- Joined
- Jul 11, 2015
- Messages
- 3,506
- Reaction score
- 32,083
Or if LE was sincere. It does appear some crime occurred, but from what I know, there is no clear indication of who did what. I don't quite believe that LE found "withdrawing cooperation" suspicious at the point where the same details probably had been rehashed again and again.
The suspicious thing would have been giving an unlikely story, delaying calling LE, not finding toys, food, laundry, and general evidence of Gus at 5:00 and earlier. It would be very suspicious if there were little evidence of hours of searching, such as shed doors seeming to have been left shut for months, or clean, indoor clothes. Getting an attorney days later is not suspicious- it's not like the family called the attorney before LE.
I feel like police just used an excuse to say we have a suspect in public, just to watch what the families reaction would be. I think it's possible they claimed to identify a suspect to help themselves identify a suspect.
I wonder who called LE first regarding Gus being missing and if it seemed to be a committee project to call? Were adults also searching in the background while one called, or were they all focused on the call?
MOO
