EXPOSED: The Case of Keli Lane, airs across three Tuesday nights from 8.30pm 25 September on ABC and iview.
SEX. MURDER. SECRETS. LIES.
SEX. MURDER. SECRETS. LIES.
I'm watching....
I thought the episode was very damning of Keli's mother. It was cut to contrast her attitude with those of other people who expressed empathy and regret over what they didn't do.
Sarcastic and dismissive. But she respected Keli's effort to spare her parents from the inconvenience of knowing her troubles.I agree. Uncompromising. I can’t imagine being comfortable with my teenaged/young 20-something daughter dealing with 5 unplanned pregnancies ‘as she saw fit’. Or with not knowing she was pregnant — baggy clothes’ fashion or not.
Sarcastic and dismissive. But she respected Keli's effort to spare her parents from the inconvenience of knowing her troubles.
I'm not altogether persuaded by Keli's line that she felt she had nobody she could go to. I mean the story could go, that she felt abandoned by her mother . . . and hence her particular need to be in a 'relationship' . . . and therefore abandoned her own children. She seemed to have had a few other supports though, which one would expect to mitigate the effect of an unnurturing mother.
John Borovnik was not a detective, he worked for DOCs (now FACs). The context is that Keli signed a adoption care agreement for her third baby. This meant that her baby was placed in foster care whilst Keli underwent pre-adoption counselling, paperwork was complete, and she participated in the selection of an adoptive family. Keli failed to keep up contact with the adoptions officer and the care agreement lapsed. Legally this meant baby #3 was abandoned so DOCs had to get involved. John Borovnik’s job was to try to make contact with Keli and inform her of what was happening for her child. So, he has called her, presumably he has explained Keli’s choices re the baby (ie get back in touch with adoptions or DOCs will have to take custody of the baby). Then he has attempted to establish the whereabouts of Tegan, the other child not adopted so presumably in Keli’s care. The got you might be some restrospective history. Although, Borovnik’s context is important as well. He worked with abusive, neglectful parents. He would have been made aware that Keli was making herself difficult to contact during the adoption process, and that she told a number of lies through that process, some of which were discovered by the adoptions officer during the process. Because adoption is a legal matter, involving statements filed in court, this was causing a lot of delay and complication, and then the care agreement lapsed. Borovnik as a DOCs worker has likely interpreted this as a mother not prepared to act in the best interest of her child above her own interest (which is probably a fair assessment given how things have turned out). Following this, Keli faxed her adoptions worker, and in this fax she provided information about Tegan’s whereabouts - except, Andrew Norris/Morris, or even a biological father, never rated a mention. Instead Keli said a couple from Perth had befriended her and were looking after Tegan. Much was made of Keli’s contradictory accounts (of which there were several) about Tegan’s whereabouts.I've just watched the first episode. I plan on reading back on posts. I am pretty sure I have never heard of this case.
What I thought was interesting. When the detective called her and asked if she had a baby on that day, and she said no. If someone would call me about of the blue and ask me a personal questions I doubt I would answer. And after the call, the man was like I got her. That doesn't sound right to me.
Anyways going to read up and see what other facts I am missing.
I think about Gabriel Johnson, these two cases seem similar.
John Borovnik was not a detective, he worked for DOCs (now FACs). The context is that Keli signed a adoption care agreement for her third baby. This meant that her baby was placed in foster care whilst Keli underwent pre-adoption counselling, paperwork was complete, and she participated in the selection of an adoptive family. Keli failed to keep up contact with the adoptions officer and the care agreement lapsed. Legally this meant baby #3 was abandoned so DOCs had to get involved. John Borovnik’s job was to try to make contact with Keli and inform her of what was happening for her child. So, he has called her, presumably he has explained Keli’s choices re the baby (ie get back in touch with adoptions or DOCs will have to take custody of the baby). Then he has attempted to establish the whereabouts of Tegan, the other child not adopted so presumably in Keli’s care. The got you might be some restrospective history. Although, Borovnik’s context is important as well. He worked with abusive, neglectful parents. He would have been made aware that Keli was making herself difficult to contact during the adoption process, and that she told a number of lies through that process, some of which were discovered by the adoptions officer during the process. Because adoption is a legal matter, involving statements filed in court, this was causing a lot of delay and complication, and then the care agreement lapsed. Borovnik as a DOCs worker has likely interpreted this as a mother not prepared to act in the best interest of her child above her own interest (which is probably a fair assessment given how things have turned out). Following this, Keli faxed her adoptions worker, and in this fax she provided information about Tegan’s whereabouts - except, Andrew Norris/Morris, or even a biological father, never rated a mention. Instead Keli said a couple from Perth had befriended her and were looking after Tegan. Much was made of Keli’s contradictory accounts (of which there were several) about Tegan’s whereabouts.I've just watched the first episode. I plan on reading back on posts. I am pretty sure I have never heard of this case.
What I thought was interesting. When the detective called her and asked if she had a baby on that day, and she said no. If someone would call me about of the blue and ask me a personal questions I doubt I would answer. And after the call, the man was like I got her. That doesn't sound right to me.
Anyways going to read up and see what other facts I am missing.
I think about Gabriel Johnson, these two cases seem similar.
Just watched the first episode. I wasn't sure I'd be interested because there's no real mystery here and I didn't just want to hear Lane's lies. But the look into the coaches and parents who should have known about the pregnancies is very good.
The mother seems like a very cold person. Praising her daughter for dealing with her own problems and not burdening them! It didn't really ring true to me when she told about finding out and saying "why didn't you tell us, we would have helped you". What do people think about her saying she "wasn't privy to all those details" regarding Lane taking a day pass from the maternity ward (baby AJ, if I remember correctly) to have cake at her parents' house on her birthday? Didn't she watch any of the trial or ask any questions?
Maybe I'm being overly influenced by her similarities to my friend's parents who had a "don't come crying to me about it" attitude about everything from skinned knees to not understanding homework. Lane certainly went to a lot of trouble to hide the truth from everyone, and although I guess her teammates could be bitchy and her boyfriends were unreliable, her dad seems like a pretty nice guy. But if you tell him then you've told mum too and I suspect that was just unthinkable for Lane.
John Borovnik was not a detective, he worked for DOCs (now FACs). The context is that Keli signed a adoption care agreement for her third baby. This meant that her baby was placed in foster care whilst Keli underwent pre-adoption counselling, paperwork was complete, and she participated in the selection of an adoptive family. Keli failed to keep up contact with the adoptions officer and the care agreement lapsed. Legally this meant baby #3 was abandoned so DOCs had to get involved. John Borovnik’s job was to try to make contact with Keli and inform her of what was happening for her child. So, he has called her, presumably he has explained Keli’s choices re the baby (ie get back in touch with adoptions or DOCs will have to take custody of the baby). Then he has attempted to establish the whereabouts of Tegan, the other child not adopted so presumably in Keli’s care. The got you might be some restrospective history. Although, Borovnik’s context is important as well. He worked with abusive, neglectful parents. He would have been made aware that Keli was making herself difficult to contact during the adoption process, and that she told a number of lies through that process, some of which were discovered by the adoptions officer during the process. Because adoption is a legal matter, involving statements filed in court, this was causing a lot of delay and complication, and then the care agreement lapsed. Borovnik as a DOCs worker has likely interpreted this as a mother not prepared to act in the best interest of her child above her own interest (which is probably a fair assessment given how things have turned out). Following this, Keli faxed her adoptions worker, and in this fax she provided information about Tegan’s whereabouts - except, Andrew Norris/Morris, or even a biological father, never rated a mention. Instead Keli said a couple from Perth had befriended her and were looking after Tegan. Much was made of Keli’s contradictory accounts (of which there were several) about Tegan’s whereabouts.