I hadn’t seen this anywhere yet
Thank you so much for posting this , I've just added it to the jack and lilly thread . Just thought it was a nice reminder to oneself when one begins to consider family involvement in a child's disappearance@bombardier compiled an excellent starter list of MP cases that ended with the person's remains found in/near a location that had already been searched (some multiple times) by LE/SAR. Other WS members added a few cases to the list as well. I and others thought it would be useful to start a thread in order to track these types of cases as case study analyses could prove useful in future cases. Please feel free to add summaries of similar cases of which you are aware. MOO
Great post and thanks again, @bombardier!
#
TX - TX - Jason Landry, 21, enroute from TSU to home, car...
- YaYa_521
- Replies: 75
- Forum: General Information & Discussion
It is very difficult to find a body, much more so than you would think.
MOO is he may be hidden in or around the house in some object only a 4 yr. old would think to climb into.
IMO - Personally, I find it absolutely staggering that bodies so often turn up in previously searched areas. How does this happen? What exactly are the searchers doing for it to so often appear that human beings searching for a body in any kind of rural area, are woefully inadequate. Is there anything that can be changed to make searches more successful? Why are human bodies so difficult to find, even when not purposefully hidden? My questions are merely my own musing but feel free to answer any of them. MOOI cannot count how many times I read about the searches which overlooked the missing people
They were later found by pure coincidence by passers-by,
not far from the places they were missing or seen last.
In the areas that had been previously searched.
JMO
If he’s buried or hidden, thermal detection could get tricky. It depends on whether a contrast shows. Shallow cover or bushes might still leak some heat, but if he’s underground or fully shielded, the signal may not show or surface. No contrast = no detection.If that is the case, wouldn't the thermal helicopters have picked him up on the first day?
Regardless, what incidents could even happen by a sand pit other than getting trapped inside?
If that is the case, wouldn't the thermal helicopters have picked him up on the first day?
Regardless, what incidents could even happen by a sand pit other than getting trapped inside?
IMO - Personally, I find it absolutely staggering that bodies so often turn up in previously searched areas. How does this happen? What exactly are the searchers doing for it to so often appear that human beings searching for a body in any kind of rural area, are woefully inadequate. Is there anything that can be changed to make searches more successful? Why are human bodies so difficult to find, even when not purposefully hidden? My questions are merely my own musing but feel free to answer any of them. MOO
Is there a link anywhere that says this?He lived there.
Or he's been taken away from the house in a vehicle.
if family suspected that somebody known to him took him, could that explain the 3 hour reporting to police,
a head start for someone not verified as a caregiver but given leeway because of their family connection?
but for example if a child was in official family care and it had to be reported?Could a kidnapper anrrive unseen and unheard? Would such a kidnapper stop to close all the gates on their way out?
If that were the case, I doubt the police would have been called.
It's not very likely, given that this was an area where neighbours would know one another's business. One doesn't get away with much in a rural community, Someone would have reported their suspicions.
I'm curious to know whether you've taken into account that the property has been described as 6,000 hectares, which is about 15,000 acres.Agree, we live on a property and we are very self reliant. But this is what bothers me; when living on a rural, isolated property - you become more in tune and guarded with any out of the ordinary. You always have eyes and ears open up until bed time. I know where each of my dogs are 24x7 and where all the cattle and chickens are.
If the family have lived on the farm for years, they would be in tune with every part if it and fully aware of every slightly dangerous part of the property.
To the extent of knowing where every hole is, or every part of soft sand etc..it becomes instinctive…
With all that being said, they would have heard a car come near the property and they would have noticed their dogs becoming anxious when Gus was walking away.
There are wild animals which could have posed a threat - but there would have been something found.
Falling down a hole is probable too
Poor kid
Advice concerning searches:
"- Get a map of the area and separate it into grids.
- Appoint one person as the 'Map Holder'
and have them assign people to different areas of the grid.
- Break into smaller groups of 4 or 5 people if possible
and spread those groups in several places of the area.
- Go slowly
and look at your surroundings.
- Walk along the area side by side,
arm-length apart
try and maintain the same pace as your team."
IMO,
2 last points are very important.
Walking slowly side by side looking at surroundings carefully.
Ground searches - Missing Persons Guide
Police have limited resources and will only conduct ground searches if there is evidence to suggest that a missing person's disappearance is suspicious.www.missingpersonsguide.com
In the country, it's well known that you leave the gates how you found them. The thing is though, if some/all of the gates were not in view of the house (which would be highly likely given the size of the property), then with all the comings and goings of police, SES and volunteers it could be unclear if they were all left in the state they were originally. Now I'd imagine most of the people coming onto the property would follow the "leave it how you find it" rule, but if someone DID change the way they were left, it might not be evident or concerning to the home owners, as they may not necessarily think it was done as anything more than an accident.Could a kidnapper anrrive unseen and unheard? Would such a kidnapper stop to close all the gates on their way out?
If that were the case, I doubt the police would have been called.
It's not very likely, given that this was an area where neighbours would know one another's business. One doesn't get away with much in a rural community, Someone would have reported their suspicions.
I have an idea that at least some of the gates were on Oak Park Road, and that that's the road that has been described as "in theory, a public road"; while the "highway" is the Barrier Highway, some tens of kilometres off. Oak Park Road passes the homestead (at a distance of about 300 metres). I wonder if it leads anywhere in the other direction that a kidnapper could be going. It hasn't sounded like there are six gates in both directions? I don't know why it would be assumed that any possible kidnapper would be headed for the highway.In the country, it's well known that you leave the gates how you found them. The thing is though, if some/all of the gates were not in view of the house (which would be highly likely given the size of the property), then with all the comings and goings of police, SES and volunteers it could be unclear if they were all left in the state they were originally. Now I'd imagine most of the people coming onto the property would follow the "leave it how you find it" rule, but if someone DID change the way they were left, it might not be evident or concerning to the home owners, as they may not necessarily think it was done as anything more than an accident.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.