• #5,221
Jason O'Connell, from Mid North Wildlife Rescue South Australia, volunteered his services within hours of Gus vanishing from his family's farm, drawing on decades of his SES training and specialist tracking skills to assist Major Crimes detectives.

The veteran searcher said there are 'two locations off property' that had raised concerns with his team based on what they saw, heard or were told by family.

He did not go into specifics about what was of interest at the two sites or whether any items had been found, but said one, a conservation park, was now a focus for police based on his tip, and that his team could not go there until cops had 'done their work'.

Mr O'Connell and his partner Jen Balchin previously spent about 100 hours scouring the isolated property, travelling more than 1200km across rough terrain and often searching alone through the night.

«The whole story is horrible, if what we believe is all true.»

This is a quote from a Volunteer Mr Aldrich cited in the article who was part of the team that was supposed to go out to a location in the national park right before the police announced their search.

This gives me chills, I don’t want to imagine what he means by that. That poor baby.
 
  • #5,222
Grandma Josie is fiercely protective of her privacy, when a reporter visited, she saw her off, while holding a shotgun.

1000022046.webp

1000022045.webp


 

Attachments

  • 1000022045.webp
    1000022045.webp
    102.1 KB · Views: 4
  • #5,223
This means police are clearly communicating the charges have nothing to do with the major crime which is suspected and currently being investigated. That's what unrelated means.
I thought I'd picked up on some threads that police don't actually have to quite honest in their phrasing of these kinds of things, for tactical reasons? That was maybe on the Jack and Lilly thread in Canada. Might not be the same for Australia?
JMO
 
  • #5,224
MOO
Sadly a lot of people find it difficult to admit when they've done something wrong, even when its an accident. It seems in some people's minds, its much easier to run away from or hide the truth.

MOO
RSBMFF
Or easier to try and blame somebody else.

A bit off-topic, but fwiw I grew up in a family where it was generally best not to admit to having done something wrong not even wrong 'by accident'. Much better to blame somebody else, and that included adults blaming children... For me up into my 30s admitting to a mistake felt like I was about to be emotionally annihilated. The cause in our family's case is multi-generational trauma and I've been able to move beyond it only through trauma therapy. Others in my family have not moved beyond the instinct to blame others... or even done any therapy. Before I was in therapy I didn't even understand why I so badly wanted to find out 'who was at fault' in every day life situations rather than anything tragic like this case or cases where there are legal implications. It wasn't till I was deep in therapy that the fear of impending emotional annihilation came up. I'm not excusing my past behaviour but trying to explain how it could come about since my family will not be the only family around with such behaviour. otoh I cannot imagine trying to run from this amount of 'mistake' or accident or whatever it was. But again, people are different and react differently.

JMO
 
  • #5,225
Yes they can iMO. Concrete is actually porous so properly trained dogs can get the scent even if buried many feet down, is my understanding

JMO
Correct. Somebody even provided a link from the BBC explaining it all, further upthread.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
285
Guests online
5,289
Total visitors
5,574

Forum statistics

Threads
642,922
Messages
18,791,680
Members
245,032
Latest member
Okiesleuthie90
Back
Top