Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

  • #4,721
For sure, although Imo it does need to be said it's just speculation that JL/JM took off at the crack of dawn to commence whatever it was they were doing on the station that day.

I think that for those who tend towards believing the basics represented in the police timeline back then are still considered to be solid by police now ( I lean that way at present), then all we can assume is that SM was alone with the children at the time she told police Gus went missing, and that JM/JL were out on the station.

For all anyone knows, JM could have gone out early and JL joined them after breakfast, or they both may have left after Gus was up. We don't have that level of detail available to us.

But if police are still working off the same time line that Gus disappeared that day ( ie not the day before for eg), then I think they must be quite certain that he was alive and well at the homestead that morning. If so, then Imo this will be because JL saw him before she left (whatever time that may have been,) and Police believe her. Jmo

Bouncing off to speculation as to what timeline police are working from * now*, below is something I picked up from the presser last week ( I made a post a ways back about it).

At about time stamp 32:36 the Supt. is asked:

"Does the time line from when he was last seen still stand?"

He replies "We are still working on that time line, yes".

I'd take that as a no, the timeline from when he was last seen apparently does not stand.

I feel like the Supt changed the question around to, "Might there be changes in the timeline in regards to when Gus was last seen?" And he answered yes.

MOO
 
  • #4,722
To keep this short as it does not relate to our GL case study, GJ himself went off on a completely different tangent and lost focus on the WT case and wasted valuable time that pushed the suspected main perpetrators out of focus, and yes he was shafted very quickly for those actions.
Drawing a parallel between both cases: we want SAPOL to do their job right and not have to go back to a verandah and comb through the sand pit. But if we may for a moment draw parallels between both cases then let us do so because both cases share similarities.
1. A young boy goes missing without a trace.
2. There are inconsistencies between versions of events especially the timeline and period of time allowing for a cover-up if a cover-up exists??
3. We find out much later that in the former that CA occurred with the other child not knowing if it occurred in the primary but in our present case this has not and I stress has not occurred afawk. However police most wisely used listening devices to detect CA in the WT case and saved a victim. Thank you officiers.
4. Electronic devices are involved.
5. Variations of events and timelines are strongly being questioned and definitely questioned in the WT case.
6. Many parties involved costing an immeasurable amount of time and money and valuable resources that could be used elsewhere and costing that effects every Australian.
7. Members of the family are distanced away from the claimed crime scene.
And the list could go on.
MOOs'
William Tyrrrell's thread is here , currently up to thread # 79

NSWPF have never charged / arrested any person/s in relation to WT's disappearance , well over 4yrs after naming the FM as a suspect.

Time will tell if your above assertions turn out to be correct or not re WT. IMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: nao
  • #4,723
I feel like the Supt changed the question around to, "Might there be changes in the timeline in regards to when Gus was last seen?" And he answered yes.

Since granma Shannon has engaged a defense lawyer, there is a possibility her evidence and actions are seen as indirectly implicated in the major crime declared.
It remains to be seen whether her evidence that she saw Gus around 5pm that day stands up in any court case.

We have no timeline for when Gus was last seen by a "third party."
For all we know, family may have arranged for Gus to go into hiding.

There are networks of people in Australia who arrange for kids to go into hiding to avoid a parent having contact with them. One network was arranging for a yacht to sequester kids to New Zealand and beyond.

Abductions aided and abetted by these networks have succeeding in keeping kids in hiding for periods several years..... All it takes is a family friend sympathetic to one parent or grandparent. Australia has a high rate of these sorts of abductions.

It has been noted that it is unusual for a family to refuse publication of an image of their missing child.
If an abduction was arranged
, those behind the abduction would certainly not want his photo published. This refusal was well before police ruled out abduction by a party unknown to the family, so abduction was a real possibility at that stage, and publishing a photo has often assisted police find abducted children....that's why the family were asked by police to publish a photo.
 
  • #4,724
William Tyrrrell's thread is here , currently up to thread # 79

NSWPF have never charged / arrested any person/s in relation to WT's disappearance , well over 4yrs after naming the FM as a suspect.

Time will tell if your above assertions turn out to be correct or not re WT. IMO
drsleuth,
Let us not close on this opportunity to draw on your experience on the WT case without putting your skills to use in this case we have at hand: the disappearance of Gus Lamont.
From your collective studies of the WT case are you able to provide us with any insight and direction in this case of GL that you believe we should be looking at given the pitfalls and failures in the WT case?
 
  • #4,725
[Snipped by me for focus]

It has been noted that it is unusual for a family to refuse publication of an image of their missing child.
If an abduction was arranged
, those behind the abduction would certainly not want his photo published. This refusal was well before police ruled out abduction by a party unknown to the family, so abduction was a real possibility at that stage, and publishing a photo has often assisted police find abducted children....that's why the family were asked by police to publish a photo.
RSBM for focus.

IMO. It's nothing but poster speculation that the anyone in this family "refused publication of a photo" A photo was published. As to the timing of it's release.

30th Sept 2025 (Commissioner Stevens)

"He said police believed Gus was still on the property, had not been taken and that releasing his image would serve no purpose in the search".

 
  • #4,726
I'd take that as a no, the timeline from when he was last seen apparently does not stand.

I feel like the Supt changed the question around to, "Might there be changes in the timeline in regards to when Gus was last seen?" And he answered yes.

MOO
At the very least, I think it means police still believe Gus went missing that day and not some other day prior. Jmo
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
702
Guests online
3,797
Total visitors
4,499

Forum statistics

Threads
641,215
Messages
18,769,669
Members
244,749
Latest member
batpig
Back
Top