Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

  • #4,641
I don't know anything about Australian law. (And for that matter I'm not a lawyer in my own country, the U.S.)

But in the U.S. if a person is labeled a suspect publicly there can begin to be a legal risk to the prosecutors if they don't eventually give a person an ability to defend themselves without taking away a persons right to remain silent. It could become an abuse of power without even using the courts, turning the suspect into a victim.

If LE publicly accuses, and doesn't ever indict, or takes too long to indict, they are participating in destroying a reputation while never giving a person a day in court. In addition, the longer such an accusation is in the ether without a charge, the more biased potential jurors become. The suspect begins to have a very valid defense that LE tainted the jury pool.

So LE in the U.S. avoids saying out loud who figures in their criminal theories too soon.

MOO

idk about this in particular but I do know we have some of the strongest anti defamation laws, much more so than the US. unsure about how that all applies to policing exactly, my knowledge of it is in a different area, but its stricter than you'd think
 
  • #4,642
I'm not surprised at all. 😞
Why is little Gus mentioned as "vanished" only, but not where HE was living?

I had thought the unique living situation was a fairly good indicator 🤔
 
  • #4,643
It can now be revealed the couple had separated before Gus vanished, with Ms Murray (Jess) and her newborn son, Ronnie, living with her parents, Shannon and Josie Murray, on the remote station.”

“Several sources have told the Daily Mail that Mr Lamont attended Oak Park station two days after his son vanished.

The family friend claims Mr Lamont got into a furious row with Jessica's father, Josie, during the desperate search, after previous disputes.

Gus's devastated mother, Jessica, 39, has never spoken or appeared publicly since her son vanished, but locals say she is 'shocked' by the police statement last week.”

From the Daily Mail

note: All sources in the article are cited as “locals, friends or family friends” so not actually confirmed by the Murray and Lamont families.





Notice in your linked article where it says "Gus Lamont's parents had split up just months before the toddler vanished from his grandparents' outback sheep station, a family friend has revealed."

When I follow the blue "revealed" link, it takes me to an Oct 2025 article that says nothing about them splitting up.
The family friend in the Oct 2025 article says that Jess & Josh didn't live together because Josh clashes with Josie.
The friend also says that Jess & Josh have a commuter relationship.


 
  • #4,644
I think its important to distinguish available evidence/public information from assumption here. Much of the public have now hypothesised murder in Gus’s case… even though there’s no indication of this yet.

Once that assumption is made, behaviours (like that of Josie’s) are going to be analysed and on occasion misinterpreted. (I am not exempt of course.)

Public speculation often ignores probability, context and psychology. This suggests preexisting bias and/or beliefs drive personal hypothesis.
 
  • #4,645
Just wondering if anyone has been to that National park before? Or if we have any images of it, wondering how dense it is, if there is waterways etc.
 
  • #4,646
Notice in your linked article where it says "Gus Lamont's parents had split up just months before the toddler vanished from his grandparents' outback sheep station, a family friend has revealed."

When I follow the blue "revealed" link, it takes me to an Oct 2025 article that says nothing about them splitting up.
The family friend in the Oct 2025 article says that Jess & Josh didn't live together because Josh clashes with Josie.
The friend also says that Jess & Josh have a commuter relationship.


Aah, well spotted, thanks. Sounds like Daily Mail’s usual strategy, huge clickbait headline with very tenuous rumours to back it up.

Often it seems they write these inflammatory articles to provoke a response from the people they are pursuing….dredging up photos from Jess Murray’s school years is really scraping the bottom of the barrel for new content.
 
  • #4,647
Due to the increase in Josie based theorising, I want to share my own observations. I have focused on behavioural analysis research and case studies/reports, applying my findings (and perception) to Josie’s overall public presentation.


Reminder: MOO

I believe Josie is demonstrating the typical behaviours expected of someone protecting their family at a time of trauma… instead of protecting themselves. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a consistent behaviour from Josie, perhaps playing a part in the relationship breakdown with Gus’s father.


As follows:


Protective/innocent reactions often look like:

• confrontation with media/police

• anger/defensiveness

• hyper vigilant

• controlling the environment

• “guarding” property or people

• fight mode (rather than calm)



The following is the other end of the spectrum, which I feel does not apply to Josie.


Deceptive/offender behaviour commonly looks like:

• over controlled

• rehearsed language

• distancing I.E the “child” instead of a name

• inconsistent timelines

• avoiding searches

• low urgency

• oddly calm or resigned presentation (often observed during initial police interviews)

• narrative management rather than action





Resources for those interested:


Vrij A. (2008 2018) Detecting lies and deceit (Book)


DePaulo et al (2003) Cues to deception meta-analysis
APA PsycNet Search Results


Robert M. Sapolsky (1994) Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers (Book)


That's interesting.

The thing that sticks out to me about this heart-breaking case is that Gus has a number of adults in his life.

There is one behavior on the part of every single one of them: they did not give photo(s). I'd like to know more about how that went down.

I wish I were able to read the notes or pick the brains of investigators who requested photos and the response. Did they dig though momentos, digital archive, etc., and try to find some? Did they seem troubled when not producing photos? Is it possible they just said no without seeming concerned that they were not producing one? Reading your post, I have some new vocabulary for the observations I wish I could make.

Did each parent seem protective, or did they seem to distance themselves and/or attempt to control the narrative?

I can't imagine anything more traumatic than not being able to find a precious child. I don't want to pile on to them. But I really wish I knew more about: what happened with each adult when photos were not produced. I think the sources you suggested look like legit starting places to interpret that information.

MOO
 
  • #4,648
Just wondering if anyone has been to that National park before? Or if we have any images of it, wondering how dense it is, if there is waterways etc.
I've been to Yunta and surrounding areas, the entire place is very dry and difficult. not sure about that specific national park but in general they tend to have a low or dried up creek if any waterway, lots of red dirt, sparse but numerous prickly as heck plants, some big gum trees that tend to drop branches. generally difficult places to walk and not exactly great coverage for hiding something or protection from the elements, but the places are huge. really difficult to get across how vast tbh. driving through it was always the place we didn't want to stay too long, Peterborough and Broken Hill are nicer and greener
 
  • #4,649
I think its important to distinguish available evidence/public information from assumption here. Much of the public have now hypothesised murder in Gus’s case… even though there’s no indication of this yet.

Once that assumption is made, behaviours (like that of Josie’s) are going to be analysed and on occasion misinterpreted. (I am not exempt of course.)

Public speculation often ignores probability, context and psychology. This suggests preexisting bias and/or beliefs drive personal hypothesis.
LE said there are only three possibilities: abduction, vanishing, homicide. And in the press conference they declared a major crime (which in this case only exists when homicide, or manslaughter is present) they ruled out all but the latter.
 
  • #4,650
Notice in your linked article where it says "Gus Lamont's parents had split up just months before the toddler vanished from his grandparents' outback sheep station, a family friend has revealed."

When I follow the blue "revealed" link, it takes me to an Oct 2025 article that says nothing about them splitting up.
The family friend in the Oct 2025 article says that Jess & Josh didn't live together because Josh clashes with Josie.
The friend also says that Jess & Josh have a commuter relationship.


The link Old Soul posted now takes me to a paywalled article ( when I first read it when it was first posted in was free ) It's still the same article thou & you can read it using the the archive web site ( not sure if I can put the link here ? )



Today's DM article states that a " Family friend " says that Josh & Jess split up "shortly" after Ronnie was born.

That Jess & Ronnie ( as a new born ) lived at Oak Park with Shannon & Josie

That Josh lived at his house @ Belalie North that he was renovating

A "local" says they haven't seen Josh since Gus went missing.

"locals" say Jess was rarely seen before Gus's disappearance.

A "friend" revealed that Josh & Jess never married

Several sources told the DM that Josh attended Oak park 2 days after Gus was reported missing & that he had furious row with Josie

DM states that "locals" state that Jess is "shocked" by the police statement last week.


DM states that "locals" claim that Shannon & Josie did not believe that Josh was a suitable match for Jess. Also states that Josh did work on Oak Park Station in the past.


Seems the DM has spent time at the library dragging up all Jess's school stuff thru year books etc - how does this has anything to do with Gus's disappearance ??


DM must be frustrated that they don't know where Jess is or be able to get recent pics of her IMO
 

Attachments

  • 1770681433037.webp
    1770681433037.webp
    108.5 KB · Views: 9
  • Like
Reactions: nao
  • #4,651
I grew up around isolated farmers and pretty rough old school Aussies. I totally get why some people think the aggressive /protective behaviour could just be that, but I don't. Everyones demeanour from what Ive seen lines up way more with the more dangerous people I knew, who either chose isolated places for their paranoia and control, or became paranoid and controlling due to the isolation idk.

not accusing anyone specifically, but DV is a really really big problem in Aus and ime rural communities are completely overrun by it. I don't even necessarily mean who most people are suspicious of, just that that dynamic is so much more common in families one way or another than most outsiders would realise, and creates a lot of tension and secrecy

I don’t disagree with you, DV is largely a problem in Australia. I’m glad you raised the issues around “secrecy” as this very much results in unreported incidents.

IMO, it’s also key to this case.

Data pulled from police reports show the majority of dv incidents occur in residential settings. This suggests dv is a predominantly private phenomenon, which is why it often goes unnoticed.

The unfortunate truth is the majority of us will not recognise or have the ability to reliably distinguish the signs.

I spent some time analysing Josie’s behaviour following the gun incident but found myself left with more questions than answers. (A largely difficult task without context.) Now with the recent update we do have a broader picture, effectively narrowing potential scenarios and increasing confirmation bias.
 
  • #4,652
LE said there are only three possibilities: abduction, vanishing, homicide. And in the press conference they declared a major crime (which in this case only exists when homicide, or manslaughter is present) they ruled out all but the latter.

Manslaughter is a qualifier of homicide.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
504
Guests online
3,964
Total visitors
4,468

Forum statistics

Threads
640,789
Messages
18,764,297
Members
244,717
Latest member
bw2029
Back
Top