I always thought there was a reason for this admission. He must have believed at the time that the police could find out she was at his house, otherwise why not deny it? They would not have been able to prove beyond suspicion that the relationship had even existed without his admission. There is something here, some fear of his that they had uncovered some proof. But what?Hey Folks been following this case for a few years now, on and off. Just one thought to add all IMO and JIMO , Strictly my opinion only
1. There is no way RC would say MB had been to his house (albeit said it was to pick up tea chests with pilot boyfriend blah blah) unless She actually had been to his house. And he knew there was ways police could find that out (maybe someone sighted them when she arrived at his house at wherever it was he lived with family in 97 , Ballina NSW ? CCTV near his house ? one of his teens leaving the house when she entered maybe ?)
Ergo Marion at some point was at his house in 97. This had to have been some point between Aug 2 to Oct 17 1997).
Not much happening unfortunatelyI really miss not seeing posts daily on here![]()
I vaguely remember this was discussed on one of the podcasts a while back. I can’t remember whether it was Laura Richards or TLV. Essentially, all of the names are linked to the same passport record, so the name change may not have been obvious to the person doing the checking. If ithe passport record was being searched in a mainframe computer database, I imagine the person doing the search would have plugged in the name MB plus birth date and just looked at the field in the database where it recorded the movement, ie a re entry date into Australia. They wouldn’t have been looking at the actual passport.Wondering about the clarity / thoughts of when it was that SL found out about M name change.
When S was at Tafe studying to get into the police force and her friend in customs found that M had returned in August 1997 - how would this be possible, with just the name MB and her birthdate ?
A new passport and different name, has a new PP number, so it cant be the PP number that found it.
If the customs friend told S that M had returned on August 1997 , and her name was so obscure, why would he then not tell her about the name change???
The friend had already possibly breached protocol by saying she arrived back so why not include the name to S? Its October, SL had already been to BB police to report M.
I keep thinking if someone said she arrived back into Aust on this date, then why not also mention her peculiar name change ???
Something like, I have found her card, it doesnt say MB but FNMR, did she change her name S ????
I just find this whole scenario very bizarre TBH and I guess looking for options on why someone wouldn't have mentioned this vital piece of information given S friend was looking for a mother who hadn't been in contact with family for 2 months or so?
The name MB and her birthdate was given and someone finds a passenger card stating the same birthdate yet completely different name and says nothing?????
S said she didn't know M new name until 2011 when she was told by Sheehan.
Anyone got any thoughts on this?
Thanks @CuriousKat99 , that makes sense to some degreeI vaguely remember this was discussed on one of the podcasts a while back. I can’t remember whether it was Laura Richards or TLV. Essentially, all of the names are linked to the same passport record, so the name change may not have been obvious to the person doing the checking. If ithe passport record was being searched in a mainframe computer database, I imagine the person doing the search would have plugged in the name MB plus birth date and just looked at the field in the database where it recorded the movement, ie a re entry date into Australia. They wouldn’t have been looking at the actual passport.
SL didn’t go into the details but she seemed satisfied that this person wouldn’t have noticed the name change.Thanks @CuriousKat99 , that makes sense to some degree
If all names are linked to a persons previous PP records then, wouldn't it also show her FR name?
Surely for security entering into Aust, Customs could see the names of passengers and not just a birthdate and previous known name ?
They had AH list of names for decades entering and leaving Aust
All depends on the type of database query that was made. If they asked for just movements then it's entirely possible that's all the data that comes back to the screen - just the dates of leaving and entering.If all names are linked to a persons previous PP records then, wouldn't it also show her FR name?
Wow, any chance of posting Part 2?just thought this is worth sharing for anyone interested, to keep us thinking.
Aka will take most of his dirty secrets to the grave and NSW Police appear to have lost all interest in the case despite the Coroner’s findings (they could have nailed this guy decades back had Marion’s case been properly investigated at the outset).How sad is this for her family. Such a complicated and mysterious situation, with no end in sight. No closure for family. Has anyone got a theory on how this can be solved?
You would still think that whatever record is brought up would still show a name? How would you know for certain you were even viewing the correct record?All depends on the type of database query that was made. If they asked for just movements then it's entirely possible that's all the data that comes back to the screen - just the dates of leaving and entering.
It’s difficult to miss the name Florabella Natalia Marion Remakel. It would have filled the screen.