Most of the people who join Websleuths have an interest in missing persons, unsolved murders and unidentified remains to begin with. That's why they joined. So it's a natural instinct to want to know more information regarding any of the above circumstances to see if fresh eyes can provide input to the search. Fortunately, many verified members of missing or murdered individuals welcome the input and expertise people on Websleuths can provide. Many police forces are inundated with unsolved cases and they go on the back burner when new cases arrive. So any input, whether from a crime junkie, a member who is an active investigator, a forensic specialist, a doctor, a lawyer, a weapons expert, a cartographer or a friend or family who will take any information to help solve a mystery.
I'm not sure if you are aware of it, but there are hundreds of Websleuths members who have actually solved unidentified remains by their sheer will of ceaselessly reviewing information, visiting the location of the discovery of the remains, or following the path a missing person last took. Yes, even information that may seem obscure or lacking in clues like a video of an unknown street.
Personally, I'm curious as to why someone would be hesitant to have fresh eyes on a missing case of someone they knew and cared about.
And whether you or family members may feel having complete strangers picking over the facts of Ahmed's disappearance an invasion of privacy, when someone is missing, murdered or unidentified they become public property. That's just the way it works. If someone dies by their own hand and is an unknown quantity, when their identities are finally revealed months, years of even decades later, there is a natural process where the name of the deceased is kept private for the victim's family's sake, if that's what they want. Unless the person moved into iconic status like Mostly Harmless (an unidentified male who was found in a tent in the Florida wilderness in 2018.) Books have been written about him as well as a documentary.