Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

[linge]

Wow, that's kinda offensive to the OP Imo. Please read the OP's post. They transcribed it themselves and I happen to believe they are not lying.

No doubt the ABC YouTube transcript, which is full of inaccuracies, spelling and grammar mistakes which make it very difficult to read, was done using some sort of AI/computer software. IMO

None taken. AI's at a point where it can quickly generate a transcript that looks like it would be right...but then if you pay attention, it falls apart, because it doesn't actually understand the content of what people say (not to mention the hallucinations). Sometimes it's 'good enough,' but when the exact details count, you still can't trust it.

 

[jepop]

None taken. AI's at a point where it can quickly generate a transcript that looks like it would be right...but then if you pay attention, it falls apart, because it doesn't actually understand the content of what people say (not to mention the hallucinations). Sometimes it's 'good enough,' but when the exact details count, you still can't trust it.

That makes sense and no prob. I was just surprised by the comment because you pointed out that it was your own work. Again, thanks for your efforts!

 

[Dotta]

Police have strategic reasons for saying so - and they’re not obliged to disclose that to us.

Let's see how quick the charges come,
because the Suspect status cannot be indefinite, right?

Somebody is EITHER Guilty or Innocent.

(Like have a cake and eat it too hahaha)

JMO

 

[TeachPeace]

It feels absurd to me that that someone’s sexual orientation / gender identity is more important to protect than motive and dynamics in a case where a child is missing. It’s possibly relevant in a coercive relationship, IMO

For instance, I watched a US crime recently where the husband was gay and he killed his wife because he was hiding it from her. His sexual orientation was THE motive and fundamental to the case. Why is it different here?

Sexuality has absolutely nothing to do with Gus being missing. Please stop trying to connect the two. It's offensive on so many levels.
Referring to another case, you state ' His sexual orientation was THE motive...'. Being gay is not a motive for killing someone.

 

[cckp72]

Does the latest presser change anyone’s views on the gentleman that called into that radio show saying he knew Gus was still alive?

Oh gosh, I forgot about this. I took him as a fraud, but I would really be happy to be wrong!

 

[jepop]

Oh gosh, I forgot about this. I took him as a fraud, but I would really be happy to be wrong!

I just think he was probably over invested, but sincere. He really wanted to believe Gus was lost but still alive somehow. Jmo

 

[Dotta]

I just think he was probably over invested, but sincere. He really wanted to believe Gus was lost but still alive somehow. Jmo

It was so sad
to hear that nobody was searching for little Gus.

I refer to the man who called a radio station and his plea to find the boy.

JMO

 

[Rikissa]

Further to this - I don’t know many women who would stay in a romantic relationship where their former husband becomes a woman meaning the biological female essentially is forced to become a lesbian if they continue in that relationship.

It just doesn’t work like that unless the bio female is bisexual from the outset, and my gay friends assure me that they were born gay and would be aghast at having to change their sexuality for their late in life transitioning partner.

I also note that Josie former Robert only transitioned after Shannon’s father died and after the inheritance.

I can’t imagine that was easy for poor Shannon. I have wondered why any heterosexual woman would stay in that situation and the only thing I can think of is that she didn’t want to but had no choice because she would lose her generational family farm. iMO

Do you mean that the only reason a heterosexual woman would chose to stay in a relationship with someone is to have access to a sexual relationship? If I understand it the grandparents have been together for a very long time, so I would think that there are many more important connections between them, and sex might never have been the #1 priority in their relationship.