- Joined
- Sep 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,575
- Reaction score
- 13,540
Yes this is interesting if factual.So your saying he had an office by himself? In a remote area of the building? Can you tell me which level?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes this is interesting if factual.So your saying he had an office by himself? In a remote area of the building? Can you tell me which level?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ShellyGale,
I have read your tendency to look towards 'outside substances' to explain the perpetrator's behaviour and lack of self-control, and while we can't rule this out and I would be happily proven incorrect, I think it is somewhat misguided. I would agree with you that the CSK is an addict - to dopamine. He is a serial sexual offender with offences which have started at a relatively young age, which means that as he was becoming sexualised (as an adolescent, or possibly even younger) he was relating to sex through a set of increasingly 'deviant' or distorted thoughts and fantasies. Over this period of time his neural pathways for sexual arousal and gratification would have become increasingly consolidated such that it would require exposure to increasingly strong and extreme sexual stimuli (mental, visual, physical) to achieve the same amount of dopamine release and arousal, hence the escalation in sexual offences. This would mean engaging in increasingly violent behaviours and taking greater risks. My point being that there does not need to be an additional substance to fuel his behaviour; his neurological wiring and brain's neurochemical thirst for dopamine release, and the influence and active indulgence in his thoughts and fantasies around sex and control more than explain this. To echo the thoughts of others, an introverted, emotionally avoidant, control-oriented and organised individual would not likely be a 'throw caution to the wind' risk taker, rather, it would more likely be that he would savour all aspects of the minutiae of his MO as his fantasies build towards enaction. Given this, while he might have ceased physical offences, without significant therapeutic and behaviour change intervention intervention it is unlikely that his neurological wiring and tastes sexual stimuli have changed much, and we would anticipate he has addiction to extreme pornography only available on the dark web where he could access that type of content, possibly engage in 'like-minded' social networks, maybe even mutually brag about past achievements to relive the excitement and fuel further fantasies.
No Shelly, he has only been on the radar for the last few weeks. <modsnip>
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Karragullen is a well used dumping ground and suicide forest (spooky like Aokigahara). In the late 70's a woman was burnt on a log in the bush and although she had links to witchcraft initiation was ruled out but it was a great story I recall growing up.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/137006624?searchTerm=kerryn tate murder&searchLimits=
Karragullen cannot be ruled out IMO and/or the IO
Another Sarah Lee Davey aged 21 or 22 went missing in Broome in the evening of Tuesday 14 January 1997. Fishing holiday or work trip anybody?
https://www.missingpersons.gov.au/who-missing/wa/davey-sara
I'm just throwing out my own conclusions from the last few pages I've read.
While the type of music BRE may have been listening to may give an insight to his state of mind at a certain period in time in no way do I think it reflects any indication of psychopathy or intent, the same goes for his FB likes, there is a difference between interest and obsession. Now if he had liked rape and murder pages then I'd be worried.
I don't think there is anything wrong with him being a 48 y/o gamer. I grew up on nintendo and at 35 I still love video games, it is a form of entertainment no different to watching movies/tv etc. and guess what, here is a small fact, Adult females make up the biggest gaming demographic at 35% and adult males make up another 34% while kids of both sexes only make up 31%.
Stating someone may have homosexual/transexual/bisexual/cross dressing tendencies because of the way they walk or their posture is one of the most ridiculous things I've heard. IMO I think it possible he may cross dressed but I make this assumption purely on the fact that it is alleged that he steals womens underwear and has nothing to do with his appearance in anyway.
I don't think SS was dumped at sea, although possible I am of the theory that she was more of an opportunistic attack as opposed to pre meditated, I'm sure the CSK planned on raping but I don't think murder was his initial intention, I think he panicked a little and made sure to conceal her more than he did his other victims.
At this stage locating SS is like a needle in a haystack, so many places to dump a body that would never be found, we are talking millions of hectres. I'd like to see the community go back to the discussion of where he murdered his victims, WAPOL stated the girls were not killed at the same places they were disposed, if he slit their throats as has been indicated in a couple of reports we are talking 5 litres of blood, that makes one helluva mess. there was information from a new user that BE had an office in claremont, can this be confirmed? where else may he have murdered his victims after the abducion?
I might ring Hakea & see if I can go have a chat![]()
image upload with preview
And guess what also happened in Adelaide that day.....
Adelaide 16.10 (106) d West Coast Eagles 4.7 (31) at Football Park - Friday 4, July, 1997
There was a suicide confession from a possible perp for that one
http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/wes...r/news-story/dd98e4a7de666697eef5de68f7c4ce46
I'd say its more to do with hiding ab's prior charges. Bre seems to be cleanskin.I've also wanted to ask others this for a while now - do the subjudice rules differ from state to state here in Australia?? I'm asking because I've been surprised that so many photos of BRE have been posted here since his arrest, in comparison with say the Jill Meagher case, where as soon as he was arrested all images of AB seemed absolutely forbidden. And I don't mean just here on WS - everywhere online his photos were pixelated or deleted elsewhere and in the media too. So what is the difference otherwise between the two cases?
Allegedly I Strangely enough 6-9months ago I took my mother to Karrakatta cemetery and this guy was walking along the road towards me (in my car) But the thing was he was looking downwards and away left. That is so unusual and I stared this person down and he looked up and grinned. I even said this is the CSK. The age and size of him. I always said if it was one person and no martial arts back ground it had to be a big man. So in regards to your question. Not as shocked. Also have you seen a pic of him at high school and look a MM.Asking all WS'ers: what was your very first reaction to the man in the photo (BRE) who is the alleged CSK?
I don't mean your intellectual reaction eg: they got it the so-and-so.
I don't mean you secondary emotional reaction when, like possibly disgust or anger, when you realised maybe the police had their man.
I mean your very first emotional or gut reaction.........
For me, my initial intellectual thought was '"that can't be him!" while my initial emotional reaction to the man in the photo was sympathy and confusingly, a sense of likability.
And no, I'm no lover of serial killers!!!! I'm not crazy either!
I'm asking because maybe each of the victims had the same emotional/gut reaction to BRE/alleged CSK, if he is in fact the CSK???
Maybe BRE expertly hides his dark side while successfully portraying a nice, friendly, average type guy who gives off no scary vibes???
Maybe thats why 3 intelligent women possibly willingly got into the car with a stranger, or at least loitered long enough chatting with him that he could pull them into his car.
Either BRE is not the CSK or he is brilliant at disguising his dark side!!!!