So, is Officer Hosemans the only one of the three suspects who may have been protected by the police? Hence, so much evidence going missing.
I see that Hoseman's uncle is/was Assistant Police Commissioner Graeme Morgan in the State Crime Command, and later was promoted further.
Janine Vaughan: Eight years on, the trail is cold
Assistant Commissioner Graeme Morgan will be appointed head of the new State Crime Command, a body formed from the merger of Crime Agencies and the Intelligence Information Centre.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/top-crime-fighter-appointed-after-rethink-20021005-gdfp3o.html
Yep SA. The level of cover up is astounding, by all ranks.
Hoseman should not have even been working the case. He was working restricted duties & on a work place agreement.............I think from memory was not to have anything to do with the public.
He was up on sexual assault charges from an incident at Bathurst Golf Club , in which he was eventually dismissed from NSWPF & his charges were all eventually dismissed too

............. 2 months prior to Janine going missing.
https://media.opengov.nsw.gov.au/pa...V4yTUgVgUsQMtfzwsjnF9Ct3gppS6BoD2fm94eE0kambc
Pages 27 & 28
2.THE INITIAL NSWPOLICE INVESTIGATIONPOLICE INTEGRITY COMMISSION –REPORT TO PARLIAMENT –OPERATION RANI15
McFawn and was given a general overview of the investigation.42 Jacob’s evidence was that when he attended at Bathurst at that time his understanding was that Hosemans was in charge of the investigation.43
2.12 - What is clear from the evidence is that during the period 10 December to 16 December 2001, Hosemans had a significant role in the investigation of Ms Vaughan’s disappearance. That was at a time when Hosemans was facing serious criminal charges and his day to day activities were subject to an agreement between himself and Superintendent Kuiters, (Kuiters), the Local Area Commander, which restricted the work that he was permitted to undertake. The agreement is discussed in detail below.
HOSEMANS’ WORK PLACE AGREEMENT
2.13 - On 5 November 2001 Hosemans was charged with the offences of obscene exposure, assault, indecent assault, and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The charges arose out of an incident at the Bathurst Golf Club on 21 October 2001. The alleged victim of the assault offences was a female employee of the Club, aged 24 years. The charges were first mentioned in Bathurst Local Court on 3 December 2001 and the proceedings were extensively reported in the local newspaper, the Western Advocate, on 4 and 6 December 2001.
Ultimately Hosemans was acquitted of all charges on 19 July 2002 by Deputy Chief Magistrate Henson, (as his Honour then was). The reasons for his Honour’s decision will be returned to later in this Report.44
2.14 - On 8 November 2001 Hosemans entered into a Work Place Agreement, ostensibly with Kuiters, as a consequence of the criminal charges that had been preferred against him.45 The agreement was signed by Borland on behalf of Kuiters. Despite this Borland gave evidence that although he was aware of the agreement and the restrictions placed on Hosemans he was neither aware of the contents of the agreement, nor of its exact wording, and had never seen the agreement.46
2.15 - The agreement set out the terms on which Hosemans was to continue performing duties at Bathurst Police Station. The following terms are of significance:47
1. Detective Sergeant Hosemans will work under the direct supervision of the Commander or the person from time to time relieving in that position or the Crime Manger [sic]. ... 4
( # 2 seems to be missing

)
3. Detective Sergeant Hosemans will work from the office currently designated as the Crime Coordinator Office with in the Crime Management Unit area.
4. Detective Sergeant Hosemans is not to have any contact with members of the public.
( # 5 also seems to be missing


)
6. Detective Sergeant Hosemans will be responsible for the COPS quality reviews on a daily basis (when rostered). He will be responsible for case management follow up and advise [sic]. For quality review of all court briefs that will be presented to the D.P.P. and advising to other Police of any areas of deficiencies in those brief [sic].
7. Detective Sergeant Hosemans is not to absent himself from the Police Station at Bathurst with [sic] first obtaining the knowledge and consent of one of the person [sic] mentioned in point 1.



