In the letter dated 9 February 2021 from William James (p22) (Gleeson Affidavit 25/6/2021) – the G’s states…that “The $1 M contribution was not a gift to Melissa, nor was it a loan, nor was it a paymentto Ms Caddick for her to do what she considered appropriate with the funds….”
Interesting that the G’s wording implies that they viewed the $1m as a contribution! (definition of contribution....a gift or payment to a common fund or collection.
Whereas the Investors view is that they invested their funds into their SMSF or Investment Funds – it was never deemed to be a contribution to MC or Maliver.
Interesting that the G’s wording implies that they viewed the $1m as a contribution! (definition of contribution....a gift or payment to a common fund or collection.
Whereas the Investors view is that they invested their funds into their SMSF or Investment Funds – it was never deemed to be a contribution to MC or Maliver.