? No way..no way would a mom do that to her daughter!! What about the ransom note?" he says.
"Have you ever read the ransom note?" I ask...and rush to my computer to print out a copy. He reads it and says..."Well that seals it for me..NO way did her mom write this bunch of nonsense!!" "WHY would she?"
at that point, knowing what I was up against, I smiled and went to my office.
I had just washed my hair and didnt need any dirt coming down on me LOL
santos1014 said:Santos, judging from the 'circumstantial evidence'rashomon said:SuperDave is 25 years old, too young to be Steve.
QUOTE]
Yeah...he SAYS he is 25-26...but do we really believe him???j/k
found on the 'Crime & Justice' JBR forum (scroll down to post #37 on the thread), I believe him 100 per cent: http://www.crimeandjustice.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=9026&hl=Dave&st=20
ROTFLMBO......... circumstancial evidence. LOL:crazy:rashomon said:Santos, judging from the 'circumstantial evidence'found on the 'Crime & Justice' JBR forum (scroll down to post #37 on the thread), I believe him 100 per cent: ht[url="http://www.crimeandjustice.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=9026&hl=Dave&st=20"]tp://www.crimeandjustice.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=9026&hl=Dave&st=20[/url]
my word...I think you two need to trade places...YOU should be the boss, since he's not too awful intelligent !!!santos1014 said:I remember when all the KarrCrap was going on. My boss asked me what I thought. Well, imagine his surprise when I said, "I think her mom killed her" "What?!?!?!?!? No way..no way would a mom do that to her daughter!! What about the ransom note?" he says.
"Have you ever read the ransom note?" I ask...and rush to my computer to print out a copy. He reads it and says..."Well that seals it for me..NO way did her mom write this bunch of nonsense!!" "WHY would she?"
at that point, knowing what I was up against, I smiled and went to my office.
I had just washed my hair and didnt need any dirt coming down on me LOL
an I suppose got a bucket of Jameson dirt emptied over him when he started asking questions which they didn't want to hear over there
Nine-ish seems to be the approximation of when they got home and there-in lies the mystery of the pineapple! Lou Smit describes the pineapple as the "bugaboo".
You see there was fresh pineapple lying out in a dish on the Ramsey kitchen counter and JonBenet was known to be very partial to pineapple. Pineapple wasn't served at the Whites' house.
Experts give us a 2-5 hour window during which the pineapple would have digested to the stage where it was in her system.
Now (the bugaboo bit) - the Ramseys left for the Whites' at 4-ish so if JonBenet had eaten the pineapple BEFORE she left for the Whites, then it means she died very shortly after arriving home - i.e. at the 5 hour edge of the 2-5 hour digestion period. However, John Ramsey and Burke didn't go to bed until some time after 10 because according to John, they made a model together before going to bed.
Alternatively, JonBenet could have died between midnight and 3am but that means she ate the pineapple when she got home and both Ramseys claim that she was asleep when they arrived home and didn't waken up even when she was undressed and put to bed. It should be noted however, that Burke allegedly claimed his sister was awake when they got home from the Whites and that she walked upstairs by hrself.
As Lou says - the big bugaboo!
The big bugaboo is right! It is the single most incriminating piece of evidence pointing to the Rs as the killers in this case, IMHO.
Why? Because it is absolutly THERE, without refute. In her stomach. AND on the R table. The SAME pineapple (it was analyzed). Not just in a photo. Frozen in police evidence.
If the Rs were innocent, they would have no reason to lie about something as innocuous as giving their daughter a bedtime pineapple snack when they arrived home.
It's a fact that in order to stress their innocence, they have to be convincing when they say that she was carried in asleep (a version their own son disputes) and they never saw her alive again. The pineapple proves otherwise. PR's (and ONLY PR's) prints are on the bowl. No "mystery male caucasion DNA there.