Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

[Zedx]

Can anyone clarify if Josie was making dinner at the time? I've seen it mentioned here twice but no links.

IIRC the very first news articles said Shannon saw him at 5pm playing in the sand pit, she went for a walk and came back at 5.30pm and he was gone.

 

[ChatteringBirds]

How many kilometers would he have had to walk to reach the dam? No formal statements have been made publicly by any of the four adult relatives, right?

I do wonder what Gus' family think happened, but I guess that's not our business.

 

[Zedx]

Re-watching the ACA report from tonight.

Does anyone find it strange that a family friend is admonishing people for "conspiracy theories", saying "this child has not been taken!" The reasoning being that there are 6 gates to get to the highway.

Sorry, but what?
Nothing has been ruled out at this stage. They've done a complete search of the property or at least the scrub and he hasn't been located just having wandered off.

Is this one of those situations where police just let family and friends speak to the media to see what they'll divulge?

How would she know definitively that no one abducted him off the property (could be someone who knows the property) and if that's the case then she's implying that he remains on the property and logic dictates he hasn't wandered off.

I'm baffled.

No it is definitely not strange for a family friend to to publicly defend them, this family is in enough pain with loss of a small child and they are being vilified for their family situation and suggestive conspiracy theories are also hurtful. They believe he has wandered off, not taken. This is their opinion, which they are entitled to. they may not be able to bring themselves to believe he was taken, which would be a far worse secnario than him wandering off.
What would be strange is if their friends did not publicly support them.

 

[Curiousobserver]

This should open up to google maps and show Oak Park Station.

Google Maps

Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.

www.google.com

I mean absolutely no disrespect when I ask this but... what the devil do people do who live out there? Nothing is growing, there is little or no water, you are ten of km from the nearest rd!

 

[adot0902]

It is VERY strange to me, how Mom and Dad are still together and Dad seemed to have real issues with the property and people on it, and Mom stayed there with the kids. I absolutely could not imagine staying somewhere without my husband, especially if my husband was uncomfortable with where I was staying. Maybe I'm sheltered but I have never heard of that in my entire life, if they were divorced/broken up sure I get it, but together it's just odd.

 

[Megnut]

Brainstorming --

Air tight feed barrel...

Unquestioned vehicle...

If he wasn't where she left him when she returned, he didn't go missing at 5:30. He was gone by then. He could have left one minute after she did.

Were any vehicles in play at 5 pm... or even in the 4 o'clock hour, since times might not be exact. Children seem drawn to cars.

Is there any way he crawled into a car or trailer, including any vehicle that was then used in a search for him, that could have accidently deposited him in a new lication for where he later got more lost?

Could he have gotten into a vehicle that was driven away and parked elsewhere, that driver then switching to maybe their own personal vehicle, one that just hasn't been in use since, like specialized equipment or an outfitted trailer that is only in use at intervals?

How easy one might innocently juxtaposed two events -- recall one thing as before another when it occurred opposite. Like a delivery truck, remembered as arriving much earlier, or friend or field hand leaving before...

Continuing to pick my own brain for possible explanations with no foul play involved...

JMO

 

[jessicalouise]

No it is definitely not strange for a family friend to to publicly defend them, this family is in enough pain with loss of a small child and they are being vilified for their family situation and suggestive conspiracy theories are also hurtful. They believe he has wandered off, not taken. This is their opinion, which they are entitled to. they may not be able to bring themselves to believe he was taken, which would be a far worse secnario than him wandering off.
What would be strange is if their friends did not publicly support them.

But she didn't defend them. She stated GL hadn't been taken by anyone. And considering they've found zero evidence whatsoever he's wandered off she's actually implicating them.

So between her saying that and police scaling back their search and following other lines of inquiry it can really only point in one direction and that's back to the homestead.

 

[tedtink]

But she didn't defend them. She stated GL hadn't been taken by anyone. And considering they've found zero evidence whatsoever he's wandered off she's actually implicating them.

So between her saying that and police scaling back their search and following other lines of inquiry it can really only point in one direction and that's back to the homestead.

She's not implicating them IMO.
An absence of evidence doesn't mean he didn't wander off.

 

[Sillybilly]

ADMIN NOTE:

All members need to read and understand our rules:

from: The Rules: Etiquette & Information

VICTIM FRIENDLY

Websleuths is a victim friendly forum. Attacking or bashing a victim is not allowed. Discussing known victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civil and constructive way, and only when such behavior is known to be relevant to the case.

The "victim friendly" rule extends to family members of victims and suspects. Sleuthing family members, friends, or others who have not been officially designated by law enforcement or in mainstream media as a Person of Interest or suspect is not allowed (i.e. Sleuthing out this type of information, and publicly posting their social media, personal information, including names, addresses, and background data -- even if it is public is not allowed and such posts will be removed, along with any posts that encourage such sleuthing).

This does not mean, however, that statements made by family members and other third parties cannot come into discussion as the facts of the case are reported in the media. Members may reasonably discuss what is said in MSM by them or about them, but do not make random accusations, insinuations, suggest their involvement, trash, bash or attack them, or speculate negatively about them.