Found Alive Australia - CC, 3, Bundaberg QLD, 10 April 2014 - #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #441
  • #442
  • #443
Yes its a bit of a concern that Chloe went missing the night before rubbish day.
I would like to know what time the rubbish is collected? Very early morning I assume?
Has it been stated when she was last seem by someone besides the immediate family?

The rubbish worries me as well, the company that collects states that it has to be put out prior to 5am on the morning of collection, so I'd say that's when they start their collections.

I was under the impression that most garbage trucks have camera's on them filming the rubbish as it is emptied into the truck, so I would think if the driver was doing his job he should have noticed, but not if she was wrapped in the sleeping bag.

No statement to say when she was last seen prior, other than the parents.
 
  • #444
Reported on 10 that the Morcombe's have reached out to the family to offer help.
 
  • #445
  • #446
  • #447
I guess I'm wondering if there was a favourite 'uncle' who perhaps used to crash on the couch sometimes. Someone who may have stayed in the 2nd bedroom that night as the girls were all sleeping in the living room.

I would feel so unsettled having my child regularly sleeping in such an open area as the living room - but that's just me. Everyone is different.
 
  • #448
This bit also caught my attention. "He said he could not help but think of the Daniel Morcombe case"? Daniel was a teenager, Chloe is a 3 year old girl. Daniel was abducted in broad daylight from a bus stop, Chloe has gone missing from her house. I can't see the connection at all? Unless he thinks the ending is going to be the same, that she will be found deceased? Maybe its just me, but it seems a strange connection to make.

Yes, I agree.

My first thought was of Trinity Bates - taken from her bedroom window by someone known by the family.

Also because it happened in the same area (Bundaberg) and I assumed that parents in the area would have remembered her case...


I think catswhiskers is probably right though - the Daniel Morcombe case is fresh in everyone's minds, due to the recent trial, so perhaps that's why the comparison was made.
 
  • #449
  • #450
Screen caps taken from the link below. Click images to enlarge.

IMO the gap between the car and the house would be a long stretch even for a full grown man to climb in or out of that small window. It would be extremely difficult to remove even a small child, climb onto the bonnet of the car (with one foot) and take off. All without waking the child. Nup, doesn't work for me.

Car-and-window1.jpg

Car-and-window2.jpg

Window-above-car.jpg

In the aerial shot below, it seems that the car is parked more towards the rear of the house. If Chloe was in fact abducted, it may not have been too difficult to enter and depart via the back door.

aerial-view.jpg

Front-view.jpg


http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...-distraught-20140410-36fum.html#ixzz2yTdfhf4j
 
  • #451
  • #452
Hi Katie :seeya:


:welcome6:
 
  • #453
Does anyone think the family moved by their own choice?
Or do you think LE asked them to leave?
 
  • #454
The gap between the house and the car is even too far for someone to look in the window IMO, let alone use as access to the house.
 
  • #455
Does anyone think the family moved by their own choice?
Or do you think LE asked them to leave?

LE probably secured the home for investigative purposes.
 
  • #456
Does anyone think the family moved by their own choice?
Or do you think LE asked them to leave?

They would have been asked to leave, forensics have been there today and possibly yesterday.
 
  • #457
Screen caps taken from the link below. Click images to enlarge.

IMO the gap between the car and the house would be a long stretch even for a full grown man to climb in or out of that small window. It would be extremely difficult to remove even a small child, climb onto the bonnet of the car (with one foot) and take off. All without waking the child. Nup, doesn't work for me.

View attachment 42697

View attachment 42698

View attachment 42699

In the aerial shot below, it seems that the car is parked more towards the rear of the house. If Chloe was in fact abducted, it may not have been too difficult to enter and depart via the back door.

View attachment 42700

View attachment 42701


http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/que...-distraught-20140410-36fum.html#ixzz2yTdfhf4j

With all of the children's play equipment in the small front garden, while there seems to have been a big back garden, anyone could have easily watched the children regularly from the street, or from a window somewhere along the street. Or even when walking through the neigbourhood.

And yes, the car does seem to be parked more toward the rear of the house.
 
  • #458
I wonder where the parents bedroom is? Also looking at Makara's screenshots whoever went in or out the window would have to duck for the blinds. The gap in the window isnt that wide either. MOO
 
  • #459
With all of the children's play equipment in the small front garden, while there seems to have been a big back garden, anyone could have easily watched the children regularly from the street, or from a window somewhere along the street. Or even when walking through the neigbourhood.

And yes, the car does seem to be parked more toward the rear of the house.

So the lounge room is at the back of the house - unusual.

They're on a corner, I don't think anyone could watch them more if the equipment is in the front yard or the back, maybe Mum could watch them better in the front yard - IDK
 
  • #460
They would have been asked to leave, forensics have been there today and possibly yesterday.

That is what I thought but I didn't want to seem accusatory with WS TOS.
;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
3,109
Total visitors
3,238

Forum statistics

Threads
632,567
Messages
18,628,498
Members
243,199
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top