Why would police say keyboard detectives are not helping find Gus?
If police are reading comments from the public, would it not be helpful to find Gus if they read something that they had not even thought about doing themselves, or overlooked something important.
South Australian Police issued a statement saying: We are confident that we have done all we can to locate Gus within the search area.
Police statement regarding Yunta search
Gus was not found in that search area and that area should have been the limit a 4 year old can walk, then IMO wouldn't they want to take a better look if they are so sure the only scenario is for Gus to have wandered off. SAPOL say there's a chance Gus will never be found, isn't that quite obvious if nobody is looking for him.
If I'm allowed to copy and paste from anther thread, this is what well known member
@Slebby posted on another thread:
The forums here at WS abound with speculation. As an example, if you look through the Jonbenet Ramsey forum, there are years of threads on the topic of BDI (Burke Did It) which in fairness, no one knows.
Respectfully, what we do as websleuths is examine a case from all angles. At least, that’s what I try to do. That’s why I go from believing it’s foul play, then unfortunate misadventure of walking in woods, then perhaps hit by car.
We ask, what if this happened? What if that happened? We apply critical thinking to what is known or believed to be true.
If we are reduced to examining from one angle only, we’ll be regurgitating MSM and the comments will be few. We can be respectful, and avoid accusations or insults to victims and families.
It is hard to ignore red flags, for example, involvement of CPS, or admitted drug use.