http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news...2d43a4607bf641
According to new material presented before The Court i.e. voluminous briefs of evidence including alleged email purchase receipts for a training sword, “flexicuffs”, Viagra, pornography, confirmation for “F..kDate membership’’ and an email with an enquiry about legcuffs.
The catalogue of the brief of evidence includes myriad witness statements, phone and Facebook conversations, the alleged email purchases, which included cleaning materials, forensic statements and what is described as “school alarm activity.”
IMO the issue of mental competence and legal capacity will be interesting in this case. Was Stephanie his 'target' or did he plan to attack a student? The school environment would provide many potential victims for someone with this kind of criminal intent.
VS was employed.He worked at a school full of teachers and students who had a right to safety. His employer had no complaints about his work. VS gained a licence to drive a vehicle and drove on our roads. VS was able to use computers, purchase items from the internet, use Australia Post. VS allegedly planned in advance to restrain a victim and assault them - even learning about the school alarm system. VS allegedly deprived the captured victim of her liberty; he allegedly committed an aggravated sexual assault, then murdered the injured victim. VS allegedly drove the body to Cocoparra National Park where he prepared a bonfire on which he burned the corpse. VS allegedly took photographs of his victim on his mobile phone. VS allegedly stole personal property from his murder victim and posted it to his brother in South Australia.
The depravity of this crime took a degree of planning to execute. My opinion only.