C
I may be wrong here, but I thought C said that on the 8th of June was when he was first approached by Police and at that time he denied knowing Marion Barter and he denied ever using the name Fernand Remakel.
But then he contacted Police and made a statement on June 9th. He said he originally said he lied because his wife was there on the 8th and he didn't want her to hear about it as she never knew about it before.
But I may be wrong.. there was so much new information yesterday!
ETA: but yes I totally agree with you that he is trying to pretend it never happened!
My understanding is that police spoke to him at home on the 8th.
The next day, RB went to police station and provided them with a signed statement.
Then they spoke again in September but the story started changing.
RB is denying both June and Sept incidents happened and is saying first contact was Oct/Nov.
Casselden pressed him why there was a difference between June and Sept, was it because he had more time to come up with a plan and story?
And RB replied that it was because he wife was present in June.
But that makes no sense because it still doesn't explain his written statement. He could have done that without his wife present.
It’s in Byron Bay this time.Different court set up today. Has it moved? Better view of the wonderful Mr Casseldon (George Clooney lined up to play him in the movie).
I don't think any of us would know the correct spelling of the first two names but my interpretation, as I can speak some French, is this:
1. Janine Le Roy
2. Nicole Renault (he said REN-O)
But I could be wrong.