- Joined
- Dec 30, 2016
- Messages
- 2,314
- Reaction score
- 8,530
Just a process of elimination.Good luck with that PD!
Now to see if the damage matches the right drivers sides of any model of vehicle...
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
Just a process of elimination.Good luck with that PD!
Just a process of elimination.
Now to see if the damage matches the right drivers sides of any model of vehicle...
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
No. It cant happen indefinitely but it depends on the cause of the delay & whether its justifiable. Judges can and do get jacked off & may decide to move things along, then both sides had better make sure they're ready - but its a huge case & Supreme Court takes a while. Theres plenty of innocent people sitting in jails waiting for their day in court to come up & most havent been charged with double murder. If and when he's tried, if he's found guilty of any or all charges, his sentence will be backdated to the date of arrest and time already served will be deducted. If he's found guilty of either of the murders it doesnt make much difference anyway, he wont be getting out anytime soon. Each offence would likely attract jail time on its own and theres no way the judge is letting him out on bail. If he's innocent, he 's not the first and wont be the last to have served time for nothing nor to have spent a fortune defending yourself against something you didnt do. Sure, its totally unfair, but thats just how it goes Im afraid. Its one reason our legal system should allow for awarding of costs in our higher courts too.Hi everyone - I have been thinking about how the accused CSK's court hearing was delayed till Feb 28 2018. Is this something that can keep happening indefinitely or does there come a time when no more delays are allowed.
Also by Feb he will have been in jail over a year. Based on the fact that he hasn't said he is guilty or innocent how can he be locked up in jail for so long. Is there a time limit on keeping people locked up without a trial? Sorry if this is a dumb question but I know very little about the law. MOO
Has anyone done a 3D map so we can compare the indentations, to say, a 1986 Toyota Hilux?Waves + car + pylon = dents in car ?[emoji362]
Looks like a reef bottom around the pylon area .
You dont always see that reef , imo .
https://goo.gl/images/6UZT2u
![]()
![]()
![]()
No. It cant happen indefinitely but it depends on the cause of the delay & whether its justifiable. Judges can and do get jacked off & may decide to move things along, then both sides had better make sure they're ready - but its a huge case & Supreme Court takes a while. Theres plenty of innocent people sitting in jails waiting for their day in court to come up & most havent been charged with double murder. If and when he's tried, if he's found guilty of any or all charges, his sentence will be backdated to the date of arrest and time already served will be deducted. If he's found guilty of either of the murders it doesnt make much difference anyway, he wont be getting out anytime soon. Each offence would likely attract jail time on its own and theres no way the judge is letting him out on bail. If he's innocent, he 's not the first and wont be the last to have served time for nothing nor to have spent a fortune defending yourself against something you didnt do. Sure, its totally unfair, but thats just how it goes Im afraid. Its one reason our legal system should allow for awarding of costs in our higher courts too.
In regard to JC boyfriends - theres at least 1 article posted in a prior thread featuring one of her boyfriends. I think he may have travelled over from Vic to help look or something. Do a search for her name & you'll find all the discussions & articles posted about her here previously.
Is it possible for the Moderator to establish a separate thread for the endless debate about the circumstances surrounding the entry of Fiat at Cottesloe Beach? Its making my head hurt
KK victim: iirc she was left with no clothes on.
Anyone know if her clothes, bag and shoes were found later on at the crime scene?
Or did the accused keep these items as trophies?
............................................
Posts my opinion unless source included. All my original text/images are my personal copyright and can't be reproduced outside of WebSleuths without my permission.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]
CSK?,Like a previous poster mentioned it is absurd to think a boat and crane were used to dump the car into the beach. With a boat and crane at your disposal the car would never ever be found again.
More than likely the car was dumped not far from the shore, either pushed or driven, but most likely pushed into the water and then over the next few days the tides and currents shifted the car into the location in which it was found. with strong enough currents that car would have been thrown around like a rag doll along the sea bottom which could explain any damage to the exterior. currents can shift objects that weigh several tonnes with absolute ease, don't underestimate the power of the ocean or the simplicity of the method used to dispose of this vehicle.
With the lights being left on I imagine a scenario of someone driving the car as close as possible to the point of entry, exiting the vehicle and manually pushing it into the ocean. Then mother nature takes over.
Is it possible for the Moderator to establish a separate thread for the endless debate about the circumstances surrounding the entry of Fiat at Cottesloe Beach? Its making my head hurt
Is it possible for the Moderator to establish a separate thread for the endless debate about the circumstances surrounding the entry of Fiat at Cottesloe Beach? Its making my head hurt
Like a previous poster mentioned it is absurd to think a boat and crane were used to dump the car into the beach. With a boat and crane at your disposal the car would never ever be found again.
More than likely the car was dumped not far from the shore, either pushed or driven, but most likely pushed into the water and then over the next few days the tides and currents shifted the car into the location in which it was found. with strong enough currents that car would have been thrown around like a rag doll along the sea bottom which could explain any damage to the exterior. currents can shift objects that weigh several tonnes with absolute ease, don't underestimate the power of the ocean or the simplicity of the method used to dispose of this vehicle.
With the lights being left on I imagine a scenario of someone driving the car as close as possible to the point of entry, exiting the vehicle and manually pushing it into the ocean. Then mother nature takes over.
"Its making my head hurt"
Does that happen when you watch the
ol' claremont ghost videos too ?
Yep, that's why I rarely bother watching them anymore. Just rubbish.
In late May or early June, (1988) Julie rang her father to report an alarming incident in which she had been driving home in her Fiat sedan from work along the Stirling Highway.
Julie told her father, Roger, that a car had followed her closely for several kilometres along Stirling Highway, almost touching her rear bumper at times and seemed to be trying to force her off the road.
As she approached a turn-off in the beachside suburb of Cottesloe, the car pulled alongside and then suddenly veered in front of her.
Ms Cutler swerved around it and sped away, later reporting the incident to police.
As her stepsister related, years later, she called extremely upset. She thought whoever was in the car wanted to run her off the road or force her to pull over.
http://www.news.com.au/news/vanishe...g/news-story/1f9da6564bf58fdfb6f6532c5e7b5d2f
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
In late May or early June, (1988) Julie rang her father to report an alarming incident in which she had been driving home in her Fiat sedan from work along the Stirling Highway.
Julie told her father, Roger, that a car had followed her closely for several kilometres along Stirling Highway, almost touching her rear bumper at times and seemed to be trying to force her off the road.
As she approached a turn-off in the beachside suburb of Cottesloe, the car pulled alongside and then suddenly veered in front of her.
Ms Cutler swerved around it and sped away, later reporting the incident to police.
As her stepsister related, years later, she called extremely upset. She thought whoever was in the car wanted to run her off the road or force her to pull over.
http://www.news.com.au/news/vanishe...g/news-story/1f9da6564bf58fdfb6f6532c5e7b5d2f
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk
Two years beforehand, a road rage incident occurred on the Kwinana Fwy, near the Mill Point Rd intersection. (1986 12th April, Saturday - 1.30am).Pit manoeuvre rookie!
Obviously
............................................
Posts my opinion unless source included. All my original text/images are my personal copyright and can't be reproduced outside of WebSleuths without my permission.
[emoji317][emoji317][emoji317]
PD,Two years beforehand, a road rage incident occurred on the Kwinana Fwy, near the Mill Point Rd intersection. (1986 – 12th April, Saturday - 1.30am).
The incident involved Stuart Richardson (aged 25) driver of a Volkswagen with passengers who was his brother Matthew (18) and their two girlfriends. The other driver was driving a blue Gemini.
The road rage incident allegedly commenced when Stuart indicated and changed lanes. Stuart’s made a statement to the police, allegedly describing the other driver as going berserk, bouncing up and down inside his vehicle, in a furious rage, somewhat like a monkey, bashing at his horn, flashing his lights and making rude gestures with wild erratic manoeuvres closely behind.
The action continued as Stuart and passengers headed towards Fremantle Police Station, along Leach Highway alleging that the other driver repeatedly bumped into his rear, swiftly driving around and pulling alongside, bouncing in his seat like a madman, driving off, and then pulling in front and then suddenly slowing. As Stuart drove, the Gemini driver slammed on his brakes so that Stuart would bump into him again.
Upon arrival at Fremantle police station Stuart had intentions of reporting the matter and asking for the Gemini driver being charged. The Gemini driver jumped out of his car shouting at Stuart, "You've picked on the wrong bloke here mate!"
Stuart and passengers soon discovered that the Gemini driver was a police recruit. Both Stuart and the police recruit were tested for alcohol - Stuart’s was negative. The recruit’s alcohol level was 0.12, and was again retested, when the examining police officer claimed it was under the alcohol limit (0.8). The police recruit’s parents were called and attended the station just after the second BAC test given. (45 minutes is the standard time between administration of BAC tests). A duty Inspector was called to the station and took statements.
Neither Stuart nor the police recruit received any charges.
Stuart went to the media and repeated the allegations after he was dissatisfied with the outcome of the Police Inquiry.
Stories appeared in Newspapers the following week, like the Daily News, eg:and he was interviewed on television. A police response was given to the media later, reiterating there was no independent witnesses, and that there were conflicting accounts of what occurred.![]()
IE: His word against His word.
Sent from my HTC 2PQ910 using Tapatalk