- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 15,604
- Reaction score
- 105,162
I think this is going to be a long day for those involved, barristers, witnesses etc.
Yesterday the court corrected an interview date to November 2021 from November 2020 which was incorrectly written apparently. When I heard 2020 I was like “why wasn’t this brought up last year at inquest”, so wrong date makes sense.GGB - statement was taken 03 Nov 2020 ? so these dots were starting to join way back then ?
Oh lord, the technical issues, I feel like this part is gonna take a long time to get through.
I think this is going to be a long day for those involved, barristers, witnesses etc.
I thought it was '2000'Did todays witness say her statement was from January 2020?
I think this would be too long afterwards to be likely?I am scared of where this witness and questioning is going... acreage, secluded....
Woodburn is less than an hour drive south of Byron Bay. Only half hour south of Ballina.
I just don't understand why the Inquest is the place for revealing this information and investigating his character, this wouldn't be the place to accuse him of anything, would it?
It's fascinating to me, but I can't understand why the police aren't just working on either finding evidence to charge him, or eliminating him. Doesn't including him in the Inquest give him a bit of a heads up that he is under suspicion of something (if he is), and doesn't this give him more opportunity to do adopt a new guise and do a runner?
They have established that this man had a relationship with Marion which was previously unknown to her friends and family and that he was in contact with her just before she disappeared, so his evidence is vital to the circumstances around her disappearance. They must know where he is, because they indicated that they have taken a statement from him. What they are doing now is trying to establish a pattern of behavior with relation to his manipulations of vulnerable women, as this may indicate a way he behaved with Marion.
I suspect that there are a few motives in making these details public. One might be to flush out other victims, who may have previously thought they were the only one and been too ashamed to come forward. There may be other victims out there who can fill in some of the gaps about his movements or other aliases which might help to discover what happened to Marion.
I'm managing to follow the content of the, and I know that the purpose of the Inquest is to establish whether or not Marion Barter is living or has died. I assume there is no evidence that RB has committed any crime against Marion Barter, otherwise I expect he would have been charged already. So I'm wondering what is the basis for his inclusion in this process.
I thought it was '2000'
Did todays witness say her statement was from January 2020?
And Rich Richard...You can add 'Ric West' to this list.
How many names are we up to now.
And Rich Richard...