As for the very, very neatly wrapped knife handle -- yeah, I was staring at that, too.
It's very hard to reconcile these things, in my mind...
-- Jenny spoke to a Work Cover employee at 8.49am and they had a fairly detailed, sensible conversation about her progress and pending return to work (inquest report, p2)
-- We are meant to believe she then suddenly suffered a severe depressive episode, and was disturbed enough that she would want to forgo available drugs that would bring her a relatively peaceful death, and stab herself through the heart like that -- and then took the time and care to very neatly wrap the handle of a massive knife in order to jam it in a window frame.
-- Thought to put on a sun hat and take allergy meds before she died.
Another thing I cannot understand is HOW this woman, who was THERE at the crime scene for hours and hours could a/ not know the knife was wrapped and / b get promoted.... WHY was she lying her



off about the knife handle? Simply to justify her destroying the knife, like an idiot? Or something more..? And isn't lying during an inquest illegal or idk, punishable, in some way, especially for a police officer?! There is something very wrong, here.
From findings of the inquest into the death of Jenny Lee Cook p 18-19
It cannot be accepted that DS Osborn’s evidence was at all truthful in regard to that matter.
Osborn stated emphatically that she had no knowledge, until a few days before the inquest, that the handle of the knife had been wrapped in string and tape. She said she had never heard that before and had never been told. She was then shown a supplementary form 1, completed by her, that contained that information. She stated, incredibly, that she had cut and pasted that information from that provided by the SOCOs but she had not read her supplementary form 1.
When it was later pointed out to her that she had signed that document as being true and correct, she immediately stated that she had in fact read it when she submitted it but had since forgotten about it.