Australia Australia - Marion Barter - Missing After Trip to UK - June 1997 #19

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #881
It’s bad taste posting as far as Iim concerned. The fb page has just posted a circus we know he’s a liar we know he talks utter bs a post like that doesn’t rise above him. It’s a missing person page not a comedic p take.

I get the frustration god it’s brain frying listening to him tell tale after tale but seriously if a websleuther posted such a thing with IMAGES like that it would be removed immediately.

Not to mention that the image sources are most likely used without authority.

It’s bad taste Joni (incase you are reading this)

I thought posts like that had stopped we ALL remember the Whitehouse fail..

JMO
IMO
 
  • #882
  • #883
I’m on a roll..

Could’ve at least removed the watermark all over the pilot image

Umm watermarked for a reason! It means you have to pay for it.. so the photographer and the actor get royalties.

Wow

Rant about the FB post is over

Thank you for your patience fellow sleuthers :)
 
  • #884
Less restrained than usual for sure, but I took it as absolute frustration at the lack of progress. AH is still enjoying life as a free citizen fully funded by the AU Govt and his “inheritances” as he calls them. No sign of AH being held to account and no sign of Marion.

Legal processes, the cogs grind slowly, but they are grinding IMO.

Also there's bound to be tons of background stuff that no-one is privy to JMO MOO

We don't know why RB is in this 'respite' care home but it could be a more formal arrangement than first meets the eye, also JMO MOO.

I don't go on FB so no idea what gives over there but why is everyone calling him AH nowadays please?
 
  • #885
Legal processes, the cogs grind slowly, but they are grinding IMO.

Also there's bound to be tons of background stuff that no-one is privy to JMO MOO

We don't know why RB is in this 'respite' care home but it could be a more formal arrangement than first meets the eye, also JMO MOO.

I don't go on FB so no idea what gives over there but why is everyone calling him AH nowadays please?
Something “hole” is my assumption haha
A name we can all agree on.
 
  • #886
  • #887
Less restrained than usual for sure, but I took it as absolute frustration at the lack of progress. AH is still enjoying life as a free citizen fully funded by the AU Govt and his “inheritances” as he calls them. No sign of AH being held to account and no sign of Marion.
Totally get the frustration part.
But rehashing old theories and thats what they are, with direct screenshots from WS and other sights is pure poor taste.

I do remember they too made errors in judgement eg FR Lux for example.
Or asking WS members to try and get posts removed when J is on here herself and others from the team.


All well and good in hindsight, as J would know.
Cant shoot the messenger if they dont have all the cards.

isnt that what WS is for?
sleuthing ?
in sleuthing theres going to be mountains of information that is completely unrelated after the cards are shown.

He listens to the podcast, he makes stories based around that too.

He had the BOE, he makes stories based upon what he reads in that too.

If J is going to accuse WS of posting information that he may use, then she may as well add podcast to that list.


Those images that are up there are plain wrong.
Its all a circus.

There's only one clown in this shetshow, we dont need anymore.
 
Last edited:
  • #888
  • #889
1
I’m on a roll..

Could’ve at least removed the watermark all over the pilot image

Umm watermarked for a reason! It means you have to pay for it.. so the photographer and the actor get royalties.

Wow

Rant about the FB post is over

Thank you for your patience fellow sleuthers :)
100%

Not to mention the back handed compliment in regards to using the Hines image to counteract AH lies. Meanwhile he too is a missing person.

I think J needs a holiday
 
  • #890
  • #891
Pretty sure it stands for "A Human" right!
 
  • #892
Can someone clarify my questions (using their spreadsheets!! :) ) please?
1) Did MB fly out of Brisbane the SAME DAY that she left LL's house and caught the bus?
Why? Maybe she stayed in Brisbane with RB a night or two.
2) Was the FNMR passport ever used?
3) Has anyone seen a photo of MB on her FNMR passport?
Why? Maybe she had her hair cut/coloured in Brisbane and related this alteration to Customs with a smile and "that's what women do".
 
  • #893
Deleted
 
Last edited:
  • #894
Deleted
 
Last edited:
  • #895
Long time stalker, first time poster.

I’d like to discuss the withdrawals from MB’s bank accounts. In 1994 when I had my drivers licence renewed I had long blonde permed hair and was 60 kgs (as were the 90’s) I married in 95, fell pregnant - Had my first child in 1996. During pregnancy I gained 18 kgs, had my hair cut into a straight bob style with with brown tips. After bubs was born we bought a bigger family car. I looked absolutely nothing like my 94’ 60kg perm chick in my licence photo. I also had no trouble at all using my DL, medicare card and a utility bill to withdraw over 10k to purchase a new car. I just laughed when the teller checked my DL compared to my new look saying ‘that’s what having kids does to you’ - So from my perspective, you definitely do not need to look identical to your DL photo to withdraw money. You just require varying forms of identification which we would all agree was likely available IF someone was posing as MB.

I always found the final withdrawal of 80k at a different bank to be highly unusual. Like ‘whoever’ didn’t want to return to the BB bank for the final withdrawal.

Secondly I’d like to mention MB’s wallet being stolen - am I correct that it was in 1994?

1994 was the year of the Le Corriere (sp?) ad. Is it possible MB replied to that ad, had a brief fling with FNR that didn’t go anywhere at that stage (they always say a conman will stick to the truth as close as possible - re: the 1968 Lucerne storyline of a brief fling) MB had just moved to the GC and was settling into her new role at TSS. She would be less likely to allow anyone to get her hooks into her. Is it possible that in 1994 that RB floated the idea of romance, marriage and a life abroad that MB rejected (around the time her wallet was stolen by a woman who supposedly looked like her) Could this be where it really all began? Said person already has her identification from 1994. Could the wheels have started turning then, unbeknownst to MB.

Fast forward to 1997 (by RB’s timeline he returned to Australia from Belgium in Octoberish 96) in late 96 MB received her teacher of the year award which was in the GC Bulletin. Re-enter RB after seeing MB in the newspaper. Things have reached a turning point for MB at TSS - Her relationship with GE is over - She’s vulnerable. A prime candidate to rekindle her relationship with FNR. The idea of romance, marriage and a life abroad is exactly what she wants.

Thirdly - has it ever been ascertained why the ad in Le Curriere (sp?) he was listed as MF Remakel not FNR? Was it a newspaper error - or was he going by MFR in 1994.

All speculative musings by me. Thoughts? (Sorry if all this has been mentioned - I haven’t trawled through everything on this site as yet)
 
  • #896
Im terribly sorry for the reposts. My post didn’t appear to be lodging.
 
  • #897
  • #898
Im terribly sorry for the reposts. My post didn’t appear to be lodging.
You can click on the three dots to edit, some write DBM (deleted by me). Happens sometimes.
 
  • #899
Long time stalker, first time poster.

I’d like to discuss the withdrawals from MB’s bank accounts. In 1994 when I had my drivers licence renewed I had long blonde permed hair and was 60 kgs (as were the 90’s) I married in 95, fell pregnant - Had my first child in 1996. During pregnancy I gained 18 kgs, had my hair cut into a straight bob style with with brown tips. After bubs was born we bought a bigger family car. I looked absolutely nothing like my 94’ 60kg perm chick in my licence photo. I also had no trouble at all using my DL, medicare card and a utility bill to withdraw over 10k to purchase a new car. I just laughed when the teller checked my DL compared to my new look saying ‘that’s what having kids does to you’ - So from my perspective, you definitely do not need to look identical to your DL photo to withdraw money. You just require varying forms of identification which we would all agree was likely available IF someone was posing as MB.

I always found the final withdrawal of 80k at a different bank to be highly unusual. Like ‘whoever’ didn’t want to return to the BB bank for the final withdrawal.

Secondly I’d like to mention MB’s wallet being stolen - am I correct that it was in 1994?

1994 was the year of the Le Corriere (sp?) ad. Is it possible MB replied to that ad, had a brief fling with FNR that didn’t go anywhere at that stage (they always say a conman will stick to the truth as close as possible - re: the 1968 Lucerne storyline of a brief fling) MB had just moved to the GC and was settling into her new role at TSS. She would be less likely to allow anyone to get her hooks into her. Is it possible that in 1994 that RB floated the idea of romance, marriage and a life abroad that MB rejected (around the time her wallet was stolen by a woman who supposedly looked like her) Could this be where it really all began? Said person already has her identification from 1994. Could the wheels have started turning then, unbeknownst to MB.

Fast forward to 1997 (by RB’s timeline he returned to Australia from Belgium in Octoberish 96) in late 96 MB received her teacher of the year award which was in the GC Bulletin. Re-enter RB after seeing MB in the newspaper. Things have reached a turning point for MB at TSS - Her relationship with GE is over - She’s vulnerable. A prime candidate to rekindle her relationship with FNR. The idea of romance, marriage and a life abroad is exactly what she wants.

Thirdly - has it ever been ascertained why the ad in Le Curriere (sp?) he was listed as MF Remakel not FNR? Was it a newspaper error - or was he going by MFR in 1994.

All speculative musings by me. Thoughts? (Sorry if all this has been mentioned - I haven’t trawled through everything on this site as yet)
A lot of this was covered in the inquest and podcast.

The 1994 advert was from a M (Monsieur) FR = AKA

The advert was placed over school holiday time and she wouldnt have seen the advert being in QLD, as per MB FB Page information

It has been mentioned on MBFB page MB met him in Feb 1997 - they must have evidence of such.

This "conman" doesnt know the meaning of Truth.

The Switz meetup he raved on about was all BS.

He met her in 1997.

Re the wallet stolen - SL has said her cc was cancelled and other cards eg Medicare replaced.


To collect money from the bank in 1997 a person would only need her original licence and her renewed 1996 passport that she got, prior to her 1997 NEW passport. The only 2 things with her photo on them.

If she walked into the bank with ONLY her new identity as FR, she would need to produce her declaration of name change.

As we know from previous victims he collects their documents prior to any movement on their part.
IMO he had MB old ID documents when he helped her pack.

He doesnt DO a thing for anyone.
Unless he gets some benefit from it.

He wasnt there packing as a helpful friend, but as the vulture he is.

JMO
 
  • #900
Can someone clarify my questions (using their spreadsheets!! :) ) please?
1) Did MB fly out of Brisbane the SAME DAY that she left LL's house and caught the bus?
Why? Maybe she stayed in Brisbane with RB a night or two.
2) Was the FNMR passport ever used?
3) Has anyone seen a photo of MB on her FNMR passport?
Why? Maybe she had her hair cut/coloured in Brisbane and related this alteration to Customs with a smile and "that's what women do".
(1) Yes, departing card says that she left on Korean Airlines KE 814 on 22 June 1997, on the same day she was dropped off by LL at Scarborough St bus station Southport, Qld.

(2) The deduction has to be the FNMR passport was the passport used to exit the country, as your passport has to match the name on the departure card. I have always remembered that it had to match the name on the ticket, so that is also something to ponder.

(3) IMO the only people to have seen the photo on the passport would be MB, the issuers, airport and immigration, and the person who verified the back on the passport photos (Dentist?)….plus one other if you know what I mean ;)
I imagine that the person verifying the photos might have remarked if they looked a lot different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
1,895
Total visitors
1,988

Forum statistics

Threads
632,349
Messages
18,625,079
Members
243,098
Latest member
sbidbh
Back
Top