Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

  • #2,061
My read is that they are being described *by the media* as private, as essentially an excuse, shorthand for "did not want to give us a statement".

Which, honestly why should they - they don't owe it to the media jackals and they don't owe it to us, the rubbernecking public.

They dont, but people shouldn't be surprised people care when 4 yo's disappear off the face of the earth. It's such a common fear for parents and pretty much everyone's worst nightmare. It would be weird if the media didn't focus energy on it given the odd and now devastating circumstances.

It wasnt just the media who described them this way. Just for accuracy. Not that it really matters. I just thought it was interesting.
 
  • #2,062
Perhaps the family are in hiding for a variety of reasons, there's a custody battle of sorts, he's in some form of family foster care etc. You'd think they'd want to whole of Australia to know their boys face, but I guess they have their reasons not to. 🤷‍♀️
Weird but true
 
  • #2,063
  • #2,064
They're not private by any definition i know of as I previously outlined. Lots of people dont have social media. Especially over a certain age.

They're free to behave how they like or how they've been advised to behave - that's their prerogative - but for no one in the family to give any kind of public statement/appeal its not really like any other case i can think of. Not off the top of my head anyway.

I find it interesting to compare the investigation/media reports of this case to that of AJ Elfalak. I'm guessing NSW investigations couldn't be much different to SA ones so here's video of how the police conducted that investigation. Police/media reporting was far more transparent. Whats changed in 4 years that this time its so closed off to the public?
That family and Gus' are totally different personalities. That family had their own money so they could go up in a helicopter. Sheep farmers during a drought won't have that kind of money. It's also about respecting the families wishes. Media reporting depends on police allowing access. Gus family want privacy and the police have respected that. MOO
 
  • #2,065
I think there is a difference between recluse like and private.
 
  • #2,066
I think there is a difference between recluse like and private.
And not everyone is comfortable with speaking in public. No matter what the cause.
 
  • #2,067
  • #2,068
And not everyone is comfortable with speaking in public. No matter what the cause.
I agree.

And having their every word/s scrutinised for years by the public who often are trying to find fault / something nefarious in their words & mannerisms etc

If they did do an appeal they would be picked apart by the public IMO. Why did they say that? Why didn't they say this? Why did they look like that? etc etc etc

I also believe that the police don't believe that there is any value in then doing an appeal

Who wants their life picked to pieces & savaged by uncaring people on social media.

I think they are being smart.

As long as the family are co-operating with the police I'm happy with that.

I'm also happy that they seem to have caring & supportive "neighbours" that speak highly of them , from what I have seen.

They are going thru hell , as well as I imagine still trying to run their sheep station in very hard times.

All IMO
 
Last edited:
  • #2,069
I agree.

And having their every word/s scrutinised for years by the public who often are trying to find fault / something nefarious in their words & mannerisms etc

If they did do an appeal they would be picked apart by the public IMO. Why did they say that? Why didn't they say this? Why did they look like that? etc etc etc

I also believe that the police don't believe that there is any value in then doing an appeal

Who wants their life picked to pieces & savaged by uncaring people on social media.

I think they are being smart.

As long as the family are co-operating with the police I'm happy with that.

I'm also happy that they seem to have caring & supportive "neighbours" that speak highly of them , from what I have seen.

They are going thru hell , as well as I imagine still trying to run their sheep station in very hard times.

Agreed.
There are too many self proclaimed 'experts' all over YT & SM, body language, so called statement analysts, amateur investigators, all getting paid for clicks on different platforms with their "bombshells" and "exclusives". Who'd want to be ripped apart by a huge number of individuals of mainly opposing and often biased opinions.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,070
I agree.

And having their every word/s scrutinised for years by the public who often are trying to find fault / something nefarious in their words & mannerisms etc

If they did do an appeal they would be picked apart by the public IMO. Why did they say that? Why didn't they say this? Why did they look like that? etc etc etc

I also believe that the police don't believe that there is any value in then doing an appeal

Who wants their life picked to pieces & savaged by uncaring people on social media.

I think they are being smart.

As long as the family are co-operating with the police I'm happy with that.

I'm also happy that they seem to have caring & supportive "neighbours" that speak highly of them , from what I have seen.

They are going thru hell , as well as I imagine still trying to run their sheep station in very hard times.

While that boy is still missing they're going to be scrutinised and picked apart regardless of whether they speak to the media or stay silent. That's just the nature of things. It's especially so in a perplexing case that makes no sense. If we're completely baffled I can only imagine his parents are too - to put it lightly. If it were me though )and there was no possibility of kidnapping or foul play) I'd want to get the precise timeline out there and the facts of what occurred. If only so other families can learn from the event. He's not the first little one to go missing on a family property and he certainly won't be the last unfortunately.
 
  • #2,071
  • #2,072
While that boy is still missing they're going to be scrutinised and picked apart regardless of whether they speak to the media or stay silent. That's just the nature of things. It's especially so in a perplexing case that makes no sense. If we're completely baffled I can only imagine his parents are too - to put it lightly. If it were me though )and there was no possibility of kidnapping or foul play) I'd want to get the precise timeline out there and the facts of what occurred. If only so other families can learn from the event. He's not the first little one to go missing on a family property and he certainly won't be the last unfortunately.


That will all come out in an inquest if Gus is not found.

I'm sure the police no the precise timeline & facts, the public don't need to know the in's & out's of everything, no matter how much they "demand" them IMO. This is quite a unique case re the location.

Leave them alone & grieve in their own way.

As I said before as long as they are co-operating with the police, than it's all good by me. I respect their decisions.

I still believe he has been missed in the searches ( so many places he could be on that property ) or they haven't searched far enough??

IMO
 
  • #2,073

Very wise words by Nicole Morris the director of the Australian Missing Persons Register ( who deals with the families of missing person's everyday )

“Even if Gus if is found, his family’s life is forever changed as there is always going to be questions over why he wasn’t found, how did he wander away or what happened – even if he is found, those questions won’t be answered,” she tells.

While users on social media continue to debate and theorise about what happened to Gus, Nicole is reminding the community that their comments can compound the grief Gus’s family is feeling.


“If there was any suggestion that this was in anyway suspicious, the police would’ve made that extremely clear, and they’ve done nothing to suggest this,” she says.


“To suggest that the parents or grandparents were involved is just so awful. Not everyone who goes missing is the victim of foul play and sometimes children just wander off.”

“Over the many years of making appeals on the internet, the advice I give is if the mother of the missing person was standing in front of you, would you make your comment to her face?” Nicole tells.


“There’s a chance they may be reading the comments, so if you wouldn’t say it to her face, don’t say it at all.”
 
  • #2,074
While that boy is still missing they're going to be scrutinised and picked apart regardless of whether they speak to the media or stay silent. That's just the nature of things. It's especially so in a perplexing case that makes no sense. If we're completely baffled I can only imagine his parents are too - to put it lightly. If it were me though )and there was no possibility of kidnapping or foul play) I'd want to get the precise timeline out there and the facts of what occurred. If only so other families can learn from the event. He's not the first little one to go missing on a family property and he certainly won't be the last unfortunately.
However it's not you in the spotlight. The police are doing the speaking for them. They don't need anymore victim blaming, simply because they don't want to speak out. We have to respect that and move on.
 
  • #2,075
<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

I have been following this, well perhaps not painstakingly but relatively throughly and from the start I wondered why the photograph was not dated as to when it had been taken. Children at that age can change markedly, or appear to even when photos are taken close in time. Instead I see this is a four year old and it looks like the photo was taken at Kindy or play centre. Only thought it was Kindy because of the amount of play dough he had in front of him but I guess it could have been at home especially if home has a home office/school room. My nieces had correspondence school lessons from kindy age and sometimes had photographers visit to do 'school' photographs. But looking at the photo it does look edited and perhaps that is why I have always felt odd about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,076
I'm struggling to understand why we're hearing from neighbours, friends, townspeople about this and not the family themselves. I can't recall anything like this..

People keep saying that they're a private family but that's obviously not the case if everyone knows, has known their whole family for generations, and people are comfortable speaking on their behalf.

When I think of a private family I think of people in my street I've never interacted with, who have never acknowledged me and have zero to do with their community. It seems this family was well known, well liked, and were involved.

Deciding not to talk to the media doesn't make people "private" as a descriptor. So i dont get why it keeps being bandied about by people the media speak to.
Why doesn’t Gus’s father speak to the media?
 
  • #2,077
<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>

Police released an image of the missing boy sitting at a table, featuring his light blond curly hair and hazel eyes, wearing a shirt with a Peppa Pig logo, stars and My Mummy written across the front.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,078
Why doesn’t Gus’s father speak to the media?

Perhaps he doesn't believe that would help find Gus, but instead it would just bring more pain into an already hurting family. jmo
 
  • #2,079
What's weird is there has been no plea from Police or the family regarding if anyone in the public have sighted him (that I'm aware of). Even if they thought it was a 1% chance he was taken away alive by someone. Particularly concerning from Police as they are either sticking 100% to the thinking he's on the property or they know what's happened and need more evidence (via surveillance etc) to prosecute and find Gus.
 
  • #2,080
What's weird is there has been no plea from Police or the family regarding if anyone in the public have sighted him (that I'm aware of). Even if they thought it was a 1% chance he was taken away alive by someone. Particularly concerning from Police as they are either sticking 100% to the thinking he's on the property or they know what's happened and need more evidence (via surveillance etc) to prosecute and find Gus.

Then they would be flooded with 'sightings' of Gus from Darwin to Hobart and Perth. They would have to follow up every single sighting. We hear of how investigations get completely bogged down in that stuff.

They must think that abduction is extremely remote, or if abduction is remotely possible they don't need the public's help with it. It is quietly being investigated.

imo
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
805
Total visitors
946

Forum statistics

Threads
635,685
Messages
18,682,159
Members
243,352
Latest member
xkfunkx
Back
Top