Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

[JLZ]

There is always going to be inconsistencies during a cover up. imo

One could also argue the converse. There are always going to be inconsistencies in recollections of a real event; whereas consistency may be a sign of collaboration, invention, cover-up.

 

[Beans]

Oops DBM

 

[spiritualdreaming]

Just re-reading the police report from yesterday. The police searched also on 2nd February this year ... 4 days ago.
Not only on 14th and 15th of January this year.


Det. Supt. Fielke said as a result of recent investigations on 14 and 15 January 2026 detectives attended Oak Park Station and executed a search warrant.

On 2 February 2026 Task Force Horizon officers searched several locations around Oak Park Station for the remains of Gus.

https://www.police.sa.gov.au/sa-police-news-assets/add-to-all-lsas/disappearance-of-gus-lamont-declared-a-major-crime

Wow they hid the 2nd of February 2026 search well from media. Wonder why that bit of information wasn't mentioned in the actual live video presser.

Wonder if LE are searching pinged cell locations within the property.

 

[Detechtive]

That article is actually from March 2015. 11 years ago.

Since then Andrew Ey has received a ‘pre-eminent’ rating in 2023 for criminal law in the distinguished Doyle’s Guide of Australia’s leading lawyers.

He has also achieved murder acquittals for Frankie Marshall in 2010, Nicholas Novakoic in 2016 and Thomas Pinnington in 2023.

(paraphrased from)

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/gus-lamonts-grandparents-josie-murray-and-shannon-murray-engage-lawyers-amid-major-crime-investigation/news-story/0ee5cc1b1bd1b3a7346b41ad79d88a46?amp

Yeah, I still found it interesting - especially to be charged for finger pointing how embarrassing.

 

[SouthAussie]

Yeah, I still found it interesting - especially to be charged for finger pointing how embarrassing.

Kind of a puerile charge. The officer must have been very annoyed.

imo

 

[Detechtive]

You know what gets me?
That regardless of alllllll the other information we have (or don’t have), there has never seemed to be any physical evidence that Gus was at the property, full stop.
No footprints.
No clothing.
No belongings.
Pause and think on that a moment.

How long had Gus and Mum been living on the property?

Because if you have had any dealings with children of Gus’ age, you will know, without a doubt that 4 year olds leave stuff EVERYWHERE. I mean toys, hats, shoes, socks, stones and sticks, sand, dirt, sticky handprints, crumbs, plush toys, figurines, art and craft stuff, story books, lego etc etc etc

Footprints a PLENTY should’ve been stamped and stomped from one end of that property to the other (at least around the house).

But we have seen media reports saying “no physical evidence” he was there.
Does that include any small clothing? Dirty laundry? Little shoes? Child-friendly foods? Toys in the bathtub? Bedding?

In the absence of any remarkable items or footprints around the immediate house means he WAS NOT OUTSIDE.

Are we looking at a situation where Gus was contained indoors only?
And why would that be?

Just these points have been sticking in my head.
And I know that police have said the parents are in the clear, but police could be playing a long game here. Don’t assume that what they tell the public is everything they have, or in anyway 100% truth.

Just my thoughts.

Has it been said that there were no belongings of the child at the property? I haven’t seen that before.

 

[PolyDot]

You know what gets me?
That regardless of alllllll the other information we have (or don’t have), there has never seemed to be any physical evidence that Gus was at the property, full stop.
No footprints.
No clothing.
No belongings.
Pause and think on that a moment.

How long had Gus and Mum been living on the property?

Because if you have had any dealings with children of Gus’ age, you will know, without a doubt that 4 year olds leave stuff EVERYWHERE. I mean toys, hats, shoes, socks, stones and sticks, sand, dirt, sticky handprints, crumbs, plush toys, figurines, art and craft stuff, story books, lego etc etc etc

Footprints a PLENTY should’ve been stamped and stomped from one end of that property to the other (at least around the house).

But we have seen media reports saying “no physical evidence” he was there.
Does that include any small clothing? Dirty laundry? Little shoes? Child-friendly foods? Toys in the bathtub? Bedding?

In the absence of any remarkable items or footprints around the immediate house means he WAS NOT OUTSIDE.

Are we looking at a situation where Gus was contained indoors only?
And why would that be?

Just these points have been sticking in my head.
And I know that police have said the parents are in the clear, but police could be playing a long game here. Don’t assume that what they tell the public is everything they have, or in anyway 100% truth.

Just my thoughts.