Attorney Brad Conway To Release More Evidence In Anthony Case On 09/30/09

Status
Not open for further replies.
...and if the State didn't release it...how can BC? If anything was released it was released to JB...so what do we have going here "Puppet Theater"? If the State held something back...then JB didn't get it either, right?

That thought also just occurred to me, and I am hoping maybe one of our legal friends can explain??

If BC/CA/DC have conducted their own little investigation into Grund or Kronk, or anyone else for that matter, can they just "release" their allegations to the public through the media? Isn't that opening them up to a possible future civil case (slander maybe?) if their allegations prove to be unfounded (or even if they aren't?)???

To my knowledge, CA/GA are not a party to this criminal or civil case against KC, nor is BC an attorney of record for either party of the case (KC or the State?)
 
In my dreams BC reveals damning evidence against casey and quits the A's...


One can dream :)
 
I said it before and I'll say it again...whatever it is, is going to save Cindy's face. The stuff that came out today, still looking for caylee, all those wacky emails. Annie's description of Cindy while she stayed the night...
 
Um..."DeeC: is the investigator. "BeaC" is the attorney, but I know that you know that since you have been so on top of this case (and I appreciate your knowledge and memory!!) :blowkiss:

Just didn't want someone else to get confused :waitasec:

Thank you! I meant BC, the attorney...:blushing: not DC the investigator. Thanks for pointing out my error.

I was able to edit it and make the correction. Thanks a bunch! :woohoo:
 
Or...it could be the something about the Anthony's professional relationship with Dominic Casey. Anyone...Anyone...

There was a loooot of stuff about Dominic Casey.
 
Noooo...we needed time to digest the 1000 pages FIRST :D

That was my point. If he had released it today, we would have been 'distracted'. Either by these docs, or what he is saying.... LOL!

We will have these docs eat up by tomarrow. And be all 'ready' for what he has got. :croc:
 
I work in the legal field and no BC shouldnt be releasing any information that could slander someone or else he is opening himself up for a lawsuit. It is NOT his responsibility to release any information that pertains to the criminal case against Casey. My guess is JB is in the middle of it and cant do it himself so he is using BC to do the dirty work for him. BC be careful, you are an attorney and know better.
 
Or...it could be the something about the Anthony's professional relationship with Dominic Casey. Anyone...Anyone...

There was a loooot of stuff about Dominic Casey.

quoting myself here. there was a lot of DC and CA, LA, and GA correspondance. Isn't there still an ongoing battle about DC and his boundaries? Someone set me straight.
 
Well, I think BC should be very careful. He's representing a couple that LE has been very patient with. I think they're gonna get tired of these theatrics pretty dang soon. Nothing like shutting someone up with an arrest warrant. Oh, and if he thinks that will seem like sour grapes..John Q. Public would probably care less. JMO

ETA: He also better be talking about his clients...the rest isn't his job.

ITA. He won't be at liberty to position his wheelchair within hand holding distance from his clients when they testify in the murder trial either.:dance:

I fully expect whatever he releases tomorrow to be something that requires the public to be as clueless as his clients. Maggots on a pizza. The script ZFG gave KC. A picture of some little girl in Puerto Rico reading a book beside a woman someones aunt's brothers son called into the foundation as a tip.
Maybe they'll show us a little vial of clear fluid and try to pawn it off as genuine Anthony tears.
Paul B and Karla H's parents were so classy compared to these folks. How scary is that!!
 
That thought also just occurred to me, and I am hoping maybe one of our legal friends can explain??

If BC/CA/DC have conducted their own little investigation into Grund or Kronk, or anyone else for that matter, can they just "release" their allegations to the public through the media? Isn't that opening them up to a possible future civil case (slander maybe?) if their allegations prove to be unfounded (or even if they aren't?)???

To my knowledge, CA/GA are not a party to this criminal or civil case against KC, nor is BC an attorney of record for either party of the case (KC or the State?)
So...IMHO...whatever he has to reveal is solely for entertainment value- the media will lap it up and be cranking out story after story. Not newsworthy mind you...but there will always be someone to buy it.
 
I said it before and I'll say it again...whatever it is, is going to save Cindy's face. The stuff that came out today, still looking for caylee, all those wacky emails. Annie's description of Cindy while she stayed the night...
IOW...Extreme Makeover?
 
quoting myself here. there was a lot of DC and CA, LA, and GA correspondance. Isn't there still an ongoing battle about DC and his boundaries? Someone set me straight.

No you are correct about DC and who he worked for and when. The emails tell a very different story than the one that he just recently testified to in front of the judge while being questioned by ZG's attorney.

I think someone is going to be in a lot of trouble when all is said and done.
 
Me thinks that he received a phone call from CA this afternoon that contained many four letter words DEMANDING that as her attorney, he DO SOMETHING immediately to counter the release of these emails she engaged in that she did NOT think would ever become public!

I imagine she is pretty enraged right about now, especially if she has been reading this forum to gauge the reaction to this doc dump!!

From reading these e-mails, I would guess that it wouldn't be her first visit.

Which means it wouldn't be the first time she seen folks laughing at her family. Pointing out how silly the look and act. And how they assume they are so special.

It's not the first time we have heard of her arrogance in assuming she could shut this web site down.. And that was so last year. LOL! We are still here, and CA is still :banghead:
 
No you are correct about DC and who he worked for and when. The emails tell a very different story than the one that he just recently testified to in front of the judge while being questioned by ZG's attorney.

I think someone is going to be in a lot of trouble when all is said and done.

Yep, I see new evidence in the ZFG case.
 
From reading these e-mails, I would guess that it wouldn't be her first visit.

Which means it wouldn't be the first time she seen folks laughing at her family. Pointing out how silly the look and act. And how they assume they are so special.

It's not the first time we have heard of her arrogance in assuming she could shut this web site down.. And that was so last year. LOL! We are still here, and CA is still :banghead:
Slightly OT...but me thinks she's a night owl.
 
ITA. He won't be at liberty to position his wheelchair within hand holding distance from his clients when they testify in the murder trial either.:dance:

I fully expect whatever he releases tomorrow to be something that requires the public to be as clueless as his clients. Maggots on a pizza. The script ZFG gave KC. A picture of some little girl in Puerto Rico reading a book beside a woman someones aunt's brothers son called into the foundation as a tip.
Maybe they'll show us a little vial of clear fluid and try to pawn it off as genuine Anthony tears.
Paul B and Karla H's parents were so classy compared to these folks. How scary is that!!

Bolded by me......Maybe that's it! They finally got the revised, revised, final revision of the ZG script done and now they are ready to hand it over to prove that Casey really did have a script. Creative writing at it's finest!
 
Yep, I see new evidence in the ZFG case.
Ya know what I don't get...truly...how it is ok to lie in Court. Everyone does it. I've been to Court recently and have seen it with my very own eyes. It's like it's a "given"...but I still don't get it!!
 
From reading these e-mails, I would guess that it wouldn't be her first visit.

Which means it wouldn't be the first time she seen folks laughing at her family. Pointing out how silly the look and act. And how they assume they are so special.

It's not the first time we have heard of her arrogance in assuming she could shut this web site down.. And that was so last year. LOL! We are still here, and CA is still :banghead:

Yep, we're still here and she's not chewing her gum like Bessie with her cud anymore. . . Although she would never admit it, as much as she hates us "bloggers" . . . she has responded to many of our observations!!
 
Apologies if this has been mentioned before as I am still reading this thread, but could what BC is planning to release include GA's GJ testimony? As the attorney of record for the A's, wouldn't he be entitled to this info maybe even before anyone else? TIA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
184
Guests online
853
Total visitors
1,037

Forum statistics

Threads
625,962
Messages
18,517,105
Members
240,915
Latest member
CalvinJ
Back
Top